8.3 Advanced technologies for micropollutant removal

Advanced wastewater treatment tackles tricky micropollutants that slip through regular systems. This section dives into cutting-edge methods like ozonation, UV/H2O2, and activated carbon. These processes zap, trap, or break down stubborn contaminants.

Membrane tech and combined treatments offer even more firepower against micropollutants. We'll explore how these advanced methods work together, their pros and cons, and why they're crucial for cleaner water. It's all about pushing the limits of what we can remove from wastewater.

Advanced Oxidation Processes

Compare the performance of advanced oxidation processes, such as ozonation and UV/H2O2, in removing micropollutants from wastewater

Top images from around the web for Compare the performance of advanced oxidation processes, such as ozonation and UV/H2O2, in removing micropollutants from wastewater

• 

  Frontiers | Comparison of UV/H2O2, UV/PMS, and UV/PDS in Destruction of Different Reactivity ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  COMBI, continuous ozonation merged with biofiltration to study oxidative and microbial ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Pilot-scale removal of organic micropollutants and natural organic matter from drinking water ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Comparison of UV/H2O2, UV/PMS, and UV/PDS in Destruction of Different Reactivity ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  COMBI, continuous ozonation merged with biofiltration to study oxidative and microbial ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Compare the performance of advanced oxidation processes, such as ozonation and UV/H2O2, in removing micropollutants from wastewater

• 

  Frontiers | Comparison of UV/H2O2, UV/PMS, and UV/PDS in Destruction of Different Reactivity ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  COMBI, continuous ozonation merged with biofiltration to study oxidative and microbial ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Pilot-scale removal of organic micropollutants and natural organic matter from drinking water ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Comparison of UV/H2O2, UV/PMS, and UV/PDS in Destruction of Different Reactivity ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  COMBI, continuous ozonation merged with biofiltration to study oxidative and microbial ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Ozonation utilizes ozone (O3), a strong oxidant, to react with and degrade a wide range of organic micropollutants
  • Ozonation efficiency is influenced by factors such as ozone dose, contact time, and water matrix composition
  • Can potentially produce unwanted byproducts, such as bromate, when treating waters containing bromide
• UV/H2O2 process combines ultraviolet (UV) light and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) to generate highly reactive, non-selective hydroxyl radicals (OH•) that oxidize most organic micropollutants
  • UV/H2O2 efficiency depends on UV dose, H2O2 concentration, and water quality parameters
  • Less influenced by water matrix compared to ozonation
• Comparing ozonation and UV/H2O2:
  1. Both processes effectively remove a wide range of micropollutants
  2. UV/H2O2 may be preferred for waters with high bromide content to minimize bromate formation
  3. Ozonation may be more energy-efficient for waters with high UV absorbance
  4. Combining ozonation and UV/H2O2 can enhance micropollutant removal and reduce byproduct formation

Adsorption and Membrane Technologies

Explain the principles and mechanisms of adsorption processes, such as activated carbon, for micropollutant removal

• Adsorption involves the accumulation of substances (adsorbates) on the surface of a solid material (adsorbent)
• Activated carbon, a highly porous material with a large surface area, removes micropollutants through physical adsorption (van der Waals forces) and chemical adsorption (surface functional groups)
  • Adsorption effectiveness depends on adsorbent properties (surface area, pore size distribution, surface chemistry) and adsorbate properties (molecular size, polarity, solubility)
  • Activated carbon can be applied as granular activated carbon (GAC) in fixed-bed reactors or as powdered activated carbon (PAC) in suspension
• Adsorption process involves:
  1. Transport of micropollutants from the bulk solution to the adsorbent surface
  2. Adsorption on the surface and within the pores of the adsorbent
  3. Equilibrium is reached when adsorption and desorption rates are equal
  4. Adsorption capacity can be described by isotherms (Langmuir and Freundlich models)

Evaluate the potential of membrane technologies, including nanofiltration and reverse osmosis, for selective removal of micropollutants

• Membrane technologies utilize semi-permeable membranes to separate contaminants from water
• Nanofiltration (NF) membranes have pore sizes ranging from 0.5-2 nm and remove micropollutants through size exclusion, charge repulsion, and adsorption
  • NF is effective in removing charged and moderately sized micropollutants
  • NF has lower energy consumption compared to reverse osmosis
• Reverse osmosis (RO) membranes are dense, non-porous membranes with pore sizes < 0.5 nm that remove micropollutants through a solution-diffusion mechanism
  • RO is highly effective in removing a wide range of micropollutants, including small and uncharged compounds
  • RO has higher energy consumption compared to nanofiltration
• Factors affecting membrane performance include membrane properties (pore size, surface charge, hydrophobicity), micropollutant properties (molecular size, charge, hydrophobicity), and operating conditions (pressure, feed water quality, recovery rate)
  • Membrane fouling and scaling can reduce removal efficiency and increase maintenance costs

Combined Advanced Treatment Technologies

Discuss the advantages and limitations of combining different advanced treatment technologies for enhanced micropollutant removal

• Advantages of combining technologies:
  • Targets a wider range of micropollutants with different properties
  • Synergistic effects enhance overall removal efficiency
  • Minimizes byproduct formation and improves treated water quality
  • Flexibility in process design and operation to adapt to varying water quality and treatment objectives
• Limitations of combining technologies:
  • Increased complexity in process design, operation, and maintenance
  • Higher capital and operating costs compared to single-technology systems
  • Potential for incompatible process conditions or interactions between technologies
  • Generation of concentrated waste streams requiring further treatment or disposal
• Examples of combined technologies:
  1. Ozonation followed by biological activated carbon (BAC) filtration
     • Ozonation partially oxidizes micropollutants, improving biodegradability
     • BAC removes remaining micropollutants and biodegradable organic matter
  2. Membrane filtration followed by advanced oxidation processes
     • Membrane filtration removes suspended solids and larger micropollutants
     • Advanced oxidation processes degrade remaining dissolved micropollutants
  3. Adsorption followed by advanced oxidation processes
     • Adsorption concentrates micropollutants on the adsorbent surface
     • Advanced oxidation processes regenerate the adsorbent and destroy concentrated micropollutants