11.2 BCI-based stroke rehabilitation

Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) offer new hope for stroke rehabilitation. By harnessing neuroplasticity and motor imagery, BCIs help rewire the brain to regain lost motor functions. This technology provides real-time feedback, encouraging active participation and potentially improving outcomes for stroke survivors.

Compared to traditional therapies, BCI-based rehabilitation allows for more repetitions and personalized difficulty adjustments. While showing promise in improving motor function and daily living activities, BCIs face challenges like variability in individual responses. Combining BCIs with traditional methods may offer the best path forward.

Understanding BCI-based Stroke Rehabilitation

Motor impairments from stroke

Top images from around the web for Motor impairments from stroke

• 

  Frontiers | Motor Overflow and Spasticity in Chronic Stroke Share a Common Pathophysiological ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Electrical, Hemodynamic, and Motor Activity in BCI Post-stroke Rehabilitation ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Electrical, Hemodynamic, and Motor Activity in BCI Post-stroke Rehabilitation ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Motor Overflow and Spasticity in Chronic Stroke Share a Common Pathophysiological ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Electrical, Hemodynamic, and Motor Activity in BCI Post-stroke Rehabilitation ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Motor impairments from stroke

• 

  Frontiers | Motor Overflow and Spasticity in Chronic Stroke Share a Common Pathophysiological ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Electrical, Hemodynamic, and Motor Activity in BCI Post-stroke Rehabilitation ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Electrical, Hemodynamic, and Motor Activity in BCI Post-stroke Rehabilitation ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Motor Overflow and Spasticity in Chronic Stroke Share a Common Pathophysiological ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Electrical, Hemodynamic, and Motor Activity in BCI Post-stroke Rehabilitation ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Hemiparesis weakens one side of the body affecting arm, leg, and face muscles impairing daily activities (dressing, eating)
• Spasticity increases muscle tone and stiffness leading to difficulty in movement and positioning hindering mobility (walking, reaching)
• Impaired coordination causes ataxia affecting balance and fine motor skills impacting tasks (writing, buttoning clothes)
• Apraxia hinders performing learned movements impacting ability to carry out daily tasks (using utensils, brushing teeth)
• Reduced independence in activities of daily living decreases mobility and increases fall risk
• Challenges in communication and social interaction lead to potential isolation
• Potential loss of employment and financial strain impact overall quality of life

Principles of BCI for rehabilitation

• Neuroplasticity-based approach leverages brain's ability to reorganize and form new neural connections recruiting undamaged areas for motor control
• Motor imagery paradigm utilizes mental rehearsal of movements activating similar brain regions as actual movement (imagining hand opening/closing)
• Closed-loop feedback system provides real-time sensory feedback reinforcing neural pathways through visual, auditory, or tactile cues
• EEG-based signal acquisition non-invasively records brain activity focusing on sensorimotor rhythm modulation
• Feature extraction and classification identify relevant EEG patterns associated with motor imagery using machine learning algorithms for accurate decoding
• Neurofeedback integration presents decoded brain signals to the user encouraging active participation and engagement in therapy

Evaluating and Comparing BCI-based Stroke Rehabilitation

Efficacy of BCI interventions

• Motor function improvement increases Fugl-Meyer Assessment scores and enhances grip strength and range of motion
• Neurophysiological changes show increased activation in ipsilesional motor cortex and enhanced interhemispheric connectivity
• Functional gains improve performance in activities of daily living increasing independence and quality of life (dressing, cooking)
• Long-term outcomes demonstrate sustained improvements beyond the intervention period with potential for continued home-based therapy
• Limitations include variability in individual responses to BCI therapy and need for larger, randomized controlled trials

BCI vs traditional stroke therapy

• BCI allows for higher number of repetitions while traditional therapy limited by physical fatigue
• BCI promotes active participation through neurofeedback whereas traditional therapy may have passive components
• BCI adjusts difficulty based on real-time performance while traditional therapy relies on therapist assessment
• BCI needs specialized equipment and technical expertise traditional therapy requires trained therapists and physical space
• BCI shows potential for home-based and telerehabilitation traditional therapy often clinic-based
• Combination approach integrates BCI with traditional therapies for synergistic effects enhancing outcomes through multimodal rehabilitation