2.1 Moral philosophy and ethical frameworks

Moral philosophy and ethical frameworks form the backbone of AI ethics. These concepts help us understand right and wrong, moral agency, and decision-making, which are crucial when developing AI systems that interact with humans and make choices.

Various ethical approaches, from utilitarianism to virtue ethics, offer different perspectives on how AI should behave. While traditional ethics provide a starting point, the unique challenges of AI require us to adapt and create new frameworks to guide its development and use.

Key Concepts in AI Ethics

Foundations of Moral Philosophy

Top images from around the web for Foundations of Moral Philosophy

• 

  The State of AI Ethics Report (Volume 5) View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  State of AI Ethics | Montreal AI Ethics Institute View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Responsible AI and moral responsibility: a common appreciation | AI and Ethics View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The State of AI Ethics Report (Volume 5) View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  State of AI Ethics | Montreal AI Ethics Institute View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Foundations of Moral Philosophy

• 

  The State of AI Ethics Report (Volume 5) View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  State of AI Ethics | Montreal AI Ethics Institute View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Responsible AI and moral responsibility: a common appreciation | AI and Ethics View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The State of AI Ethics Report (Volume 5) View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  State of AI Ethics | Montreal AI Ethics Institute View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Moral philosophy examines questions of right and wrong, good and bad, and the nature of moral reasoning and decision-making
• Moral agency involves the capacity to make moral judgments and be held accountable for actions
• Moral responsibility refers to the obligation to act ethically and accept consequences of one's actions
• Moral status determines which entities deserve moral consideration (humans, animals, AI)
• Moral decision-making evaluates choices and actions based on ethical principles

Branches of Ethics Relevant to AI

• Normative ethics determines morally right or wrong actions, crucial for ethical AI behavior guidelines
• Meta-ethics examines the nature of ethical statements and moral truths, relevant to AI ethics foundations
• Applied ethics addresses specific moral issues in practical contexts (medical ethics, business ethics)

Key Ethical Principles for AI

• Moral universalism holds that ethical principles should apply equally to all moral agents
• Moral uncertainty acknowledges difficulties in determining the correct moral theory for AI systems
• Ethical pluralism recognizes multiple valid ethical frameworks for AI decision-making

Ethical Frameworks for AI

Consequentialist Approaches

• Utilitarianism maximizes overall well-being or happiness (developed by Bentham and Mill)
• Rule consequentialism evaluates actions based on the consequences of everyone following that rule
• Prioritarianism gives greater weight to benefits for worse-off individuals

Deontological Frameworks

• Kantian ethics emphasizes moral rules and duties regardless of consequences
• Rights-based ethics focuses on protecting fundamental human rights in AI systems
• Prima facie duties balance multiple ethical obligations (developed by W.D. Ross)

Virtue and Care-Based Ethics

• Virtue ethics cultivates moral character traits in AI systems (honesty, compassion)
• Care ethics emphasizes empathy and relationships in AI decision-making
• Ethics of care considers contextual factors and individual needs

Social and Justice-Oriented Frameworks

• Social contract theory prioritizes fairness and equality in AI decision-making (Hobbes, Rawls)
• Capabilities approach focuses on enhancing human freedoms and opportunities (developed by Sen and Nussbaum)
• Distributive justice theories address fair allocation of resources and benefits in AI systems

Principlism and Hybrid Approaches

• Principlism applies four key principles: autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice
• Value-sensitive design incorporates ethical values throughout the AI development process
• Multi-level utilitarianism combines rule-based and act-based utilitarian considerations

Traditional Ethics vs AI

Strengths of Applying Traditional Ethics to AI

• Established frameworks provide starting points for AI ethical guidelines
• Utilitarianism aligns with AI's data-driven nature for quantifiable outcomes
• Deontological approaches offer clear rules for AI behavior in various situations
• Virtue ethics presents a way to imbue AI systems with desirable traits (honesty, fairness)

Limitations and Challenges

• Human-centric theories may not fully apply to non-human AI systems (consciousness, intentionality)
• AI's speed and scale of operation require adaptations to traditional ethical theories
• Potential superintelligent AI surpassing human cognition may need new ethical frameworks
• Translating human virtues into computational terms poses significant challenges

Addressing Ethical Complexities in AI

• Interdisciplinary collaboration between philosophers, ethicists, and AI researchers needed
• Developing hybrid ethical frameworks combining multiple approaches for AI systems
• Incorporating ethical considerations throughout the AI development lifecycle
• Creating flexible ethical guidelines adaptable to evolving AI capabilities and applications