12.1 Planning and Organizing Large-Scale Legal Research Projects

Legal research projects can be daunting, but with the right planning, they're totally manageable. It's all about breaking things down into bite-sized pieces and staying organized. From defining your problem to setting timelines, a solid plan is key to success.

When tackling a big research project, it's crucial to divide and conquer. Create specific questions, prioritize tasks, and set realistic deadlines. Don't forget to track your progress and be flexible – things don't always go as planned, and that's okay!

Planning Legal Research Projects

Defining the Research Problem and Scope

Top images from around the web for Defining the Research Problem and Scope

• 

  Free of Charge Creative Commons jurisdiction Image - Legal 1 View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Determine Purpose and Scope of Analysis | Bridgespan View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Dual Court System – American Government (2e) View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Free of Charge Creative Commons jurisdiction Image - Legal 1 View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Determine Purpose and Scope of Analysis | Bridgespan View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Defining the Research Problem and Scope

• 

  Free of Charge Creative Commons jurisdiction Image - Legal 1 View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Determine Purpose and Scope of Analysis | Bridgespan View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Dual Court System – American Government (2e) View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Free of Charge Creative Commons jurisdiction Image - Legal 1 View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Determine Purpose and Scope of Analysis | Bridgespan View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• A comprehensive legal research project plan should include a clear problem statement that defines the legal issue(s) to be researched and the desired outcome or deliverable
• The plan should outline the scope of the research, including the relevant jurisdiction(s) (federal, state, or local), time period (current or historical), and types of legal authorities to be consulted (statutes, case law, regulations, secondary sources)

Developing Search Strategies and Resource Identification

• A list of key search terms, phrases, and concepts should be developed to guide the research process and ensure thorough coverage of the topic
• The plan should identify the available resources, such as legal databases (Westlaw, LexisNexis), libraries (law school or public law libraries), and expert consultations (law professors or practicing attorneys), that will be utilized to conduct the research

Assigning Roles and Responsibilities

• Roles and responsibilities should be assigned to team members, including the allocation of specific research tasks (case law analysis, statutory research) and the designation of a project lead or coordinator (managing timelines and deliverables)
• A system for organizing and managing research findings, such as a shared database (Google Drive, Dropbox) or file structure (categorized by issue or jurisdiction), should be established to facilitate collaboration and ensure easy access to information

Establishing Timelines and Milestones

• The plan should incorporate a timeline with specific milestones and deadlines for completing various stages of the research process, such as initial background research (2 weeks), in-depth analysis (4 weeks), and synthesis of findings (2 weeks)
• Regular progress reviews (weekly team meetings) should be scheduled to ensure that the research is proceeding as planned and to address any issues or concerns promptly

Breaking Down Complex Tasks

Defining Research Goals and Sub-Topics

• Begin by clearly defining the ultimate goal or objective of the research project, as this will guide the development of specific research tasks and sub-tasks (e.g., determining the viability of a legal claim, identifying potential defenses)
• Identify the major themes, issues, or sub-topics that need to be addressed to comprehensively research the legal problem at hand (e.g., elements of the claim, applicable statutes of limitations, relevant case law)

Creating Specific Research Questions and Prioritizing Tasks

• For each major theme or issue, create a list of specific research questions that need to be answered, focusing on key legal concepts (mens rea, proximate cause), relevant jurisdiction(s) (federal or state law), and applicable legal authorities (statutes, case law)
• Prioritize the research tasks based on their importance to the overall project and the logical sequence in which they should be completed, considering any dependencies between tasks (e.g., identifying relevant statutes before searching for case law interpreting those statutes)

Breaking Tasks into Actionable Steps

• Break down each research task into smaller, actionable steps, such as conducting initial background research (consulting legal encyclopedias or treatises), identifying relevant legal authorities (searching databases or compilations), analyzing and synthesizing findings (briefing cases or summarizing statutes), and drafting summaries or memoranda (organizing findings by issue or jurisdiction)
• Assign realistic deadlines for completing each step, taking into account the complexity of the task, the availability of resources, and any external factors that may impact the research process (court deadlines, client meetings)

