5.1 Parallel algorithms

Parallel algorithms revolutionize computing by harnessing multiple processors to tackle complex problems efficiently. They come in various types, including shared memory and distributed memory approaches, each with unique strengths and challenges.

Designing effective parallel algorithms involves careful consideration of decomposition strategies, communication methods, and synchronization techniques. Load balancing, performance metrics, and design patterns play crucial roles in optimizing parallel algorithm performance and scalability.

Types of parallel algorithms

• Parallel algorithms are designed to leverage multiple processors or cores to solve computational problems more efficiently
• Types of parallel algorithms include shared memory algorithms, distributed memory algorithms, and hybrid algorithms that combine both approaches
• The choice of parallel algorithm depends on factors such as the problem size, available hardware resources, and communication patterns between parallel tasks

Shared memory vs distributed memory

• Shared memory parallel algorithms assume all processors have access to a common shared memory space, allowing for efficient communication and data sharing between parallel tasks
• Distributed memory parallel algorithms assume each processor has its own local memory, requiring explicit communication between processors to exchange data
• Shared memory algorithms are generally easier to implement but may face scalability limitations, while distributed memory algorithms can scale to larger problem sizes but require careful management of communication and synchronization

Decomposition strategies for parallelization

Domain decomposition

Top images from around the web for Domain decomposition

• 

  Python for Scientific Computing View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Study on the calculational framework development of the advanced numerical reactor ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Evaluation of Single-Node Performance of Parallel Algorithms for Multigroup Monte ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Python for Scientific Computing View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Study on the calculational framework development of the advanced numerical reactor ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Domain decomposition

• 

  Python for Scientific Computing View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Study on the calculational framework development of the advanced numerical reactor ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Evaluation of Single-Node Performance of Parallel Algorithms for Multigroup Monte ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Python for Scientific Computing View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Study on the calculational framework development of the advanced numerical reactor ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Involves partitioning the problem domain into smaller subdomains that can be processed independently by different processors
• Commonly used in scientific simulations (computational fluid dynamics) and image processing (parallel image filtering)
• Requires careful consideration of data dependencies and communication patterns between subdomains to ensure correct results and minimize overhead

Functional decomposition

• Focuses on identifying independent or loosely coupled tasks within an algorithm that can be executed concurrently by different processors
• Suitable for algorithms with clear functional divisions (parallel sorting algorithms) or pipeline-based processing (video encoding)
• Requires analysis of data flow and dependencies between tasks to ensure correct execution order and avoid race conditions

Communication in parallel algorithms

Message passing

• Communication paradigm where parallel tasks exchange data and synchronize through explicit messages sent between processors
• Commonly used in distributed memory algorithms and supported by libraries (Message Passing Interface (MPI))
• Requires careful design of communication patterns to minimize latency and bandwidth overhead, especially for large-scale parallel systems

Shared memory access

• Communication approach where parallel tasks share a common memory space and communicate through reads and writes to shared variables
• Provides fast communication but requires synchronization mechanisms (locks, semaphores) to prevent data races and ensure consistency
• Suitable for shared memory algorithms and supported by parallel programming languages (OpenMP) and libraries (Pthreads)

Synchronization of parallel tasks

Barriers

• Synchronization points where all parallel tasks must reach before proceeding further, ensuring a consistent state across processors
• Used to enforce dependencies between parallel phases and prevent data races
• Can introduce performance overhead if not carefully placed, as faster tasks may need to wait for slower ones to catch up

Mutual exclusion

• Mechanisms (locks, semaphores) that ensure only one parallel task can access a shared resource or critical section at a time, preventing data races and inconsistencies
• Requires careful design to avoid deadlocks (circular wait for locks) and minimize contention, which can lead to performance degradation
• Alternatives like lock-free and wait-free algorithms can provide better scalability in some cases

Load balancing techniques

Static load balancing

• Partitions the workload evenly across processors before execution, assuming a priori knowledge of task sizes and computational requirements
• Simple to implement but may lead to load imbalance if task sizes vary or the system is heterogeneous
• Suitable for problems with predictable and uniform workloads (matrix multiplication)

Dynamic load balancing

• Distributes tasks to processors dynamically during execution, adapting to variations in task sizes and system load
• Can provide better load balance and resource utilization but incurs runtime overhead for task distribution and monitoring
• Techniques include work stealing (idle processors steal tasks from busy ones) and task pools (centralized or distributed queues of tasks)

Performance metrics for parallel algorithms

Speedup

• Measures the performance improvement of a parallel algorithm compared to its sequential counterpart, calculated as the ratio of sequential execution time to parallel execution time
• Ideal speedup is linear (proportional to the number of processors), but in practice, it is limited by factors like communication overhead and load imbalance
• Amdahl's law provides an upper bound on speedup based on the fraction of the algorithm that can be parallelized

Efficiency

• Indicates how well a parallel algorithm utilizes the available processors, calculated as the ratio of speedup to the number of processors
• Ideal efficiency is 1 (perfect utilization), but in practice, it decreases as the number of processors increases due to overhead and diminishing returns
• Efficiency can be improved by minimizing communication, balancing load, and exploiting locality

