8.2 Matching pursuit

Matching pursuit is a powerful algorithm for decomposing signals into sparse representations using overcomplete dictionaries. It iteratively selects the best matching atoms, updating the residual signal until a desired accuracy is achieved.

This technique connects to broader approximation theory by exploiting signal sparsity and structure. It offers adaptability to signal characteristics and finds applications in denoising, compression, and feature extraction across various domains.

Matching pursuit algorithm

• Iterative algorithm used to decompose a signal into a linear combination of waveforms selected from an overcomplete dictionary
• Aims to find the best matching projections of multidimensional data onto an overcomplete dictionary
• Key components include sparse signal representation, overcomplete dictionaries, atom selection process, residual signal updating, and stopping criteria

Sparse signal representation

Top images from around the web for Sparse signal representation

• 

  Frontiers | An Intelligent EEG Classification Methodology Based on Sparse Representation ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  RobOMP: Robust variants of Orthogonal Matching Pursuit for sparse representations [PeerJ] View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | An Intelligent EEG Classification Methodology Based on Sparse Representation ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  RobOMP: Robust variants of Orthogonal Matching Pursuit for sparse representations [PeerJ] View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 2

Top images from around the web for Sparse signal representation

• 

  Frontiers | An Intelligent EEG Classification Methodology Based on Sparse Representation ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  RobOMP: Robust variants of Orthogonal Matching Pursuit for sparse representations [PeerJ] View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | An Intelligent EEG Classification Methodology Based on Sparse Representation ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  RobOMP: Robust variants of Orthogonal Matching Pursuit for sparse representations [PeerJ] View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 2

• Represents a signal using a small number of non-zero coefficients
• Exploits the inherent structure and redundancy in the signal
• Enables efficient storage, transmission, and processing of signals
• Examples include audio signals with few active frequency components and images with sparse edges or textures

Overcomplete dictionaries

• Collections of waveforms (atoms) used to represent the signal
• Contain more atoms than the signal dimension, providing flexibility in representation
• Enable the selection of the most suitable atoms for a given signal
• Examples include Fourier bases, wavelet bases, and Gabor frames

Atom selection process

• Iteratively selects the dictionary atom that best matches the current residual signal
• Computes the inner product between the residual and each dictionary atom
• Selects the atom with the highest absolute inner product value
• Updates the residual by subtracting the contribution of the selected atom

Residual signal updating

• Subtracts the contribution of the selected atom from the current residual signal
• Ensures that the remaining residual is orthogonal to the selected atom
• Prepares the residual for the next iteration of atom selection
• Continues until a desired sparsity level or approximation accuracy is achieved

Stopping criteria

• Determines when to terminate the matching pursuit algorithm
• Can be based on a fixed number of iterations, a target sparsity level, or an approximation error threshold
• Balances the trade-off between representation accuracy and computational complexity
• Examples include stopping after a certain number of atoms are selected or when the residual energy falls below a threshold

Orthogonal matching pursuit

• Extension of the matching pursuit algorithm that includes an orthogonalization step
• Ensures that the selected atoms are orthogonal to each other
• Improves the convergence rate and reduces the number of iterations required for a given approximation accuracy

Orthogonalization step

• Projects the selected atoms onto the subspace orthogonal to the previously selected atoms
• Ensures that the selected atoms are linearly independent and orthogonal to each other
• Reduces the redundancy in the representation and improves the stability of the algorithm
• Can be implemented using Gram-Schmidt orthogonalization or QR decomposition

Improved convergence

• Orthogonal matching pursuit converges faster than the standard matching pursuit algorithm
• Orthogonalization step ensures that the residual is always orthogonal to the selected atoms
• Reduces the number of iterations required to achieve a desired approximation accuracy
• Provides a more efficient and stable representation of the signal

Applications of matching pursuit

• Matching pursuit and its variants have found applications in various signal processing tasks
• Exploits the sparsity and structure of signals to achieve efficient representations and processing
• Examples include signal denoising, image compression, and feature extraction

