Advanced Combustion Technologies

๐Ÿ”ฅAdvanced Combustion Technologies Unit 5 โ€“ Turbulent Combustion Modeling Methods

Turbulent combustion modeling is a complex field that combines fluid dynamics, chemical kinetics, and heat transfer. It aims to predict the behavior of turbulent flames in various applications, from engines to industrial furnaces, by capturing the intricate interactions between turbulent flow and chemical reactions. This unit covers fundamental concepts, key modeling approaches, and practical applications of turbulent combustion. It explores RANS, LES, and DNS methods, chemistry-turbulence interactions, and challenges in accurately simulating these complex phenomena. The goal is to provide a comprehensive understanding of current modeling techniques and future research directions.

Fundamentals of Turbulent Combustion

  • Turbulent combustion involves the interaction between turbulent fluid flow and chemical reactions, leading to complex and chaotic behavior
  • Characterized by high Reynolds numbers, indicating the dominance of inertial forces over viscous forces, resulting in increased mixing and heat transfer
  • Involves a wide range of length and time scales, from the smallest Kolmogorov scales to the largest integral scales, making it challenging to model and simulate
  • Turbulent flow enhances mixing of reactants and products, leading to increased flame surface area and faster combustion rates compared to laminar flow
  • Involves the coupling between fluid dynamics, chemical kinetics, and heat transfer, requiring a multidisciplinary approach to understand and model the phenomena
  • Plays a crucial role in various practical applications, such as internal combustion engines, gas turbines, and industrial furnaces, where efficient mixing and combustion are essential
  • Presents challenges in experimental measurements and numerical simulations due to the high-speed, unsteady, and three-dimensional nature of turbulent flows

Key Concepts in Turbulence Modeling

  • Turbulence modeling aims to develop mathematical models that capture the essential features of turbulent flows without resolving all the details of the turbulent fluctuations
  • Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations are widely used in turbulence modeling, where the flow variables are decomposed into mean and fluctuating components
    • RANS equations introduce additional unknown terms, such as the Reynolds stress tensor, which require closure models to solve the equations
  • Turbulence models, such as the kโˆ’ฯตk-\epsilon model and the kโˆ’ฯ‰k-\omega model, provide closure for the RANS equations by modeling the turbulent kinetic energy (kk) and its dissipation rate (ฯต\epsilon) or specific dissipation rate (ฯ‰\omega)
  • Large Eddy Simulation (LES) is another approach to turbulence modeling, where the large-scale turbulent motions are directly resolved, while the effects of the small-scale motions are modeled using subgrid-scale (SGS) models
  • Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS) resolves all the scales of turbulent motion without any modeling assumptions, but it is computationally expensive and limited to low Reynolds number flows
  • Turbulent mixing plays a crucial role in combustion processes, as it influences the local mixture composition, temperature, and reaction rates
  • Turbulence-chemistry interaction models are required to accurately capture the effects of turbulent fluctuations on the chemical reactions and heat release in combustion simulations

Overview of Combustion Modeling Approaches

  • Combustion modeling involves the mathematical description of the complex physical and chemical processes occurring during combustion
  • Chemical kinetics is a fundamental aspect of combustion modeling, describing the rates of chemical reactions and the formation and consumption of species
    • Detailed chemical kinetic mechanisms can involve hundreds or thousands of species and reactions, making them computationally expensive
  • Reduced and skeletal mechanisms are often employed to simplify the chemical kinetics while retaining the essential features of the combustion process
  • Flamelet models assume that the turbulent flame can be represented as an ensemble of laminar flame structures (flamelets) embedded in the turbulent flow field
    • Flamelet models, such as the Steady Laminar Flamelet Model (SLFM) and the Flamelet Progress Variable (FPV) approach, provide a computationally efficient way to model turbulent combustion
  • Probability Density Function (PDF) methods describe the turbulent reacting flow in terms of a joint PDF of the flow variables and species concentrations
    • PDF methods can handle the non-linear coupling between turbulence and chemistry, but they require closure models for the chemical source terms
  • Conditional Moment Closure (CMC) is a method that solves transport equations for the conditional averages of the reactive scalars, conditioned on a conserved scalar such as mixture fraction
  • Eddy Dissipation Concept (EDC) models assume that the chemical reactions occur in fine structures of the turbulent flow, where the timescales of turbulence and chemistry are comparable

