14.1 Historical Assessments of Presidential Performance

Presidential rankings assess and compare the performance of U.S. presidents using various criteria. Historians and experts evaluate leaders based on factors like crisis management, economic stewardship, and moral authority to determine their place in history.

Assessing presidential performance involves considering contextual factors, leadership qualities, and long-term impact. A president's ability to handle adversity, articulate a vision, and leave a lasting positive influence on the nation shapes their legacy and historical standing.

Historical Presidential Rankings

Surveys and Rankings

Top images from around the web for Surveys and Rankings

• 

  2009 Five Presidents, President George W. Bush, President Elect Barack Obama, Former Presidents ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Episode #24: Ranking presidents, facing frontrunners - Ken Rudin's Political Junkie View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  File:Living US Presidents 2009.jpg - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  2009 Five Presidents, President George W. Bush, President Elect Barack Obama, Former Presidents ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Episode #24: Ranking presidents, facing frontrunners - Ken Rudin's Political Junkie View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Surveys and Rankings

• 

  2009 Five Presidents, President George W. Bush, President Elect Barack Obama, Former Presidents ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Episode #24: Ranking presidents, facing frontrunners - Ken Rudin's Political Junkie View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  File:Living US Presidents 2009.jpg - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  2009 Five Presidents, President George W. Bush, President Elect Barack Obama, Former Presidents ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Episode #24: Ranking presidents, facing frontrunners - Ken Rudin's Political Junkie View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Presidential rankings assess and compare the performance, effectiveness, and legacy of U.S. presidents using various criteria and methodologies
• Historiography, the study of historical writing and interpretations, plays a crucial role in shaping perceptions and evaluations of presidential performance over time
• C-SPAN Presidential Historians Survey, conducted periodically since 2000, polls historians and presidential experts to rank presidents based on ten leadership characteristics (public persuasion, crisis leadership, economic management, moral authority, international relations, administrative skills, relations with Congress, vision/setting an agenda, pursued equal justice for all, performance within the context of their times)
• Siena College Research Institute Survey, another prominent presidential ranking, evaluates presidents based on their background, imagination, integrity, intelligence, luck, willingness to take risks, ability to compromise, executive ability, leadership ability, overall ability, and communication ability

Categorizing Presidents

• Great Presidents are those consistently ranked at the top of historical surveys due to their significant achievements, leadership during pivotal moments, and lasting positive impact on the nation (Abraham Lincoln, George Washington, Franklin D. Roosevelt)
• Failed Presidencies refer to administrations marred by scandal, mismanagement, poor decision-making, or inability to effectively address major challenges facing the country (James Buchanan, Andrew Johnson, Warren G. Harding)
• Presidents falling between these extremes are often categorized as near-great, above-average, average, or below-average based on their relative strengths and weaknesses in various aspects of presidential leadership and their overall impact on American history

Assessing Presidential Performance

Contextual Factors

• Historical context, including the specific challenges, opportunities, and constraints faced by a president during their tenure, must be considered when evaluating their performance and legacy
• The prevailing political, economic, social, and international conditions of a president's era shape the priorities, decisions, and outcomes of their administration
• Comparing presidents across different historical periods requires careful consideration of the unique circumstances and evolving role of the presidency over time

Leadership Attributes

• Leadership qualities, such as vision, integrity, communication skills, and ability to inspire and unite the nation, are critical factors in assessing a president's effectiveness and impact
• A president's capacity to articulate a clear agenda, build coalitions, and navigate complex political landscapes contributes to their success in advancing their policy objectives and shaping public opinion
• Emotional intelligence, empathy, and the ability to connect with diverse constituencies are increasingly recognized as important leadership attributes for modern presidents

Handling Adversity

• Crisis management, or a president's ability to respond effectively to unexpected events, national emergencies, and major challenges, is a key aspect of their performance evaluation
• Presidents who demonstrate decisiveness, adaptability, and sound judgment under pressure, while communicating clearly and compassionately to the public, often earn higher marks in historical assessments (Abraham Lincoln during the Civil War, Franklin D. Roosevelt during the Great Depression and World War II, John F. Kennedy during the Cuban Missile Crisis)
• Conversely, presidents who appear overwhelmed, indecisive, or insensitive during times of crisis may face criticism and lower rankings (George W. Bush's response to Hurricane Katrina, Donald Trump's handling of the COVID-19 pandemic)

Enduring Influence

• Long-term impact, or the lasting consequences of a president's actions, policies, and leadership on American society, economy, and global standing, is a critical factor in assessing their overall performance and legacy
• Presidents who implement transformative policies, champion social progress, and steer the nation through pivotal moments in history are often recognized for their enduring positive influence (Abraham Lincoln's role in preserving the Union and abolishing slavery, Lyndon B. Johnson's Great Society programs and civil rights legislation)
• Conversely, presidents whose decisions and actions have negative long-term consequences or fail to address critical issues may be judged more harshly by history (Woodrow Wilson's handling of racial segregation and civil liberties, Richard Nixon's Watergate scandal and erosion of public trust in government)

Preserving Presidential Legacies

Presidential Libraries and Museums

• Presidential libraries, administered by the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), serve as repositories for the official records, documents, and artifacts of a president's administration
• These institutions, typically established in a president's home state, also function as museums, educational centers, and research facilities, providing public access to historical materials and interpretive exhibits on the life, career, and presidency of their namesake
• Presidential libraries play a crucial role in preserving and shaping the legacy of a president by collecting, organizing, and disseminating information about their tenure, achievements, and challenges
• The exhibits, programs, and resources offered by presidential libraries contribute to public understanding and scholarly analysis of a president's place in history, while also serving as a platform for the former president and their supporters to highlight positive aspects of their legacy (Jimmy Carter's post-presidency humanitarian work, Barack Obama's emphasis on community organizing and civic engagement)
• Critics argue that presidential libraries, often funded by private donations and influenced by the former president's associates, can present an overly favorable or selective portrayal of a president's record, requiring visitors and researchers to approach their content with a critical eye