5.3 Competitive Dynamics and Game Theory

Game theory provides a framework for understanding strategic interactions between firms. It helps predict competitive behavior by analyzing players, strategies, and payoffs. Key concepts include Nash equilibrium, where no player has an incentive to change their strategy unilaterally.

In firm competition, game theory illuminates various scenarios like Prisoner's Dilemma, Bertrand, Cournot, and Stackelberg competition. These models explore how firms make decisions on pricing, quantity, and market entry, considering factors like first-mover advantage, retaliation, signaling, and strategic commitments.

Game Theory and Competitive Dynamics

Principles of game theory

Top images from around the web for Principles of game theory

• 

  Nash equilibrium - Simulace.info View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Shape of Rational Choices in Game Theory - Dr Tarun Sabarwal, University of Kansas • scipod ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Nash equilibrium - Simulace.info View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Nash equilibrium - Simulace.info View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Shape of Rational Choices in Game Theory - Dr Tarun Sabarwal, University of Kansas • scipod ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Principles of game theory

• 

  Nash equilibrium - Simulace.info View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Shape of Rational Choices in Game Theory - Dr Tarun Sabarwal, University of Kansas • scipod ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Nash equilibrium - Simulace.info View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Nash equilibrium - Simulace.info View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Shape of Rational Choices in Game Theory - Dr Tarun Sabarwal, University of Kansas • scipod ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Mathematical framework analyzes strategic interactions between rational decision-makers
• Assumes players are rational and aim to maximize their payoffs (profits, market share)
• Helps predict and understand competitive behavior in various settings (oligopolies, auctions)
• Key concepts include:
  • Players: Firms or individuals involved in the game (Coca-Cola and Pepsi)
  • Strategies: Actions available to each player (pricing, advertising)
  • Payoffs: Outcomes resulting from the combination of strategies chosen by all players (profits, market share)
  • Nash equilibrium: A set of strategies where no player has an incentive to deviate unilaterally (both firms charging the same price)

Game theory in firm competition

• Prisoner's Dilemma illustrates tension between individual and collective interests
  • Firms may choose suboptimal strategies due to lack of trust or fear of being exploited (price wars)
• Bertrand competition involves price competition between firms selling homogeneous products
  • Equilibrium outcome: Firms set prices equal to marginal cost, leading to zero profits
• Cournot competition involves quantity competition between firms selling homogeneous products
  • Equilibrium outcome: Firms produce quantities that maximize their individual profits, leading to higher prices and lower output compared to perfect competition
• Stackelberg competition is a sequential game where one firm (leader) moves first, and the other (follower) responds
  • Leader enjoys a first-mover advantage and can secure higher profits than in simultaneous-move games (Amazon entering a new market)

First-mover advantage vs retaliation

• First-mover advantage benefits being first to enter a market or introduce a new product/technology
  • Advantages: Brand loyalty, economies of scale, network effects, setting industry standards (iPhone)
  • Risks: High initial investments, uncertainty, potential for imitation by competitors
• Competitive retaliation involves incumbent firms' reactions to new entrants or competitive moves by rivals
  • Forms of retaliation: Price wars, increased advertising, legal action, product imitation (Uber vs Lyft)
  • Factors influencing retaliation: Market concentration, entry barriers, strategic importance of the market
• Implications:
  • First-movers must weigh benefits and risks of pioneering and be prepared for competitive responses
  • Retaliating firms should consider long-term impact on industry profitability and their own resources

Signaling and commitment in competition

• Signaling conveys information about a firm's intentions, capabilities, or market conditions to competitors
  • Types of signals: Price changes, capacity investments, public announcements, strategic moves (Tesla announcing new factory)
  • Credibility of signals depends on the cost and observability of the action
• Commitment involves irreversible actions that bind a firm to a particular strategy or course of action
  • Examples: Long-term contracts, strategic investments, public statements by executives (Walmart's everyday low prices)
  • Commitments can deter entry, influence rivals' behavior, and shape market expectations
• Strategic use of signaling and commitment:
  1. Deter entry or competitive moves by signaling strength or resolve
  2. Coordinate actions and avoid destructive competition by establishing focal points
  3. Influence rivals' expectations and behavior by making credible commitments