11.4 Participatory economics

Participatory economics, or parecon, is an alternative economic system that aims to achieve equity, solidarity, and self-management. It replaces corporate hierarchies with balanced job complexes and market allocation with participatory planning, striving for a more democratic and egalitarian economy.

Parecon's core principles include social ownership of productive assets, remuneration based on effort, and a classless division of labor. While critics question its feasibility and efficiency, proponents argue it could lead to greater economic democracy, sustainability, and human fulfillment compared to capitalism or centrally planned socialism.

Key principles of participatory economics

• Participatory economics (parecon) is an economic system proposed as an alternative to capitalism and centrally planned socialism
• Aims to achieve equity, solidarity, diversity, and participatory self-management in economic life
• Core values include economic justice, transparency, environmental sustainability, and human fulfillment

Balanced job complexes vs corporate hierarchy

• In parecon, balanced job complexes ensure every worker has a mix of empowering and rote tasks
  • Avoids the class division between empowered coordinators and disempowered workers
• Contrasts with typical corporate hierarchies under capitalism
  • Managers, executives and owners hold power and empowering roles
  • Front-line workers perform more repetitive, disempowering tasks
• Balanced job complexes allow for greater workplace democracy and egalitarianism

Remuneration based on effort and sacrifice

• In participatory economics, workers are compensated based on their effort and sacrifice rather than output or property ownership
• Effort includes the time, intensity, and onerousness of socially valued labor
  • More difficult or dangerous work would be rewarded more
• Sacrifice considers personal foregoing of leisure or consumption
• Intended to reward hard work while avoiding wide inequalities and class divisions
• Differs from remuneration in capitalism based on market value of outputs, bargaining power, or capital ownership

Participatory planning vs market allocation

Iterative process of proposal and feedback

Top images from around the web for Iterative process of proposal and feedback

• 

  Life cycle - Praxis Framework View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Iterative and incremental development - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  File:Venn diagram of Participatory Action Research.jpg - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Life cycle - Praxis Framework View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Iterative and incremental development - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Iterative process of proposal and feedback

• 

  Life cycle - Praxis Framework View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Iterative and incremental development - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  File:Venn diagram of Participatory Action Research.jpg - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Life cycle - Praxis Framework View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Iterative and incremental development - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Parecon replaces market forces with participatory planning to allocate resources and guide production
• Involves an iterative process where worker and consumer councils propose production and consumption plans
• Plans are evaluated, revised and reconciled through successive rounds of feedback
  • Prices are adjusted to clear excess supply or demand
• Intended to be a democratic and transparent alternative to the "anarchy of the market"

Decentralized worker and consumer councils

• Planning is carried out through a federated network of worker and consumer councils
• Worker councils manage the production side, proposing workplace activities
• Consumer councils propose consumption requests on behalf of households and communities
• Facilitates decentralized economic decision-making and self-management
• Contrasts with top-down planning by a central authority or impersonal market forces

Social ownership of productive assets

• Parecon socializes productive property, meaning assets are owned by society as a whole
• Workers and consumers control the use of productive assets through their councils
• Avoids private ownership of the means of production and a separate capitalist class
• Social ownership paired with participatory planning allows production to be directed toward meeting human needs

Classless division of labor

Empowerment of all workers

• The balanced job complex aims to empower all workers and overcome class divisions in economic power
• All workers participate in a mix of creative directing and rote directed tasks
  • Avoids the coordinator class monopolizing empowering work
• Allows every worker to develop skills and decision-making capacity
• Facilitates self-management and a classless workplace

Diversity and self-management

• Parecon values a diversity of production forms, lifestyles and cultural practices
  • Accommodates worker cooperatives, freelancers, nomadic projects, and more
• Emphasis on participatory self-management rather than imposing a uniform economic model
• Councils at different levels allow individuals and groups to democratically manage their own economic lives
• Workplaces internally self-managed by the workers rather than bosses or bureaucrats

Criticisms of participatory economics

Concerns about incentives and efficiency

• Some economists question whether parecon provides sufficient incentives for innovation and productivity
  • Without market competition or material inequality, would people work hard?
• Participatory planning process could be time-consuming and cumbersome compared to markets
  • Could lead to inefficiencies and sluggish responsiveness to economic changes
• Difficulty quantifying and balancing effort and sacrifice could lead to conflicts

Questions of feasibility and implementation

• Given the complexity of modern economies, some doubt the feasibility of participatory planning
  • Could it work for millions of products, services, and inputs?
• Implementing parecon would require a major transformation of existing institutions and power structures
  • How to overcome entrenched opposition from elites who benefit from current system?
• Risk of black markets or counter-revolutionary forces emerging during transition period

Comparison to other economic systems

Participatory economics vs capitalism

• Parecon rejects private ownership of productive property, market allocation, and hierarchical corporate structures central to capitalism
• Capitalist profit motive replaced by participatory planning aimed at satisfying human needs and desires
• Parecon's balanced job complexes and reward for effort challenge capitalism's class inequality and exploitation
• Emphasis on environmental sustainability contrasts with the growth imperative and externalization of ecological costs under capitalism

Participatory economics vs socialism

• Parecon shares socialism's goal of social ownership and workers' control of production
• However, parecon rejects central planning by a state authority, favoring decentralized participatory planning
• Balanced job complexes challenge the persistence of a coordinator class in some socialist models
• Greater emphasis on diversity and self-management rather than a unitary economic model

Potential benefits of participatory economics

Economic democracy and equality

• Participatory planning and balanced job complexes allow all workers a say in economic decisions
• Empowers workers and consumers to democratically manage production and allocate resources
• Classless division of labor and reward for effort could significantly reduce economic inequality
  • Avoids grossly unequal incomes, wealth, and economic power
• Facilitates a more equal and cooperative rather than competitive culture

Environmental sustainability

• Participatory economics counts environmental and ecological factors in its planning and cost/benefit assessments
• Considers long-term sustainability and impact on nature and communities
• Production for human needs and well-being rather than just profit and growth
  • Less pressure for environmentally destructive over-production or planned obsolescence
• More ability for communities to protect local ecosystems and resources

Fulfillment of human needs and potentials

• Parecon orients the economy toward providing for human needs and enabling human flourishing
• Classless work roles allow more people to reach their productive and creative potentials
• Job balancing can reduce alienation and make work more fulfilling
• Planning process lets people define and pursue their individual and collective economic goals
• Economic democracy, equity and solidarity could improve quality of life and social relations