9.2 Layer 2 solutions and state channels

Layer 2 solutions are game-changers for blockchain scalability. These protocols built on top of existing networks like Bitcoin and Ethereum offload transactions from the main chain, enabling faster and cheaper processing without compromising security.

State channels, sidechains, and rollups are popular Layer 2 solutions, each with unique trade-offs. They allow for off-chain transactions, instant finality, lower fees, and increased privacy, making blockchain more practical for everyday use cases.

Layer 2 Solutions

Layer 2 solutions for scalability

Top images from around the web for Layer 2 solutions for scalability

• 

  Frontiers | High-Level Design and Rapid Implementation of a Clinical and Non-clinical Blockchain ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Million-User DApps on Ethereum: An Introduction to Application-Specific Sidechains View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Decentralized Network Governance: Blockchain Technology and the Future of Regulation View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | High-Level Design and Rapid Implementation of a Clinical and Non-clinical Blockchain ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Million-User DApps on Ethereum: An Introduction to Application-Specific Sidechains View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Layer 2 solutions for scalability

• 

  Frontiers | High-Level Design and Rapid Implementation of a Clinical and Non-clinical Blockchain ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Million-User DApps on Ethereum: An Introduction to Application-Specific Sidechains View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Decentralized Network Governance: Blockchain Technology and the Future of Regulation View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | High-Level Design and Rapid Implementation of a Clinical and Non-clinical Blockchain ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Million-User DApps on Ethereum: An Introduction to Application-Specific Sidechains View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Protocols built on top of existing blockchain networks (Bitcoin, Ethereum)
  • Improve scalability and transaction throughput without compromising security
  • Offload transactions from the main blockchain (Layer 1) to reduce congestion
• Process transactions off-chain for faster and cheaper processing
  • Batched and settled on the main chain periodically or when disputes arise
  • Reduces load on the main blockchain enabling higher transaction volumes
• Examples include state channels (Lightning Network), sidechains (Plasma), and rollups (Optimistic Rollups, Zero-Knowledge Rollups)
  • Each solution has its own trade-offs in terms of security, scalability, and decentralization
  • Choice depends on the specific use case and requirements of the application

State channels for off-chain transactions

• Two-way communication channels established off-chain directly between participants (Alice and Bob)
  • Allows for multiple transactions without interacting with the main blockchain
  • Participants can conduct transactions privately and securely updating the state of the channel with each transaction
• Final state is settled on the main blockchain when the channel is closed
  • Participants sign a transaction reflecting the final state and broadcast it to the network
  • Main chain smart contract verifies the signatures and settles the final balances
• Benefits include instant transaction finality, lower fees, and increased privacy
  • Transactions are not subject to block confirmation times and can be processed instantly
  • Most transactions occur off-chain reducing the fees paid to miners
  • Transactions are not broadcast to the entire network enhancing privacy

Comparison of Layer 2 solutions

• Lightning Network designed for Bitcoin but adaptable to other cryptocurrencies
  1. Uses a network of bidirectional payment channels for high-frequency, low-value transactions (micropayments)
  2. Relies on a punishment mechanism to discourage malicious behavior by penalizing dishonest participants
  3. Suitable for applications like instant payments, gaming, and content monetization
• Plasma proposed by Vitalik Buterin and Joseph Poon for Ethereum
  1. Uses child chains anchored to the main blockchain with their own consensus mechanisms and transaction types
  2. Supports general-purpose smart contracts and complex transactions beyond simple payments
  3. Relies on fraud proofs to ensure the validity of child chain transactions and allow users to challenge invalid ones
  4. Suitable for applications like decentralized exchanges, prediction markets, and games

Security of Layer 2 solutions

• Layer 2 solutions inherit the security of the underlying blockchain
  • Transactions settled on the main chain benefit from its consensus mechanism and immutability
  • Off-chain transactions are secured by cryptographic techniques and economic incentives
• Trust assumptions vary depending on the specific Layer 2 implementation
  • State channels assume participants are online to monitor and challenge invalid state transitions
  • Plasma assumes users can detect and challenge fraudulent transactions on child chains within a specified period
• Potential vulnerabilities include key management risks and attacks by malicious actors
  • Participants must securely manage their private keys to prevent unauthorized access to funds
  • Malicious actors may attempt to broadcast outdated or invalid states to steal funds
• Mitigation techniques involve a combination of technical and economic measures
  1. Watchtowers to monitor channels and prevent fraud even if participants are offline
  2. Timelock mechanisms to allow for dispute resolution and prevent premature settlement
  3. Cryptographic techniques (fraud proofs, zero-knowledge proofs) to ensure the validity of off-chain transactions
  4. Economic incentives (collateral, penalties) to discourage malicious behavior and ensure honest participation