11.1 Appellate Practice and Procedure Research

Appellate practice and procedure research is crucial for navigating the complex world of appeals. It involves digging into primary sources like court rules and case law, as well as secondary sources that provide valuable insights and strategies.

Effective appellate research requires a thorough review of the trial record, identifying key issues, and crafting persuasive arguments. It's essential to understand the specific requirements for each stage of the appellate process, from filing the initial notice to preparing for oral arguments.

Sources for Appellate Research

Primary Sources Governing Appellate Process

Top images from around the web for Primary Sources Governing Appellate Process

• 

  U. S. Courts: How do courts interpret contracts and laws? | United States Government View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  U S Courts: Structure and Procedure | United States Government View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Dual Court System – American Government (2e) View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  U. S. Courts: How do courts interpret contracts and laws? | United States Government View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  U S Courts: Structure and Procedure | United States Government View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Primary Sources Governing Appellate Process

• 

  U. S. Courts: How do courts interpret contracts and laws? | United States Government View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  U S Courts: Structure and Procedure | United States Government View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Dual Court System – American Government (2e) View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  U. S. Courts: How do courts interpret contracts and laws? | United States Government View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  U S Courts: Structure and Procedure | United States Government View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Federal and state rules of appellate procedure are the primary sources governing the appellate process
  • Dictate timelines, filing requirements, formatting of briefs and motions, and other procedural aspects
• Case law from the relevant appellate court provides binding precedent on appellate procedures and standards of review that must be followed
  • Published appellate court opinions offer guidance on the court's interpretation and application of the rules
  • Examples: opinions addressing timeliness of appeals, waiver of arguments, or application of abuse of discretion standard
• Local rules of appellate procedure supplement the federal or state rules and often include additional requirements specific to each appellate court
  • May address unique filing procedures, brief formatting, oral argument protocols, or other local practices
  • Example: specific requirements for color of brief covers or binding methods

Secondary Sources and Court-Specific Resources

• Appellate court websites contain valuable resources
  • Include court-specific guides, checklists, sample documents, and links to rules and forms
  • Many courts publish practice manuals detailing the nuances of appellate procedure
  • Example: US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Appellate Practice Guide
• Secondary sources provide in-depth analysis of appellate procedure, discuss strategic considerations, and offer tips for effective brief writing and oral advocacy
  • Key treatises include the Federal Appellate Practice Guide, Mayer Brown's Federal Appellate Practice, and the American Bar Association's Appellate Practice Compendium
  • Legal encyclopedias such as American Jurisprudence and Corpus Juris Secundum have sections devoted to Appeals and Errors that summarize appellate procedural standards
  • Law review articles often address specific aspects of appellate practice (preservation of error, standards of review)

Conducting Appellate Research

Reviewing the Record and Identifying Issues

• Begin by carefully reviewing the trial court record, including all pleadings, motions, orders, exhibits, and transcripts
  • Identify potential issues for appeal and ensure the record is complete
  • Example: review trial transcripts for objections raised and rulings made to assess preservation of error
• Research the applicable standard of review for each issue
  • The standard of review will guide the framing of arguments and degree of deference the appellate court will give to the lower court's decision
  • Common standards include de novo for legal issues, clear error for factual findings, and abuse of discretion for many procedural rulings

Analyzing Relevant Authority and Crafting Arguments

• Conduct an in-depth analysis of the relevant rules of appellate procedure and case law
  • Identify mandatory authority governing the issues on appeal and procedural requirements
  • Focus on cases from the same jurisdiction and court if possible
• Expand research to persuasive authority from other jurisdictions, secondary sources, and policy considerations
  • Used to craft arguments and analogize or distinguish the case at hand
  • Examples: circuit splits, decisions from other states, law review articles, legal treatises
• Thoroughly research and brief the merits of each issue
  • Focus on the most persuasive arguments and key legal authorities
  • Anticipate and address counterarguments preemptively in your briefs

