2.2 Evaluating and verifying sources

Evaluating sources is crucial for reliable reporting. You'll learn to assess credibility, fact-check info, and spot biases. These skills help you find trustworthy sources and avoid spreading misinformation.

Proper attribution is key in media writing. You'll discover how to cite sources correctly, both in-text and at the end. This builds credibility and lets readers verify info themselves.

Source Credibility and Reliability

Assessing Credibility and Reliability

Top images from around the web for Assessing Credibility and Reliability

• 

  Credibility - Free of Charge Creative Commons Tablet image View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Finding Sources | Basic Reading and Writing View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Introduction to Research Process | English Composition I View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Credibility - Free of Charge Creative Commons Tablet image View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Finding Sources | Basic Reading and Writing View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Assessing Credibility and Reliability

• 

  Credibility - Free of Charge Creative Commons Tablet image View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Finding Sources | Basic Reading and Writing View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Introduction to Research Process | English Composition I View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Credibility - Free of Charge Creative Commons Tablet image View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Finding Sources | Basic Reading and Writing View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Assess the credibility and reliability of sources based on established criteria
• Credibility refers to the trustworthiness and expertise of a source, while reliability refers to the consistency and stability of the information provided by the source over time
• Established criteria for evaluating credibility include the author's qualifications, the publication's reputation, the presence of citations and references, the timeliness of the information, and the overall quality of the writing and presentation (The New York Times, peer-reviewed journals)
• Established criteria for evaluating reliability include the consistency of the information with other reputable sources, the presence of a clear methodology or approach, the absence of obvious errors or contradictions, and the stability of the information over time (government reports, academic studies)

Frameworks and Techniques for Evaluation

• The CRAAP test (Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, Purpose) is a widely used framework for systematically evaluating the credibility and reliability of sources in academic and professional contexts
• Lateral reading, which involves cross-referencing information from multiple sources, can help to establish the credibility and reliability of a source by providing additional context and perspective
• Consulting with subject matter experts or trusted authorities in a field can provide valuable insights into the credibility and reliability of sources (professors, industry professionals)
• Examining the publication's editorial process, such as peer review or fact-checking procedures, can help to assess the credibility and reliability of the information presented (scientific journals, reputable news organizations)

Fact-Checking Techniques for Accuracy

Verifying Information Through Research

• Fact-checking involves systematically verifying the accuracy of information presented in a source through independent research and investigation
• Common fact-checking techniques include cross-referencing information with other reputable sources, consulting with subject matter experts, and tracing information back to its original source
• Reverse image searching can be used to verify the authenticity and original context of images used in a source (Google Images, TinEye)
• Data journalism techniques, such as analyzing and visualizing datasets, can be used to verify the accuracy of statistical claims or numerical information presented in a source (Excel, Tableau)

Using Fact-Checking Tools and Resources

• Online tools such as Snopes, FactCheck.org, and PolitiFact can be used to quickly verify the accuracy of specific claims or statements
• Fact-checking websites often provide detailed analyses and explanations of the claims they investigate, along with references to original sources and evidence (Washington Post Fact Checker, AP Fact Check)
• Many reputable news organizations and media outlets have dedicated fact-checking teams or resources that can be consulted for verifying information (BBC Reality Check, NPR Fact Check)
• Academic and professional databases, such as JSTOR or LexisNexis, can be used to access reliable and authoritative sources for fact-checking purposes

Recognizing and Addressing Biases

Types and Manifestations of Bias

• Bias refers to a systematic tendency to favor one perspective or viewpoint over others, often based on personal, ideological, or institutional factors
• Common types of bias in media sources include selection bias (cherry-picking information to support a particular viewpoint), confirmation bias (seeking out information that confirms pre-existing beliefs), and framing bias (presenting information in a way that influences how it is perceived)
• Bias can manifest in the choice of topics covered, the sources cited, the language and tone used, and the overall framing and presentation of the information (political affiliations, advertising interests)
• Bias can be conscious or unconscious, and can stem from a variety of factors such as cultural background, education, personal experiences, or institutional pressures (media ownership, target audience)

Techniques for Recognizing and Accounting for Bias

• Techniques for recognizing bias in sources include analyzing the author's background and affiliations, examining the publication's editorial stance and funding sources, and comparing the information presented with other sources from different perspectives
• Accounting for bias in the writing process involves acknowledging and transparently communicating any potential biases or limitations in the sources used, presenting multiple perspectives on a topic, and striving for balance and objectivity in the overall presentation of the information
• Seeking out sources from diverse perspectives and backgrounds can help to counteract potential biases and provide a more comprehensive understanding of a topic (international media, marginalized voices)
• Critically evaluating one's own biases and assumptions as a writer is essential for producing balanced and objective media content (self-reflection, peer feedback)

Attribution and Citation in Media Writing

Importance and Guidelines

• Attribution involves clearly and accurately identifying the sources of information used in a piece of writing, while citation involves providing detailed bibliographic information about those sources
• Proper attribution and citation are essential for establishing the credibility and transparency of media writing, as well as for avoiding plagiarism and respecting intellectual property rights
• Different media formats and publications may have specific guidelines or standards for attribution and citation, such as the Associated Press (AP) style for news writing or the Modern Language Association (MLA) style for academic writing
• Properly attributing and citing sources not only enhances the credibility and professionalism of media writing but also helps readers to locate and verify the original sources of information for themselves

In-Text and End-of-Text Citations

• In-text attribution typically involves mentioning the source of information within the body of the text, either through direct quotation or paraphrasing, while in-text citation usually involves providing a brief reference to the source (such as the author's name and publication year) within the text
• Direct quotations should be enclosed in quotation marks and attributed to the original source, while paraphrased information should be clearly distinguished from the writer's own ideas and analysis (signal phrases, parenthetical citations)
• End-of-text citation typically involves providing a detailed list of all sources used in the writing, formatted according to the relevant style guide or publication standards, and may include elements such as the author's name, publication title, date, and URL or DOI (digital object identifier)
• Bibliographic information should be accurate, complete, and consistently formatted to enable readers to easily locate and access the original sources (reference lists, works cited pages)