1.3 Fitness and inclusive fitness

Fitness and inclusive fitness are key concepts in animal behavior, explaining why certain traits evolve. These ideas help us understand how animals maximize their genetic contribution to future generations, either through direct reproduction or by helping relatives.

Inclusive fitness theory expands on traditional fitness by considering how animals can increase their genetic success indirectly. This explains seemingly altruistic behaviors, like alarm calls in meerkats or cooperative breeding in wild dogs, which benefit relatives at a personal cost.

Defining fitness

• Fitness is a central concept in evolutionary biology that measures an individual's ability to survive and reproduce in a given environment
• In the context of animal behavior, fitness helps explain why certain behaviors evolve and persist in populations over time

Fitness as reproductive success

Top images from around the web for Fitness as reproductive success

• 

  Funny Pictures Of Lion Looking Proud And Passionate As He Mates With A Lioness View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  What is Sexual Selection? – Introductory Biology: Evolutionary and Ecological Perspectives View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Mate choice - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Funny Pictures Of Lion Looking Proud And Passionate As He Mates With A Lioness View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  What is Sexual Selection? – Introductory Biology: Evolutionary and Ecological Perspectives View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Fitness as reproductive success

• 

  Funny Pictures Of Lion Looking Proud And Passionate As He Mates With A Lioness View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  What is Sexual Selection? – Introductory Biology: Evolutionary and Ecological Perspectives View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Mate choice - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Funny Pictures Of Lion Looking Proud And Passionate As He Mates With A Lioness View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  What is Sexual Selection? – Introductory Biology: Evolutionary and Ecological Perspectives View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Fitness is often equated with reproductive success, which is the number of offspring an individual produces that survive to reproductive age
• Individuals with higher reproductive success are considered more fit and their genes are more likely to be passed on to future generations
• Examples of behaviors that increase reproductive success include effective foraging strategies (lions hunting in prides) and successful mate attraction (peacock's elaborate tail)

Direct vs indirect fitness

• Direct fitness refers to an individual's own reproductive success, while indirect fitness includes the reproductive success of genetic relatives
• Behaviors that benefit an individual's direct fitness include securing resources for oneself and attracting mates
• Indirect fitness can be increased through behaviors that help relatives survive and reproduce, such as alarm calls warning of predators (meerkats) or cooperative breeding (African wild dogs)

Genotype frequency changes

• Fitness ultimately leads to changes in the frequency of genotypes in a population over generations
• Genotypes associated with higher fitness will increase in frequency, while those with lower fitness will decrease
• This process of differential survival and reproduction based on fitness is the driving force behind evolutionary change

Measuring fitness

• Quantifying fitness is essential for understanding the evolution of animal behavior and making predictions about future evolutionary changes
• Various methods and metrics are used to measure fitness, each with its own advantages and limitations

Absolute vs relative fitness

• Absolute fitness is the total number of surviving offspring produced by an individual, while relative fitness compares an individual's fitness to the average fitness of the population
• Relative fitness is often more informative as it accounts for the context of the population and environmental conditions
• For example, producing 10 offspring may represent high absolute fitness, but if the population average is 20 offspring, the relative fitness would be considered low

Fitness components

• Fitness can be broken down into various components, such as survival, mating success, and fecundity (number of offspring produced)
• Studying these components separately can provide insights into the specific factors contributing to an individual's overall fitness
• Example: In many bird species, both survival (avoiding predators) and mating success (attracting mates with colorful plumage) contribute to overall fitness

Challenges in quantifying fitness

• Measuring fitness in wild populations can be challenging due to the difficulty of tracking individuals over their lifetimes and accurately assessing reproductive success
• Fitness can also be context-dependent, varying across different environments or life stages, making it difficult to obtain a comprehensive measure
• Long-term studies and the use of genetic markers have helped overcome some of these challenges, but measuring fitness remains a complex task

Inclusive fitness theory

• Inclusive fitness theory, proposed by W.D. Hamilton, is an extension of classical fitness concepts that incorporates the effects of an individual's actions on the fitness of genetic relatives
• This theory helps explain the evolution of seemingly altruistic behaviors that benefit others at a cost to the individual

Concept of inclusive fitness

• Inclusive fitness is the sum of an individual's direct fitness (personal reproductive success) and indirect fitness (the reproductive success of genetic relatives)
• An individual's inclusive fitness can be increased by behaviors that enhance the fitness of close relatives, even if those behaviors come at a personal cost
• Example: In many social insects, workers forgo reproduction to help raise the queen's offspring, increasing their indirect fitness through shared genes

Direct fitness benefits

• Direct fitness benefits arise from behaviors that directly increase an individual's own reproductive success
• These benefits can include access to resources, increased mating opportunities, or improved survival
• Example: Male lions defend territories to secure access to females and increase their direct fitness

Indirect fitness benefits

• Indirect fitness benefits result from behaviors that increase the reproductive success of an individual's genetic relatives
• These benefits are proportional to the degree of relatedness between the individual and the beneficiaries of the behavior
• Examples of behaviors that provide indirect fitness benefits include cooperative breeding (meerkats), food sharing (vampire bats), and alarm calls (ground squirrels)

Kin selection

• Kin selection is the evolutionary process by which traits that benefit genetic relatives are favored by natural selection, even if those traits are costly to the individual
• Kin selection is a key component of inclusive fitness theory and helps explain the evolution of altruistic behaviors

Genetic relatedness

• Genetic relatedness refers to the proportion of genes shared between individuals due to common ancestry
• Relatedness is a crucial factor in kin selection, as individuals are more likely to engage in behaviors that benefit close relatives who share a larger proportion of their genes
• Example: In many bird species, siblings often cooperate to defend their shared territory or help raise each other's offspring

