3.3 Tracking Legislative History and Intent

Legislative history is a powerful tool for understanding the purpose and intent behind laws. It includes documents created during a bill's journey to becoming law, like committee reports, hearing transcripts, and floor debates. These sources can provide crucial insights into why a law was passed and what it aims to achieve.

Analyzing legislative history requires careful examination of various documents and their context. Committee reports often offer the most authoritative explanations, while hearing transcripts and floor debates can reveal differing viewpoints and concerns. Understanding how to interpret and use legislative history effectively is essential for legal research and argumentation.

Statute Legislative History

Investigating Legislative History

Top images from around the web for Investigating Legislative History

• 

  Floor Debates - Federal Legislative History - Research Guides at Florida State University ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Documents - Federal Legislative History - Research Guides at Florida State University College of ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Committee Reports - Federal Legislative History - Research Guides at Florida State University ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Floor Debates - Federal Legislative History - Research Guides at Florida State University ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Documents - Federal Legislative History - Research Guides at Florida State University College of ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Investigating Legislative History

• 

  Floor Debates - Federal Legislative History - Research Guides at Florida State University ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Documents - Federal Legislative History - Research Guides at Florida State University College of ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Committee Reports - Federal Legislative History - Research Guides at Florida State University ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Floor Debates - Federal Legislative History - Research Guides at Florida State University ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Documents - Federal Legislative History - Research Guides at Florida State University College of ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Legislative history refers to the documents created during the process of a bill becoming law, which can provide insight into the purpose, intent, and evolution of a statute
• The legislative process typically involves:
  • Introduction of a bill
  • Committee referral and hearings
  • Committee reports
  • Floor debates
  • Passage by each chamber
  • Conference committee to reconcile differences between House and Senate versions
  • Executive signature or veto
• Key sources of legislative history include:
  • Text of the bill and amendments at various stages
  • Committee reports
  • Hearing transcripts
  • Floor debate transcripts
  • Conference committee reports
• Statements of purpose or intent may be included in the preamble or introductory sections of a bill or in committee reports
• Changes to the bill's language during the legislative process can indicate shifts in purpose or intent and compromises reached (removal of controversial provisions, addition of exceptions or limitations)

Analyzing Legislative Documents

Committee Reports

• Committee reports often provide the most authoritative and detailed explanations of a bill's purpose, key provisions, and intended effects
  • House and Senate committee reports are numbered and published in the Congressional Reports volumes
  • Conference committee reports reconcile differences between House and Senate versions of a bill
• Factors affecting the persuasive value of committee reports include:
  • Relevance to the specific statutory provision or issue in question
  • Consistency with other legislative history sources and statutory text
  • Level of detail and clarity in explaining bill provisions and rationale

Committee Hearings and Floor Debates

• Transcripts of committee hearings include witness testimony and questioning by committee members, which can shed light on:
  • Problems the bill seeks to address (examples of harm or need for regulation)
  • Differing stakeholder views and concerns raised (industry opposition, consumer advocacy)
  • Hearing transcripts are published in separate volumes for House and Senate committees
• Floor debate transcripts capture statements by bill sponsors, floor managers, and other members, which may:
  • Explain bill provisions and respond to questions
  • Discuss legislative intent and purpose
  • Offer examples of intended application or effects
  • Floor debates are published in the Congressional Record daily edition and bound volumes

Compiled Legislative History Sources

• The U.S. Code Congressional and Administrative News (USCCAN) includes selected committee reports and other legislative history documents for major laws
• Compiled legislative histories may be available from government or commercial publishers for significant statutes (Civil Rights Act, Affordable Care Act)
• Compiled sources can provide a curated and condensed set of key legislative history documents, but should be supplemented with additional research for a comprehensive understanding

Legislative History in Legal Arguments

Interpreting Ambiguous Statutory Language

• Legislative history can help courts interpret ambiguous statutory language by providing evidence of:
  • Legislative intent and purpose
  • Meaning of key terms and phrases
  • Examples of intended application or scope
• Factors affecting the persuasive value of legislative history in interpretation include:
  • Relevance to the specific ambiguity or interpretive question at issue
  • Reliability and authority of the legislative history source
  • Consistency with statutory text and other interpretive tools (canons, precedent)

Limitations and Considerations

• Availability of legislative history may be limited for older statutes or less significant legislation
• Legislative history may be incomplete or inconclusive, failing to address the specific issue in question
• Individual legislators' statements may reflect personal views rather than the understanding of the entire Congress
• Legislative history may be strategically manipulated by "planting" favorable statements to influence later judicial interpretation
• Textualist judges place greater emphasis on statutory language itself than extrinsic sources like legislative history

Legislative Intent Interpretations

Reconciling Conflicting Legislative History

• Legislative history sources may contain conflicting statements about a bill's intent or purpose
  • Conflicts may arise between House and Senate committee reports
  • Individual legislators may express differing understandings or objectives
  • Earlier and later versions of the bill may reflect evolving intent
• Techniques for reconciling conflicting legislative history include:
  • Prioritizing sources seen as most authoritative (conference reports, sponsor statements)
  • Examining timeline of legislative process to identify most contemporaneous sources
  • Evaluating context to determine if apparent conflicts reflect differing emphasis or responses to concerns
• Where conflicts cannot be convincingly reconciled, courts may find legislative history inconclusive and rely on other interpretive tools

Credibility in Presenting Legislative History

• Attorneys using legislative history in legal arguments should:
  • Acknowledge and address apparent conflicts in legislative history
  • Prioritize most relevant and authoritative sources
  • Avoid selective or misleading presentation of legislative history excerpts
  • Explain how legislative history supports proposed statutory interpretation
  • Anticipate and respond to counterarguments based on conflicting or inconclusive history
• Maintaining credibility in presenting legislative history is essential to persuasive legal argument