The 's power to make treaties and executive agreements is crucial in shaping foreign policy. Treaties require approval, while executive agreements allow for quicker action. Both tools give the President flexibility in international relations.
However, these powers aren't unlimited. The Senate can influence treaties through ratification, and Congress can regulate executive agreements. This balance reflects the complex interplay between executive and legislative branches in foreign affairs.
Treaty Ratification and Termination
Senate's Role in Treaty Ratification
Top images from around the web for Senate's Role in Treaty Ratification
File:Senate to inaugurate hearings on Neutrality Act. Washington, D.C., March 29. Senator Key ... View original
Treaties require Senate's advice and consent to be ratified, a process outlined in the Constitution
President negotiates and signs treaties, but they do not take effect until ratified by a two-thirds majority vote in the Senate
Senate can attach reservations, understandings, or declarations to its advice and consent, which can modify or interpret provisions
Senate Foreign Relations Committee holds hearings on treaties and reports them to the full Senate for consideration
Treaty Termination and International Law
President has the power to terminate treaties, although this authority is not explicitly stated in the Constitution
(1979): Supreme Court case involving President Carter's termination of a defense treaty with Taiwan without Senate approval
Case dismissed as a political question, leaving the issue of treaty termination power unresolved
Under international law, treaties can be terminated by mutual agreement, a material breach by one party, or a fundamental change in circumstances (rebus sic stantibus doctrine)
(1969) codifies customary international law on treaties, including rules on termination and suspension
Executive Agreements
Types of Executive Agreements
Executive agreements are international agreements made by the President without Senate advice and consent
are based on the President's constitutional powers as commander-in-chief and chief diplomat
Examples: armistice agreements, recognition of foreign governments, and settling international claims
are authorized or approved by Congress through legislation or joint resolutions
Used for trade agreements (NAFTA), foreign assistance programs, and defense cooperation
Legal Status and Scope of Executive Agreements
Executive agreements have the same legal status as treaties under international law, but their domestic legal status is more complex
Supreme Court has upheld the constitutionality of executive agreements in cases like (1937) and (1942)
Executive agreements cannot override federal statutes or the Constitution, and they are subject to legislative oversight and regulation
The scope of executive agreements has expanded significantly since World War II, covering a wide range of foreign policy issues