Change of variables in multiple integrals is a powerful technique for solving complex problems in physics and engineering. It allows us to transform integrals from one coordinate system to another, simplifying calculations and exploiting symmetries in the process.
This section focuses on practical applications of change of variables. We'll explore how it's used to calculate mass, moments of inertia, and surface areas in various coordinate systems. We'll also dive into its role in probability theory and statistics.
Coordinate Systems
Polar and Spherical Coordinate Systems
Top images from around the web for Polar and Spherical Coordinate Systems Quadric Surfaces · Calculus View original
Is this image relevant?
HartleyMath - Triple Integrals in Spherical Coordinates View original
Is this image relevant?
Triple Integrals in Cylindrical and Spherical Coordinates · Calculus View original
Is this image relevant?
Quadric Surfaces · Calculus View original
Is this image relevant?
HartleyMath - Triple Integrals in Spherical Coordinates View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Polar and Spherical Coordinate Systems Quadric Surfaces · Calculus View original
Is this image relevant?
HartleyMath - Triple Integrals in Spherical Coordinates View original
Is this image relevant?
Triple Integrals in Cylindrical and Spherical Coordinates · Calculus View original
Is this image relevant?
Quadric Surfaces · Calculus View original
Is this image relevant?
HartleyMath - Triple Integrals in Spherical Coordinates View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Polar coordinates ( r , θ ) (r, \theta) ( r , θ ) represent points in a 2D plane using a distance r r r from the origin and an angle θ \theta θ from the positive x-axis
Useful for problems with circular symmetry (circular motion, gravitational fields)
Spherical coordinates ( r , θ , ϕ ) (r, \theta, \phi) ( r , θ , ϕ ) extend polar coordinates to 3D space by adding an azimuthal angle ϕ \phi ϕ measured from the positive z-axis
Advantageous for problems with spherical symmetry (electric fields, angular momentum)
Conversion formulas relate polar and spherical coordinates to Cartesian coordinates ( x , y , z ) (x, y, z) ( x , y , z )
Polar: x = r cos θ x = r\cos\theta x = r cos θ , y = r sin θ y = r\sin\theta y = r sin θ
Spherical: x = r sin ϕ cos θ x = r\sin\phi\cos\theta x = r sin ϕ cos θ , y = r sin ϕ sin θ y = r\sin\phi\sin\theta y = r sin ϕ sin θ , z = r cos ϕ z = r\cos\phi z = r cos ϕ
Cylindrical and Elliptical Coordinate Systems
Cylindrical coordinates ( r , θ , z ) (r, \theta, z) ( r , θ , z ) combine polar coordinates in the xy-plane with a Cartesian z-coordinate
Suitable for problems with cylindrical symmetry (fluid flow through pipes, electromagnetic waves in waveguides)
Elliptical coordinates ( ξ , η , ϕ ) (\xi, \eta, \phi) ( ξ , η , ϕ ) are based on confocal ellipsoids and hyperboloids
Useful in solving partial differential equations (Laplace's equation, wave equation) in ellipsoidal domains
Coordinate system choice depends on the geometry and symmetry of the problem
Simplifies expressions and calculations by aligning with natural boundaries and exploiting symmetries
Physical Applications
Mass and Moment of Inertia Calculations
Change of variables enables calculation of mass and center of mass for objects with complex geometries
Mass element d m = ρ ( x , y , z ) d V dm = \rho(x, y, z) \, dV d m = ρ ( x , y , z ) d V in Cartesian coordinates transforms to d m = ρ ( r , θ , ϕ ) r 2 sin ϕ d r d θ d ϕ dm = \rho(r, \theta, \phi) \, r^2\sin\phi \, dr \, d\theta \, d\phi d m = ρ ( r , θ , ϕ ) r 2 sin ϕ d r d θ d ϕ in spherical coordinates
Moment of inertia tensor I I I quantifies an object's resistance to rotational acceleration
Diagonal elements I x x , I y y , I z z I_{xx}, I_{yy}, I_{zz} I xx , I yy , I zz represent moments of inertia about principal axes
Off-diagonal elements I x y , I x z , I y z I_{xy}, I_{xz}, I_{yz} I x y , I x z , I yz are products of inertia
Appropriate coordinate system choice simplifies integration and exploits symmetry
Spherical coordinates for spherical objects (planets, stars)