Signal denoising

• Represents the noisy signal using a sparse set of dictionary atoms
• Assumes that the signal has a sparse representation while the noise is distributed across all atoms
• Thresholds the coefficients to remove the noise components and reconstruct the clean signal
• Applies to audio denoising, image denoising, and biomedical signal processing

Image compression

• Represents an image using a sparse set of dictionary atoms
• Exploits the spatial redundancy and structure in the image
• Encodes the selected atoms and their coefficients to achieve compression
• Reconstructs the image from the sparse representation during decompression
• Offers high compression ratios while preserving perceptual quality

Feature extraction

• Represents signals or data using a sparse set of discriminative atoms
• Selects atoms that capture the essential characteristics or patterns in the data
• Uses the sparse representation as a feature vector for classification or clustering tasks
• Applies to audio classification, image recognition, and biomedical signal analysis

Comparison of matching pursuit variants

• Several variants of the matching pursuit algorithm have been proposed to improve its performance and efficiency
• These variants differ in their atom selection strategies, orthogonalization steps, and convergence properties
• Examples include optimized orthogonal matching pursuit, generalized orthogonal matching pursuit, and compressive sampling matching pursuit

Optimized orthogonal matching pursuit

• Selects multiple atoms at each iteration instead of a single atom
• Uses a least-squares optimization to update the coefficients of the selected atoms
• Improves the convergence rate and reduces the computational complexity compared to the standard orthogonal matching pursuit
• Suitable for high-dimensional signals and large dictionaries

Generalized orthogonal matching pursuit

• Allows for the selection of multiple atoms at each iteration
• Uses a generalized orthogonalization step to ensure the linear independence of the selected atoms
• Provides a more flexible and adaptive representation of the signal
• Applicable to signals with structured sparsity patterns or group sparsity

Compressive sampling matching pursuit

• Combines matching pursuit with compressive sampling principles
• Recovers sparse signals from a small number of random linear measurements
• Exploits the sparsity prior and the incoherence between the measurement matrix and the dictionary
• Enables efficient acquisition and reconstruction of sparse signals in compressed sensing applications

Advantages vs disadvantages

• Matching pursuit and its variants offer several advantages and disadvantages compared to other approximation methods
• Understanding these trade-offs is crucial for selecting the appropriate algorithm for a given application

Adaptability to signal structure

• Matching pursuit can adapt to the specific structure and characteristics of the signal
• Overcomplete dictionaries provide a rich set of waveforms to represent the signal
• Allows for the selection of the most suitable atoms for a given signal
• Particularly effective for signals with sparse and structured representations

Computational complexity

• Matching pursuit algorithms involve iterative atom selection and residual updating
• Computational complexity grows with the size of the dictionary and the number of iterations
• Orthogonal matching pursuit variants have higher complexity due to the orthogonalization step
• Trade-off between representation accuracy and computational efficiency

Sensitivity to noise

• Matching pursuit algorithms can be sensitive to noise in the signal
• Noise can affect the atom selection process and lead to suboptimal representations
• Orthogonal matching pursuit variants are more robust to noise due to the orthogonalization step
• Proper regularization and thresholding techniques can help mitigate the impact of noise

Relationship to other approximation methods

• Matching pursuit is related to other sparse approximation and regression methods
• These methods aim to find sparse representations of signals or estimate sparse models from data
• Examples include basis pursuit, least angle regression, and wavelet shrinkage

Basis pursuit

• Formulates the sparse approximation problem as a convex optimization problem
• Minimizes the $\ell_1$-norm of the coefficients subject to a reconstruction error constraint
• Provides a global optimum solution but requires solving a linear program
• Related to matching pursuit through the pursuit of sparse representations

Least angle regression

• Iterative algorithm for solving the regularized least squares problem
• Selects variables (atoms) in a stepwise manner based on their correlation with the residual
• Similar to matching pursuit in terms of iterative atom selection
• Provides a path of solutions with varying sparsity levels

Wavelet shrinkage

• Thresholds the wavelet coefficients of a signal to obtain a sparse representation
• Assumes that the signal is sparse in the wavelet domain
• Related to matching pursuit in terms of exploiting sparsity in a transform domain
• Offers fast and efficient denoising and compression of signals