Motions and Procedural Requirements

• Determine whether to file any motions, such as for a stay pending appeal, to expand the word limit, or to file an amicus brief
  • Research the specific procedural requirements and strategic considerations for each
  • Example: motions to stay may require showing a likelihood of success on the merits and irreparable harm
• Compile and cite check the final brief and any accompanying motions or filings
  • Ensure compliance with all applicable rules
  • Verify accuracy and format of citations (Bluebook or local court rules)

Research Requirements for Appellate Stages

Pre-Briefing Stage

• Prior to filing a notice of appeal, research whether the order or judgment is appealable, the applicable deadline, and the specific content and formatting requirements for the notice
  • Most jurisdictions require appeals to be filed within 30 days of final judgment
  • Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 3 specifies content of notice of appeal
• Before briefing, research the standards for filing any necessary motions such as for a stay, injunction pending appeal, or to exceed word limits
  • Consider strategic and procedural aspects of each
  • Example: seeking a stay requires showing likelihood of success on merits, irreparable harm, balance of equities, and public interest

Briefing Stage

• At the briefing stage, focus research on the key legal issues and arguments, standards of review, and procedural requirements for the brief format, content, citations, and filing
• The appellant's opening brief should:
  • Include the strongest arguments for reversal
  • Fully develop the factual and legal basis
  • Preemptively address expected counterarguments
• The appellee's response brief should:
  • Research the most persuasive grounds to affirm the lower court decision
  • Expose flaws in the appellant's arguments
  • Emphasize points of agreement with the lower court
• A reply brief should:
  • Be narrowly focused on rebutting specific points in the response brief
  • Avoid rehashing prior arguments already made in the opening brief

Oral Argument and Post-Decision Stages

• If oral argument is granted, research the specific protocols of the court, common questions posed by the panel, and prepare to address weaknesses in your briefs
  • Be familiar with all key cases and the record
  • Expect to get questions about the standard of review and most vulnerable aspects of your argument
• Following a decision, research whether a motion for reconsideration or en banc review is warranted
  • Look at the stringent standards for granting such requests (Fed. R. App. P. 35 for en banc review)
  • Very few cases get reconsidered or reheard en banc
  • Most common grounds are conflicts with Supreme Court or same circuit precedent

Evaluating Appellate Research Strategies

Thoroughness and Depth of Research

• Evaluate whether research is sufficiently thorough by ensuring all potential issues have been identified, standards of review determined, and key binding authorities located for each issue
  • Effective research should address both procedural and substantive aspects comprehensively
  • Failing to address a key issue or authority can be detrimental
• Assess whether research goes beyond cases with identical facts to identify useful analogies and public policy considerations that may persuade the court
  • The unique nature of appeals may require looking to other jurisdictions or persuasive authority
  • Examples: circuit splits showing disagreement among federal courts or inconsistent applications of a legal principle

Quality and Relevance of Authorities

• Consider whether research has located the most current and binding authority in light of any recent amendments to statutes or rules, or new case law
  • Failure to cite to controlling precedent can be fatal to an appeal
  • Regularly check for new decisions or rule changes throughout the appeal
• Determine if research effectively prioritizes quality over quantity, focusing on the most relevant and persuasive authorities rather than string cites or redundant cases
  • Briefs are subject to strict word limits
  • A few strongly analogous cases is better than dozens of marginal ones
• Evaluate if research strikes the appropriate balance between procedural and substantive issues based on the specific needs of the case and pertinent standards of review
  • Some appeals may turn on procedural errors while others focus solely on legal merits
  • The standards of review should influence the relative emphasis between legal and factual issues

Effective Use of Secondary Sources

• Assess whether research addresses the appropriate standard at each stage of the appellate process
  • Example: the deferential standards for discretionary review or en banc consideration compared to de novo review of legal issues
• Consider whether research effectively uses secondary sources to fill gaps in understanding, provide useful commentary, or identify further primary authorities
  • Avoid over-relying on non-binding sources
  • Treatises and practice guides are especially helpful for understanding court-specific procedures and practical considerations