Cylindrical coordinates for cylindrical objects (shafts, flywheels)
Surface Area Calculations
Surface area of parametric surfaces r ( u , v ) = ( x ( u , v ) , y ( u , v ) , z ( u , v ) ) \mathbf{r}(u, v) = (x(u, v), y(u, v), z(u, v)) r ( u , v ) = ( x ( u , v ) , y ( u , v ) , z ( u , v )) given by double integral A = ∬ ∥ ∂ r ∂ u × ∂ r ∂ v ∥ d u d v A = \iint \left\lVert \frac{\partial \mathbf{r}}{\partial u} \times \frac{\partial \mathbf{r}}{\partial v} \right\rVert \, du \, dv A = ∬ ∂ u ∂ r × ∂ v ∂ r d u d v
Cross product of partial derivatives yields surface element d S dS d S
Coordinate transformations map surface integrals to parameter space ( u , v ) (u, v) ( u , v )
Sphere of radius R R R : r ( θ , ϕ ) = ( R sin ϕ cos θ , R sin ϕ sin θ , R cos ϕ ) \mathbf{r}(\theta, \phi) = (R\sin\phi\cos\theta, R\sin\phi\sin\theta, R\cos\phi) r ( θ , ϕ ) = ( R sin ϕ cos θ , R sin ϕ sin θ , R cos ϕ ) , A = ∫ 0 2 π ∫ 0 π R 2 sin ϕ d ϕ d θ = 4 π R 2 A = \int_0^{2\pi} \int_0^\pi R^2\sin\phi \, d\phi \, d\theta = 4\pi R^2 A = ∫ 0 2 π ∫ 0 π R 2 sin ϕ d ϕ d θ = 4 π R 2
Gauss-Ostrogradsky theorem relates surface integrals to volume integrals
Flux of vector field F \mathbf{F} F through closed surface S S S equals volume integral of divergence ∇ ⋅ F \nabla \cdot \mathbf{F} ∇ ⋅ F over enclosed volume V V V
Probability Distributions
Probability Density Functions and Random Variables
Probability density functions (PDFs) f ( x 1 , … , x n ) f(x_1, \ldots, x_n) f ( x 1 , … , x n ) describe continuous multivariate probability distributions
Joint PDF of random variables X 1 , … , X n X_1, \ldots, X_n X 1 , … , X n gives probability P ( ( X 1 , … , X n ) ∈ A ) = ∫ A f ( x 1 , … , x n ) d x 1 … d x n P((X_1, \ldots, X_n) \in A) = \int_A f(x_1, \ldots, x_n) \, dx_1 \ldots dx_n P (( X 1 , … , X n ) ∈ A ) = ∫ A f ( x 1 , … , x n ) d x 1 … d x n for any measurable set A A A
Change of variables theorem relates PDFs under coordinate transformations
If Y = g ( X ) \mathbf{Y} = \mathbf{g}(\mathbf{X}) Y = g ( X ) is a one-to-one transformation with inverse X = h ( Y ) \mathbf{X} = \mathbf{h}(\mathbf{Y}) X = h ( Y ) , then f Y ( y ) = f X ( h ( y ) ) ∣ det J h ( y ) ∣ f_\mathbf{Y}(\mathbf{y}) = f_\mathbf{X}(\mathbf{h}(\mathbf{y})) \, |\det J_\mathbf{h}(\mathbf{y})| f Y ( y ) = f X ( h ( y )) ∣ det J h ( y ) ∣
Marginal and conditional PDFs obtained by integration and division
Marginal PDF f X i ( x i ) = ∫ f ( x 1 , … , x n ) d x 1 … d x i − 1 d x i + 1 … d x n f_{X_i}(x_i) = \int f(x_1, \ldots, x_n) \, dx_1 \ldots dx_{i-1} dx_{i+1} \ldots dx_n f X i ( x i ) = ∫ f ( x 1 , … , x n ) d x 1 … d x i − 1 d x i + 1 … d x n
Conditional PDF f X i ∣ X j ( x i ∣ x j ) = f ( x i , x j ) f X j ( x j ) f_{X_i|X_j}(x_i|x_j) = \frac{f(x_i, x_j)}{f_{X_j}(x_j)} f X i ∣ X j ( x i ∣ x j ) = f X j ( x j ) f ( x i , x j )
Applications in Statistics and Machine Learning
Multivariate normal distribution widely used for modeling correlated random variables
PDF f ( x ) = 1 ( 2 π ) n det Σ exp ( − 1 2 ( x − μ ) ⊤ Σ − 1 ( x − μ ) ) f(\mathbf{x}) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{(2\pi)^n \det \Sigma}} \exp\left(-\frac{1}{2}(\mathbf{x} - \mathbf{\mu})^\top \Sigma^{-1} (\mathbf{x} - \mathbf{\mu})\right) f ( x ) = ( 2 π ) n d e t Σ 1 exp ( − 2 1 ( x − μ ) ⊤ Σ − 1 ( x − μ ) ) with mean vector μ \mathbf{\mu} μ and covariance matrix Σ \Sigma Σ
Bayesian inference updates prior distributions to posterior distributions based on observed data
Posterior PDF f ( θ ∣ x ) ∝ f ( x ∣ θ ) f ( θ ) f(\mathbf{\theta}|\mathbf{x}) \propto f(\mathbf{x}|\mathbf{\theta}) \, f(\mathbf{\theta}) f ( θ ∣ x ) ∝ f ( x ∣ θ ) f ( θ ) by Bayes' theorem, where f ( x ∣ θ ) f(\mathbf{x}|\mathbf{\theta}) f ( x ∣ θ ) is likelihood and f ( θ ) f(\mathbf{\theta}) f ( θ ) is prior
Coordinate transformations enable efficient sampling and integration in high-dimensional spaces
Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods (Metropolis-Hastings, Gibbs sampling) generate samples from complex distributions
Variational inference approximates intractable posteriors with simpler distributions by minimizing Kullback-Leibler divergence