14.3 Ethics of human enhancement and transhumanism
3 min read•july 18, 2024
Human enhancement and are pushing the boundaries of what it means to be human. Using biotechnology, we can now boost our physical and mental abilities beyond normal limits. This raises exciting possibilities but also ethical concerns.
The debate around enhancement technologies is complex. Proponents argue they could improve human well-being and solve global problems. Critics worry about unintended consequences and widening social inequalities. As these technologies advance, society must grapple with the implications.
Understanding Human Enhancement and Transhumanism
Human enhancement and transhumanism
Top images from around the web for Human enhancement and transhumanism
Frontiers | The Challenge of CRISPR-Cas Toward Bioethics View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Human enhancement involves using technology, medicine, or other means to improve human physical, cognitive, or psychological capacities beyond the normal range
Boosting intelligence, strength, or lifespan through drugs (nootropics), (CRISPR), or cybernetic implants (brain-computer interfaces)
Transhumanism advocates for transforming the human condition through advanced technologies to eliminate aging, enhance human capabilities, and achieve a "posthuman" state
Biotechnology enables human enhancement and transhumanist goals by providing tools for modifying and enhancing human biology
Advances in genetic engineering (gene therapy), regenerative medicine (stem cells), and (neural implants) facilitate human enhancement
Arguments for vs against enhancements
Arguments in favor of human enhancement:
Enhancing human capacities could increase productivity, creativity, and overall well-being
Cognitive enhancements could improve decision-making and complex problem-solving
Physical enhancements could reduce suffering from illness or disability and extend healthy lifespans
Genetic enhancements could prevent or cure genetic diseases (Huntington's disease) and disorders (Down syndrome)
Arguments against human enhancement:
Enhancements could exacerbate existing social inequalities if only accessible to the wealthy
Cognitive enhancements raise concerns about authenticity, identity, and the value of human achievement
Physical enhancements could create pressure to conform to new standards of beauty or performance
Genetic enhancements pose risks of unintended consequences and could alter fundamental aspects of human nature
Implications of enhancement technologies
Social implications:
Enhancements could create an "enhanced" class, widening the gap between enhanced and unenhanced individuals
Widespread use of enhancements could alter social norms and expectations around human abilities and behavior
Economic implications:
Developing and distributing enhancement technologies could create new industries and economic opportunities
Access to enhancements could become a key factor in individual and national economic competitiveness
Political implications:
Governments may need to regulate the development, distribution, and use of enhancement technologies
Enhancement technologies could be used for military or intelligence purposes, raising concerns about an "enhancement arms race"
Ethics of enhancement decisions
:
Individuals undergoing enhancement procedures must be fully informed of potential risks, benefits, and long-term consequences
Special considerations may be needed for enhancing children or individuals with diminished decision-making capacity
Autonomy:
The decision to undergo enhancement should be a matter of personal choice, free from coercion
Society must balance respect for individual autonomy with considerations of public health and safety
Justice:
Equitable access to enhancement technologies is essential to prevent unjust disparities
Policies may be needed to ensure enhancements do not unfairly advantage some individuals over others in education, employment, or other domains