RANS-Based Turbulent Combustion Models

  • RANS-based turbulent combustion models combine the RANS equations for the turbulent flow with combustion models to describe the mean chemical reactions and heat release
  • Eddy Dissipation Model (EDM) assumes that the chemical reactions are fast compared to the turbulent mixing, and the reaction rate is controlled by the turbulent mixing time scale
    • EDM is computationally efficient but lacks the ability to capture the detailed chemistry and extinction phenomena
  • Eddy Break-Up (EBU) model is similar to EDM but uses a different expression for the reaction rate based on the turbulent kinetic energy and its dissipation rate
  • Presumed PDF models assume a functional form for the joint PDF of the reactive scalars, such as the beta PDF for the mixture fraction and the delta PDF for the progress variable
    • The mean chemical source terms are then closed by integrating the chemical source terms over the presumed PDF
  • Flamelet Generated Manifold (FGM) method pre-computes the chemical reactions and species concentrations in laminar flamelet structures and tabulates them as a function of a few controlling variables, such as mixture fraction and progress variable
    • During the CFD simulation, the mean chemical source terms are retrieved from the pre-generated FGM table, reducing the computational cost
  • Transported PDF methods solve transport equations for the joint PDF of the reactive scalars, providing a more accurate description of the turbulence-chemistry interaction
    • The chemical source terms appear in closed form in the PDF transport equations, but the molecular mixing terms require closure models

LES and DNS Methods for Combustion

  • Large Eddy Simulation (LES) resolves the large-scale turbulent motions and models the effects of the small-scale motions on the combustion process
    • LES provides a more accurate representation of the turbulent flow compared to RANS, capturing the unsteady and three-dimensional nature of turbulent combustion
  • Subgrid-scale (SGS) combustion models are required in LES to account for the effects of the unresolved small-scale turbulent fluctuations on the chemical reactions
    • SGS models, such as the Artificially Thickened Flame (ATF) model and the Partially Stirred Reactor (PaSR) model, aim to capture the subgrid-scale turbulence-chemistry interaction
  • Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS) resolves all the scales of turbulent motion and the chemical reactions without any modeling assumptions
    • DNS provides the most accurate description of turbulent combustion but is computationally expensive and limited to simple geometries and low Reynolds number flows
  • DNS can be used to generate high-fidelity data for the development and validation of turbulent combustion models for LES and RANS simulations
  • LES and DNS of turbulent combustion require high-resolution computational grids and advanced numerical methods, such as high-order finite difference or spectral methods, to capture the wide range of scales involved
  • Combustion LES and DNS simulations can provide valuable insights into the fundamental processes of turbulent combustion, such as flame-turbulence interaction, ignition, and extinction phenomena

Chemistry-Turbulence Interactions

  • Chemistry-turbulence interactions play a crucial role in turbulent combustion, as the turbulent fluctuations affect the local mixture composition, temperature, and reaction rates
  • Turbulent mixing can enhance the chemical reactions by increasing the surface area of the flame and promoting the mixing of reactants and products
    • However, turbulence can also lead to local extinction of the flame if the turbulent strain rate exceeds a critical value
  • The Damkรถhler number (DaDa) is a dimensionless parameter that characterizes the relative importance of turbulent mixing and chemical reactions
    • Da=ฯ„t/ฯ„cDa = \tau_t / \tau_c, where ฯ„t\tau_t is the turbulent time scale and ฯ„c\tau_c is the chemical time scale
    • For Daโ‰ซ1Da \gg 1, the chemical reactions are fast compared to the turbulent mixing, and the combustion is mixing-limited
    • For Daโ‰ช1Da \ll 1, the turbulent mixing is fast compared to the chemical reactions, and the combustion is chemistry-limited
  • The Karlovitz number (KaKa) is another dimensionless parameter that describes the relative importance of the chemical time scale and the Kolmogorov time scale
    • Ka=ฯ„c/ฯ„ฮทKa = \tau_c / \tau_\eta, where ฯ„ฮท\tau_\eta is the Kolmogorov time scale
    • For Kaโ‰ช1Ka \ll 1, the chemical reactions occur at scales much smaller than the Kolmogorov scales, and the flame is considered to be in the flamelet regime
    • For Kaโ‰ซ1Ka \gg 1, the chemical reactions occur at scales comparable to or larger than the Kolmogorov scales, and the flame is considered to be in the distributed reaction regime
  • Turbulence-chemistry interaction models, such as the Eddy Dissipation Concept (EDC) and the Partially Stirred Reactor (PaSR) model, aim to capture the effects of turbulent fluctuations on the chemical reactions
  • Advanced techniques, such as Conditional Moment Closure (CMC) and transported PDF methods, provide a more accurate description of the chemistry-turbulence interactions by solving transport equations for the conditional averages or joint PDF of the reactive scalars

