Membrane processes in wastewater treatment use different pore sizes to remove contaminants. From largest to smallest, microfiltration, ultrafiltration, nanofiltration, and reverse osmosis target specific pollutants with increasing precision and pressure.
Each process has unique advantages and limitations. Microfiltration removes larger particles, while reverse osmosis can filter out tiny dissolved contaminants. Choosing the right membrane depends on the wastewater composition and treatment goals.
Membrane Processes in Wastewater Treatment
Types of membrane processes
Top images from around the web for Types of membrane processes
Frontiers | Water Treatment Effect, Microbial Community Structure, and Metabolic Characteristics ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Wastewater Treatment and Water Purification | Boundless Microbiology View original
Is this image relevant?
Recent developments of carbon based nanomaterials and membranes for oily wastewater treatment ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Frontiers | Water Treatment Effect, Microbial Community Structure, and Metabolic Characteristics ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Wastewater Treatment and Water Purification | Boundless Microbiology View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Types of membrane processes
Frontiers | Water Treatment Effect, Microbial Community Structure, and Metabolic Characteristics ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Wastewater Treatment and Water Purification | Boundless Microbiology View original
Is this image relevant?
Recent developments of carbon based nanomaterials and membranes for oily wastewater treatment ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Frontiers | Water Treatment Effect, Microbial Community Structure, and Metabolic Characteristics ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Wastewater Treatment and Water Purification | Boundless Microbiology View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Largest among the four processes ranging from 0.1 to 10 microns
Removes suspended solids, bacteria (E. coli), and protozoa (Giardia) using low operating pressure of 0.1 to 2 bar
Advantages include low , high permeate , and effective pretreatment for other processes
Limitations include inability to remove dissolved contaminants and susceptibility to
Smaller pore size than MF ranging from 0.01 to 0.1 microns
Removes viruses (norovirus), large organic molecules (proteins), and colloids in addition to MF targets using operating pressure of 1 to 10 bar
Advantages include removal of viruses and large organic molecules with moderate energy consumption
Limitations include inability to remove dissolved ions and requirement of pretreatment to prevent fouling
Pore size between UF and RO ranging from 0.001 to 0.01 microns
Removes divalent ions (calcium, magnesium), small organic molecules (pesticides), and hardness using operating pressure of 5 to 20 bar
Advantages include removal of divalent ions and small organic molecules with lower energy consumption than RO
Limitations include inability to remove all monovalent ions and potential requirement of post-treatment
Smallest pore size among the four processes at less than 0.001 microns
Removes monovalent ions (sodium, chloride), dissolved contaminants, and salts using high operating pressure of 10 to 100 bar
Advantages include removal of most dissolved contaminants and production of high-quality permeate
Limitations include high energy consumption, extensive pretreatment requirements, and generation of concentrated brine
Characteristics of membrane processes
Pore size
MF: 0.1 to 10 microns
UF: 0.01 to 0.1 microns
NF: 0.001 to 0.01 microns
RO: less than 0.001 microns
Operating pressure
MF: 0.1 to 2 bar
UF: 1 to 10 bar
NF: 5 to 20 bar
RO: 10 to 100 bar
Target contaminants
MF: suspended solids, bacteria, protozoa
UF: viruses, large organic molecules, colloids
NF: divalent ions, small organic molecules, hardness