Hamilton's rule

• Hamilton's rule states that a behavior will be favored by natural selection if the benefits to the recipient (B), multiplied by the relatedness between the actor and recipient (r), outweigh the costs to the actor (C)
• Mathematically, this is expressed as $rB > C$
• This rule helps predict when altruistic behaviors will evolve and provides a framework for understanding the role of relatedness in kin selection

Altruism vs selfishness

• Altruism refers to behaviors that benefit others at a cost to the individual, while selfishness involves behaviors that benefit the individual at the expense of others
• Kin selection theory explains how altruistic behaviors can evolve when directed towards genetic relatives, as the indirect fitness benefits can outweigh the personal costs
• Example: In many social insects, workers altruistically forgo reproduction to help raise the queen's offspring, while in other species, individuals selfishly hoard resources for themselves

Evolutionary stable strategies

• Evolutionary game theory is a mathematical approach used to study the evolution of behavioral strategies in animal populations
• This approach helps identify evolutionarily stable strategies (ESS) that, once adopted by a population, cannot be invaded by alternative strategies

Game theory in animal behavior

• Game theory models the interactions between individuals as a series of strategic decisions, with the outcomes dependent on the choices made by all participants
• In animal behavior, game theory is used to analyze the evolution of behaviors such as cooperation, aggression, and mating strategies
• Example: The hawk-dove game models the evolution of aggressive (hawk) and peaceful (dove) strategies in contests over resources

Nash equilibrium

• A Nash equilibrium is a set of strategies in which no individual can improve their fitness by unilaterally changing their strategy
• In the context of animal behavior, a Nash equilibrium represents a stable state where all individuals are using the best strategy given the strategies of others in the population
• Example: In the producer-scrounger game, a Nash equilibrium is reached when the proportion of producers (individuals who search for food) and scroungers (individuals who steal food from producers) is such that neither strategy can increase its fitness by changing

Evolutionarily stable strategies (ESS)

• An evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS) is a Nash equilibrium that is resistant to invasion by alternative strategies
• Once an ESS is adopted by a population, it cannot be replaced by any other strategy, as individuals using the ESS will have higher fitness than those using alternative strategies
• Examples of ESS in animal behavior include the ratio of males to females in a population (Fisher's principle) and the balance between cooperation and defection in social interactions (prisoner's dilemma)

Inclusive fitness in eusocial insects

• Eusocial insects, such as ants, bees, and wasps, exhibit complex social structures and behaviors that have evolved through inclusive fitness and kin selection
• The study of eusocial insects has provided valuable insights into the role of relatedness and indirect fitness benefits in shaping animal behavior

Haplodiploidy hypothesis

• The haplodiploidy hypothesis proposes that the high relatedness between sisters in haplodiploid insects (males develop from unfertilized eggs and are haploid, while females develop from fertilized eggs and are diploid) promotes the evolution of altruistic behaviors
• In haplodiploid systems, sisters share 75% of their genes on average, which is higher than the 50% shared between parents and offspring
• This high relatedness is thought to favor the evolution of worker castes that forgo reproduction to help raise the queen's offspring, as they gain indirect fitness benefits through their sisters

Worker policing

• Worker policing refers to the behavior of worker insects that prevent other workers from reproducing, ensuring that only the queen's offspring are reared
• This behavior is thought to have evolved through kin selection, as workers are more related to the queen's offspring than to the offspring of other workers
• Example: In honeybees, workers eat the eggs laid by other workers, maintaining the reproductive dominance of the queen

Queen-worker conflicts

• Queen-worker conflicts arise when the interests of the queen and workers diverge, such as in the sex ratio of offspring or the timing of colony reproduction
• These conflicts are mediated by inclusive fitness, as both the queen and workers seek to maximize their own inclusive fitness
• Example: In many ant species, workers prefer to invest more in female offspring (their sisters), while the queen prefers an equal investment in males and females

Criticism and limitations

• While inclusive fitness theory has been widely influential in the study of animal behavior, it has also faced criticism and challenges
• Understanding these limitations is important for developing a comprehensive view of the factors shaping the evolution of behavior

Challenges to inclusive fitness theory

• Some critics argue that inclusive fitness theory is unnecessarily complex and that alternative models, such as multilevel selection theory, can explain the evolution of altruistic behaviors more parsimoniously
• Others have questioned the assumptions underlying inclusive fitness theory, such as the additivity of fitness effects and the accuracy of relatedness estimates
• Empirical studies have sometimes failed to find the predicted relationships between relatedness and altruistic behavior, suggesting that other factors may also play important roles

Alternative explanations for altruism

• Reciprocal altruism, where individuals help others in expectation of future reciprocation, has been proposed as an alternative explanation for some altruistic behaviors
• Group selection, where traits that benefit the group as a whole are favored even if they are costly to individuals, has also been invoked to explain the evolution of altruism
• Example: In vampire bats, reciprocal altruism in the form of food sharing among unrelated individuals has been observed, suggesting that direct benefits can also drive seemingly altruistic behaviors

Importance of non-additive interactions

• Inclusive fitness theory assumes that the fitness effects of genes are additive, meaning that the fitness of an individual is the sum of the effects of each gene
• However, non-additive interactions, such as epistasis (interactions between genes) and genotype-by-environment interactions, can also influence fitness outcomes
• Ignoring these non-additive effects can lead to inaccurate predictions and an incomplete understanding of the factors shaping animal behavior
• Example: In some social insects, the expression of altruistic behaviors has been shown to depend on the interaction between genotype and environmental factors, such as colony size or resource availability