Scalability

• Measures how well a parallel algorithm performs as the problem size and the number of processors increase
• Strong scaling refers to the ability to solve a fixed-size problem faster with more processors, while weak scaling refers to the ability to solve larger problems with more processors in the same amount of time
• Scalability is influenced by factors like communication-to-computation ratio, load balance, and resource contention

Parallel algorithm design patterns

Embarrassingly parallel

• Parallel tasks are completely independent and require minimal or no communication, making parallelization straightforward
• Examples include Monte Carlo simulations and brute-force searches
• Can achieve near-linear speedup if load is balanced and there is negligible overhead

Divide and conquer

• Recursively divides a problem into smaller subproblems that can be solved independently, then combines the results to obtain the final solution
• Parallel implementations (parallel merge sort) exploit the independence of subproblems to achieve parallelism
• Requires efficient partitioning and combining steps to minimize overhead and ensure load balance

Pipeline

• Decomposes a problem into a series of stages, where each stage performs a specific operation on the data and passes the result to the next stage
• Parallelism is achieved by executing different stages concurrently on different data items
• Suitable for streaming applications (video processing) and algorithms with clear data flow between stages

Master-worker

• A master process generates tasks and distributes them to worker processes, which perform the actual computation and return the results to the master
• Provides a simple and flexible way to parallelize independent tasks and can adapt to heterogeneous systems
• Requires careful design of task granularity and distribution to minimize communication overhead and ensure load balance

Challenges in parallel algorithm design

Data dependencies

• Occur when the computation of one task depends on the results of another task, limiting the potential for parallelism
• Require careful analysis and techniques (dependency graphs, data flow analysis) to identify and exploit parallelism while preserving correctness
• May necessitate communication or synchronization between parallel tasks to satisfy dependencies

Race conditions

• Arise when multiple parallel tasks access and modify shared data concurrently, leading to non-deterministic behavior and incorrect results
• Require synchronization mechanisms (locks, atomics) to ensure mutual exclusion and maintain data consistency
• Can be difficult to detect and debug, as they may manifest only under specific interleavings of parallel execution

Deadlocks

• Occur when parallel tasks are stuck waiting for each other to release resources (locks), leading to a circular dependency and program stall
• Can be caused by incorrect use of synchronization primitives or resource allocation strategies
• Prevention techniques include careful lock ordering, timeout mechanisms, and deadlock detection and recovery algorithms

Tools for parallel algorithm development

Parallel programming languages

• Extend sequential programming languages with constructs for expressing parallelism and synchronization
• Examples include Chapel, Cilk, and X10, which provide high-level abstractions for parallel loops, tasks, and data structures
• Can simplify parallel algorithm development by hiding low-level details and providing built-in support for common parallel patterns

Parallel libraries

• Provide reusable implementations of parallel algorithms and data structures that can be integrated into existing codebases
• Examples include Intel Threading Building Blocks (TBB) for shared memory parallelism and the Message Passing Interface (MPI) for distributed memory parallelism
• Can accelerate development and improve performance by leveraging optimized and tested implementations

Parallel frameworks

• Offer high-level APIs and runtime systems for developing and executing parallel applications on various platforms
• Examples include Apache Hadoop for distributed data processing, Apache Spark for big data analytics, and NVIDIA CUDA for GPU programming
• Can abstract away platform-specific details and provide features like load balancing, fault tolerance, and data distribution

Applications of parallel algorithms

Scientific simulations

• Parallel algorithms are essential for large-scale scientific simulations (climate modeling, molecular dynamics) that require processing vast amounts of data and performing complex computations
• Domain decomposition techniques are commonly used to partition the simulated space and distribute the workload across parallel processors
• Parallel algorithms enable higher resolution simulations, faster turnaround times, and the ability to study more complex phenomena

Machine learning

• Parallel algorithms are crucial for training large-scale machine learning models (deep neural networks) on massive datasets
• Data parallelism techniques (distributed training) allow multiple processors to work on different subsets of the training data, while model parallelism techniques (pipeline parallelism) distribute the computation of different layers across processors
• Parallel algorithms can significantly reduce training times and enable the development of more sophisticated and accurate models

Data mining

• Parallel algorithms are used to extract insights and patterns from large datasets in various domains (business, healthcare, social media)
• Techniques like parallel association rule mining, parallel clustering, and parallel classification can efficiently process massive datasets by distributing the computation across multiple processors
• Parallel algorithms enable faster and more comprehensive analysis of complex datasets, leading to better decision-making and knowledge discovery

Image processing

• Parallel algorithms are employed to accelerate various image processing tasks (filtering, segmentation, object detection) on large images or video streams
• Domain decomposition techniques (spatial partitioning) can be used to divide an image into smaller tiles that can be processed independently by different processors
• Parallel algorithms can significantly speed up image processing pipelines, enabling real-time applications (video surveillance, medical imaging) and faster processing of high-resolution images