Blowing up is a key technique for resolving singularities in algebraic geometry. It involves replacing a singular point with a new subvariety, separating tangent directions and creating a smoother space. This process is crucial for understanding and simplifying complex geometric objects.
is a fundamental problem in algebraic geometry. For curves and surfaces, it can be achieved through a series of blow-ups. This process transforms singular varieties into smooth ones, making them easier to study and analyze.
Blowing Up Varieties
Concept and Properties of Blowing Up
Top images from around the web for Concept and Properties of Blowing Up
Divisor (algebraic geometry) - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 2
Blowing up a variety X at a point or subvariety Y is a geometric transformation that creates a new variety X′ with a projection map back to X
The preimage of the blown-up point or subvariety Y under the projection map is called the E, which is a subvariety of X′
The exceptional divisor E has codimension one in X′
E is isomorphic to the projectivized normal bundle of Y in X
The separates the tangent directions at the point or subvariety Y, creating a new variety X′ that is less singular than the original variety X
Intuitively, the blow-up "pulls apart" the tangent directions at Y, replacing Y with a divisor E that encodes these directions
The blow-up resolves certain types of singularities, such as ordinary double points on curves (nodes)
Algebraic and Geometric Interpretations
The blow-up process can be understood algebraically by considering the projective closure of the graph of a rational map from X to a
Given a rational map f:X⇢Pn, the blow-up of X along the base locus of f is the closure of the graph of f in X×Pn
The blow-up of a variety at a point can be constructed as the projective spectrum of a certain graded algebra, called the Rees algebra
For an ideal I in a ring R, the Rees algebra is defined as ⨁n≥0In, where In is the n-th power of the ideal I
The projective spectrum of the Rees algebra ⨁n≥0In is isomorphic to the blow-up of Spec(R) along the subscheme defined by I
Constructing Blow-Ups
Affine and Projective Cases
To construct the blow-up of an affine variety X at a point p, consider the ideal I(p) of functions vanishing at p and form the graded algebra ⨁n≥0I(p)n. The projective spectrum of this algebra is the blow-up of X at p
Example: For the affine plane A2 and the origin p=(0,0), the ideal I(p) is generated by x and y. The blow-up of A2 at p is the projective spectrum of ⨁n≥0(x,y)n
For a subvariety Y of X, the blow-up of X along Y is constructed similarly using the ideal of Y
The blow-up of a projective variety X at a point p can be constructed by taking the closure of the graph of the rational map from X to the projective space of lines through p
Example: The blow-up of P2 at a point p is isomorphic to the Hirzebruch surface F1, which is a P1-bundle over P1
Explicit Equations and Exceptional Divisors
Explicitly, the blow-up of the affine plane A2 at the origin (0,0) is the subvariety of A2×P1 defined by the equation xv=yu, where (x,y) are coordinates on A2 and (u:v) are homogeneous coordinates on P1
The projection map from the blow-up to A2 is given by (x,y,(u:v))↦(x,y)
The exceptional divisor E in the blow-up of A2 at the origin is the preimage of (0,0) under the projection map, which is isomorphic to P1
In the above equations, E is defined by the equations x=y=0, which gives the projective line with coordinates (u:v)
Similar explicit constructions can be given for blow-ups of other varieties at points or subvarieties using local equations and coordinates
Resolving Singularities
Iterative Blow-Up Process
Resolving the singularities of a variety X means finding a smooth variety X′ and a proper birational morphism f:X′→X that is an isomorphism over the smooth locus of X
The variety X′ is called a resolution of singularities of X
The blow-up process can be used iteratively to resolve singularities by blowing up the singular points or subvarieties of X until a smooth variety is obtained
At each step, the blow-up separates the tangent directions at the singular point or subvariety, creating a less singular variety
The process terminates when all singular points have been resolved and the resulting variety is smooth
Curves and Surfaces
For curves, blowing up a singular point replaces it with a copy of P1, effectively separating the branches of the curve at that point. Repeated blow-ups will eventually resolve all singularities
Example: Consider the curve y2=x3 (a nodal cubic). Blowing up the origin once resolves the singularity, resulting in a smooth curve isomorphic to P1
For surfaces, the resolution of singularities may require a sequence of blow-ups. The intersection graph of the exceptional divisors created in the process is a useful tool for understanding the resolution
Example: The resolution of the singularity of the surface z2=xy (a cone) requires a sequence of two blow-ups. The first blow-up creates an exceptional divisor isomorphic to P1, and the second blow-up resolves the remaining singularity
The minimal resolution of a surface singularity is the resolution that introduces the fewest exceptional divisors. It can be obtained by blowing up only the singular points and not any smooth points
The minimal resolution is unique up to isomorphism and has important geometric and algebraic properties
Resolution of Singularities for Curves and Surfaces
Curves: Normalization and Blow-Ups
For curves, the existence of a resolution of singularities follows from the normalization theorem, which states that every reduced curve has a unique normalization (a smooth curve birational to the original curve)
The normalization of a curve is a resolution of singularities that minimizes the genus of the resulting smooth curve
The normalization of a curve can be constructed explicitly by blowing up the singular points repeatedly until a smooth curve is obtained
Each blow-up reduces the delta-invariant (a measure of singularity) of the singular point, and the process terminates when all points have delta-invariant zero (i.e., are smooth)
Example: The normalization of the cuspidal cubic y2=x3 is isomorphic to A1, obtained by a sequence of three blow-ups at the origin
Surfaces: Existence and Induction on Multiplicity
For surfaces, the existence of a resolution of singularities was proved by Walker (1935) and Zariski (1939) using the blow-up process
The proof involves showing that the singularities of a surface can be improved (i.e., made simpler) by a sequence of blow-ups, and that this process must terminate after a finite number of steps
The complexity of a singularity is measured by its multiplicity, which is the degree of the lowest degree term in the local equation of the surface at the singular point
A key step in the proof is the "induction on the multiplicity" argument, which shows that the multiplicity of a singular point decreases after a blow-up, and hence the process must eventually stop
More precisely, if the multiplicity of a singular point is m, then after a blow-up, the multiplicity of any singular point in the preimage is strictly less than m
The resolution of singularities for surfaces can also be proved using the concept of the "infinitely near points" and the "tree of infinitely near points" associated with a singular point
Infinitely near points are points on the exceptional divisors created by successive blow-ups, and the tree encodes the configuration of these points
The resolution process can be understood as a sequence of blow-ups that "untangles" the tree of infinitely near points, eventually resulting in a tree with only smooth points