Practical Applications and Case Studies

  • Turbulent combustion modeling is essential for the design and optimization of various practical combustion systems, such as internal combustion engines, gas turbines, and industrial furnaces
  • In internal combustion engines, turbulent combustion models are used to predict the fuel-air mixing, ignition, flame propagation, and pollutant formation processes
    • RANS-based models, such as the Eddy Break-Up (EBU) model and the Flamelet Generated Manifold (FGM) method, are commonly used in engine simulations due to their computational efficiency
  • Gas turbines rely on turbulent combustion to achieve high power density and efficiency
    • LES and DNS studies of gas turbine combustors provide insights into the complex flow and combustion processes, such as swirl-stabilized flames, lean blowout, and thermoacoustic instabilities
  • Industrial furnaces, such as those used in the steel and glass industries, involve turbulent combustion of gaseous or liquid fuels
    • RANS-based models, such as the Eddy Dissipation Model (EDM) and the Presumed PDF approach, are commonly used to simulate the combustion process in industrial furnaces
  • Combustion of alternative fuels, such as syngas, biogas, and hydrogen-enriched fuels, presents new challenges for turbulent combustion modeling due to the different chemical kinetics and transport properties compared to conventional fuels
  • Multiphase turbulent combustion, involving the presence of liquid fuel droplets or solid fuel particles, adds additional complexity to the modeling process
    • Lagrangian particle tracking methods are often coupled with turbulent combustion models to simulate spray combustion or pulverized coal combustion
  • Validation and verification of turbulent combustion models against experimental data are crucial for assessing their accuracy and predictive capabilities
    • Laser diagnostic techniques, such as Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) and Planar Laser-Induced Fluorescence (PLIF), provide valuable experimental data for model validation

Challenges and Future Directions

  • Turbulent combustion modeling faces several challenges due to the complex and multi-scale nature of the problem
  • Accurate and efficient chemical kinetic mechanisms are essential for capturing the detailed chemistry in turbulent combustion simulations
    • The development of reduced and skeletal mechanisms that retain the essential features of the combustion process while minimizing the computational cost is an ongoing research area
  • Turbulence-chemistry interaction models that can accurately capture the effects of turbulent fluctuations on the chemical reactions across a wide range of combustion regimes (flamelet to distributed reaction) are needed
  • The prediction of pollutant formation, such as nitrogen oxides (NOx) and soot, in turbulent combustion systems remains a challenge due to the complex chemical pathways involved
  • The extension of turbulent combustion models to high-pressure conditions, such as those encountered in advanced gas turbine and diesel engine combustors, requires the consideration of real-gas effects and pressure-dependent kinetics
  • The integration of turbulent combustion models with other physical processes, such as heat transfer, radiation, and multiphase flows, is necessary for the comprehensive modeling of practical combustion systems
  • The development of efficient numerical algorithms and high-performance computing techniques is crucial for enabling high-fidelity LES and DNS of turbulent combustion in complex geometries and at realistic operating conditions
  • Machine learning and data-driven approaches are emerging as promising tools for turbulent combustion modeling, leveraging the growing availability of experimental and numerical data
    • Data-driven models can be used to develop reduced-order models, optimize combustion system design, and assist in the development and calibration of physics-based models
  • The validation and uncertainty quantification of turbulent combustion models using advanced experimental techniques and Bayesian inference methods are essential for assessing their reliability and guiding further model development


ยฉ 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
APยฎ and SATยฎ are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.

ยฉ 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
APยฎ and SATยฎ are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.