Monitoring Progress and Adjusting Plans

• Regularly review progress on each task and adjust the research plan as needed to ensure that the project remains on track and that any obstacles or challenges are addressed in a timely manner
• Utilize project management tools (Gantt charts, Trello boards) to visualize progress and identify potential bottlenecks or delays

Timelines and Milestones for Research

Establishing Project Deadlines and Phases

• Begin by establishing the final deadline for completing the entire legal research project, working backwards from any externally imposed deadlines (court filing dates, client meetings)
• Identify the major phases of the research process, such as initial planning (1 week), background research (2 weeks), in-depth analysis (4 weeks), synthesis of findings (2 weeks), and preparation of final deliverables (1 week)

Estimating Time Requirements and Setting Milestones

• For each phase, estimate the amount of time required to complete the associated tasks, considering factors such as the complexity of the legal issues, the volume of relevant authorities, and the experience level of the researchers
• Set specific milestones for completing each phase of the research process, allowing for some flexibility to accommodate unexpected challenges or delays (e.g., completing background research within 2 weeks, identifying key cases within 4 weeks)

Establishing Interim Deadlines and Progress Reviews

• Within each phase, establish interim deadlines for completing specific tasks or sub-tasks, such as conducting database searches (1 week), reviewing key cases (2 weeks), or drafting memoranda summarizing research findings (1 week)
• Build in time for regular progress reviews and quality control checks to ensure that the research is proceeding as planned and that any issues or concerns are identified and addressed promptly (weekly team meetings, peer review of draft memoranda)

Communicating Timelines and Ensuring Commitment

• Communicate the timeline and milestones to all team members involved in the research project, ensuring that everyone understands their roles and responsibilities and is committed to meeting the established deadlines
• Utilize collaboration tools (shared calendars, project management software) to ensure that all team members have access to the most up-to-date timeline and can track progress towards milestones

Resource Allocation for Research Completion

Identifying Required Skills and Expertise

• Identify the specific skills, knowledge, and expertise required to successfully complete the legal research project, considering factors such as the complexity of the legal issues, the relevant jurisdiction(s), and the types of authorities to be consulted (e.g., familiarity with federal securities law, experience with administrative law research)
• Assess the available human resources, including attorneys, paralegals, and legal research specialists, and allocate tasks based on each individual's strengths, experience, and workload capacity

Ensuring Access to Research Tools and Resources

• Ensure that team members have access to the necessary legal research tools and resources, such as databases (Westlaw, LexisNexis), treatises (Wright & Miller's Federal Practice and Procedure), and practice guides (Collier on Bankruptcy), and provide training or support as needed to optimize their use of these resources
• Consider the need for additional resources, such as access to specialized databases (Bloomberg Law for corporate and financial research) or consultation with subject matter experts (law professors or industry professionals), and allocate budget or secure permissions as necessary

Facilitating Communication and Collaboration

• Establish clear lines of communication and collaboration among team members, utilizing project management tools or platforms (Slack, Microsoft Teams) to facilitate the sharing of information, ideas, and progress updates
• Schedule regular team meetings (weekly status updates, bi-weekly research roundtables) to ensure that everyone is informed about the project's progress and has the opportunity to provide input or raise concerns

Monitoring and Adjusting Resource Allocation

• Monitor the allocation of resources throughout the research process, regularly assessing whether team members have the necessary support and capacity to complete their assigned tasks on schedule
• Be prepared to adjust resource allocation as needed to address any challenges or obstacles that arise, such as reallocating tasks among team members (shifting focus from case law to statutory research) or bringing in additional support from outside the core research team (engaging a subject matter expert for a particularly complex issue)

Prioritizing Critical Research Tasks

• Prioritize the allocation of resources to the most critical or time-sensitive aspects of the research project, ensuring that key milestones and deadlines are met even if less critical tasks need to be deferred or streamlined
• Regularly communicate priorities to team members and stakeholders (clients, supervising attorneys) to ensure that everyone is aligned on the most important objectives and can adjust their efforts accordingly