6.2 Marius and Sulla

The rivalry between Marius and Sulla marked a turning point in Roman history. Their conflict escalated from personal competition to full-blown civil war, setting dangerous precedents for using military force in politics. This period saw the erosion of traditional Republican values and institutions.

Marius' military reforms created a professional army loyal to generals, while Sulla's dictatorship demonstrated the vulnerability of the Republic to autocratic rule. Their actions paved the way for future strongmen like Caesar and ultimately contributed to the fall of the Roman Republic.

Marius' Military Reforms and their Impact

Expansion of Military Recruitment and Standardization

Top images from around the web for Expansion of Military Recruitment and Standardization

• 

  Соціальна структура Стародавнього Риму — Вікіпедія View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Roman army - Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Соціальна структура Стародавнього Риму — Вікіпедія View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Roman army - Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 2

Top images from around the web for Expansion of Military Recruitment and Standardization

• 

  Соціальна структура Стародавнього Риму — Вікіпедія View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Roman army - Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Соціальна структура Стародавнього Риму — Вікіпедія View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Roman army - Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 2

• Abolished property qualifications for military service allowed landless citizens (capite censi) to enlist expanded the pool of potential recruits
• Restructured Roman legion into a more flexible and standardized unit replaced manipular system with cohorts as the primary tactical unit
• Introduced aquila (eagle) as the primary standard of the legion fostered sense of loyalty and identity among soldiers
• Redesigned pilum (javelin) with softer iron shaft made it more effective against enemy shields and prevented reuse by opponents
• Standardized and improved soldiers' equipment ensured each legionary was fully armed and armored at the state's expense
  • Included standardized weapons (gladius, pilum)
  • Provided uniform armor (lorica segmentata, galea)

Professionalization of the Roman Army

• Created a professional standing army with soldiers serving longer terms
  • Extended service periods from temporary campaigns to 16-20 year commitments
  • Provided land grants to veterans as retirement benefits
• Developed stronger loyalty of soldiers to their generals rather than the state
  • Generals became responsible for soldiers' pay and land grants
  • Personal relationships formed during extended campaigns
• Transformed Roman military into a more effective fighting force
  • Increased combat experience and skill due to longer service
  • Improved unit cohesion and tactical flexibility
• Created dangerous precedent for ambitious generals to use their armies for political gain
  • Examples: Sulla's march on Rome, Caesar's crossing of the Rubicon

Marius vs Sulla: Political Rivalry

Origins and Escalation of Conflict

• Rivalry began during Jugurthine War where tensions arose over credit for capturing Jugurtha
  • Sulla, serving under Marius, claimed primary role in Jugurtha's capture
  • Marius, as overall commander, received official recognition
• Marius' unprecedented seven consulships challenged traditional norms and threatened senatorial elite
  • Normal practice limited consuls to one term
  • Marius held office in 107, 104-100, and 86 BCE
• Social War (91-88 BCE) exacerbated tensions with both men competing for military glory and political influence
  • Marius and Sulla both served as commanders during the conflict
  • Rivalry intensified as they vied for prominent roles and achievements

Climax and Consequences of the Rivalry

• Conflict peaked when Marius attempted to take command of war against Mithridates VI of Pontus from Sulla
  • Marius used political maneuvering to have command transferred to him
  • Sulla refused to relinquish command, leading to his march on Rome in 88 BCE
• Sulla's march on Rome marked first time a Roman army was used against the city itself
  • Set dangerous precedent for future civil conflicts (Caesar, Octavian)
  • Demonstrated vulnerability of Roman political system to military intervention
• Rivalry resulted in periods of violent purges and proscriptions
  • Each leader targeted the other's supporters when in power
  • Examples: Sulla's proscriptions in 82 BCE, Marius' purge of Sulla's supporters in 87 BCE
• Conflict deeply divided Roman society and weakened foundations of Republican system
  • Created lasting factional divisions within Roman elite
  • Undermined traditional respect for law and constitutional norms

Sulla's Dictatorship and its Effects

Constitutional and Political Reforms

• Appointed dictator legibus faciendis et rei publicae constituendae causa in 82 BCE with unprecedented powers and no time limit
• Expanded Senate size from 300 to 600 members diluted power of established senatorial families and increased support base
  • Included many of Sulla's supporters and military officers
• Curtailed power of tribunes of the plebs limited their ability to propose legislation and veto senatorial decrees
  • Restricted tribunes from holding higher office after their term
• Introduced lex Cornelia de maiestate broadly defined crimes against the state provided legal basis for prosecuting political opponents
  • Expanded definition of treason to include various political actions
• Reorganized cursus honorum established stricter age requirements and intervals between offices to limit rapid political advancement
  • Set minimum ages for each office (quaestor at 30, praetor at 39, consul at 42)
  • Required two-year intervals between offices

Judicial and Administrative Changes

• Expanded and reorganized quaestiones perpetuae (permanent courts) created more structured legal system but increased senatorial control over courts
  • Established specific courts for different types of crimes (extortion, treason, murder)
  • Juries composed exclusively of senators, removing equestrian influence
• Voluntarily relinquished power in 79 BCE demonstrated commitment to Republican ideals
  • Retired to private life after implementing reforms
  • Attempted to set example for future leaders to respect constitutional norms
• Dictatorship set precedent for future autocratic rule and demonstrated vulnerability of Republican institutions
  • Showed potential for concentration of power in one individual
  • Reforms ultimately failed to prevent rise of future strongmen (Caesar, Augustus)

Marius and Sulla: The Decline of the Republic

Militarization of Roman Politics

• Marius' military reforms created professional army more loyal to individual generals than to the state
  • Soldiers depended on generals for pay, land grants, and career advancement
  • Weakened traditional civilian control of the military
• Rivalry normalized political violence and use of force to achieve political goals
  • Sulla's march on Rome (88 BCE) set precedent for using army in domestic politics
  • Future leaders like Caesar emulated this tactic (crossing the Rubicon, 49 BCE)
• Concentration of power in hands of successful generals paved way for rise of powerful individuals
  • Examples: Pompey's extraordinary commands, Caesar's long-term governorship of Gaul

Erosion of Republican Institutions and Values

• Proscriptions and purges carried out by both men weakened stability of Roman society
  • Resulted in deaths of thousands of political opponents and confiscation of property
  • Eroded trust in political institutions and rule of law
• Sulla's constitutional reforms failed to address underlying social and economic issues plaguing the Republic
  • Did not solve problems of wealth inequality and disenfranchisement of Italian allies
  • Focused on strengthening senatorial authority rather than broader systemic reforms
• Actions and reforms collectively contributed to militarization of Roman politics and erosion of Republican values
  • Undermined traditional checks and balances within the system
  • Created precedent for personal power overriding institutional authority
• Accelerated Republic's decline and set stage for its eventual transformation into the Principate
  • Weakened resistance to autocratic rule
  • Prepared Roman society for acceptance of Augustus' "First Citizen" role and de facto monarchy