3.4 Competition and monopoly

Competition and monopoly shape market dynamics, influencing prices, output, and efficiency. Perfect competition serves as an ideal benchmark, while monopolies wield significant market power. Understanding these structures helps analyze real-world markets and their impacts on consumers and producers.

Oligopolies and monopolistic competition blend elements of competition and monopoly. Price discrimination and regulation strategies aim to address market inefficiencies. Antitrust policies promote competition, prevent monopolization, and protect consumer welfare in various market structures.

Perfect competition

• Perfect competition is a market structure characterized by a large number of small firms, homogeneous products, and free entry and exit
• In a perfectly competitive market, firms are price takers and have no market power, meaning they cannot influence the market price
• Perfect competition serves as a benchmark for evaluating the efficiency and welfare implications of other market structures

Characteristics of perfect competition

Top images from around the web for Characteristics of perfect competition

• 

  Perfect Competition – Introduction to Microeconomics View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Perfect Competition – Introduction to Microeconomics View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Why It Matters: Perfect Competition | Microeconomics View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Perfect Competition – Introduction to Microeconomics View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Perfect Competition – Introduction to Microeconomics View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Characteristics of perfect competition

• 

  Perfect Competition – Introduction to Microeconomics View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Perfect Competition – Introduction to Microeconomics View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Why It Matters: Perfect Competition | Microeconomics View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Perfect Competition – Introduction to Microeconomics View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Perfect Competition – Introduction to Microeconomics View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Large number of buyers and sellers, each having a small market share
• Homogeneous products, meaning the goods or services offered by different firms are identical and perfectly substitutable
• Perfect information, with all market participants having complete knowledge about prices, product quality, and production techniques
• Free entry and exit, allowing firms to enter or leave the market without any barriers or costs
• No externalities or public goods, ensuring that the market price reflects all relevant costs and benefits

Profit maximization in perfect competition

• In the short run, a perfectly competitive firm maximizes profits by producing the quantity where marginal revenue equals marginal cost (MR = MC)
• The firm's marginal revenue is equal to the market price (MR = P) because it is a price taker and cannot influence the price
• If the market price is above the firm's average total cost (P > ATC), the firm earns positive economic profits
• If the market price is equal to the firm's average total cost (P = ATC), the firm earns zero economic profits (break-even point)
• If the market price is below the firm's average total cost (P < ATC), the firm incurs economic losses

Short-run vs long-run equilibrium

• In the short run, a perfectly competitive firm can earn positive, zero, or negative economic profits depending on the market price and its cost structure
• In the long run, the free entry and exit of firms drive economic profits to zero (P = ATC)
  • If firms are earning positive economic profits, new firms will enter the market, increasing supply and driving down the market price until profits are eliminated
  • If firms are incurring economic losses, some firms will exit the market, reducing supply and raising the market price until losses are eliminated
• In the long-run equilibrium, all firms in the market earn zero economic profits, and the market price equals the minimum of the average total cost curve (P = min ATC)

Monopoly

• A monopoly is a market structure characterized by a single seller of a unique product with no close substitutes
• Monopolies have significant market power, allowing them to influence the market price and output
• Compared to perfect competition, monopolies typically result in higher prices, lower output, and reduced social welfare

Characteristics of monopoly

• Single seller, with the monopolist being the only firm in the market
• Unique product, meaning there are no close substitutes available for consumers
• High barriers to entry, such as legal restrictions (patents or licenses), economies of scale, or control over essential resources
• Price maker, allowing the monopolist to determine the market price by adjusting its output level
• Downward-sloping demand curve, indicating that the monopolist faces the entire market demand and must lower prices to sell more output

Sources of monopoly power

• Legal barriers, such as patents, copyrights, or government licenses, which grant exclusive rights to produce or sell a product
• Economies of scale, where the long-run average cost curve continues to decline as output increases, making it difficult for new firms to compete
• Control over essential resources, such as raw materials or distribution channels, which prevents potential competitors from entering the market
• Network externalities, where the value of a product increases as more people use it, creating a barrier for new entrants (e.g., social media platforms)

Profit maximization under monopoly

• A monopolist maximizes profits by producing the quantity where marginal revenue equals marginal cost (MR = MC)
• Unlike perfect competition, the monopolist's marginal revenue is less than the market price (MR < P) because it faces a downward-sloping demand curve
• The monopolist sets a price higher than marginal cost (P > MC), resulting in a markup and positive economic profits
• The monopolist's profit-maximizing quantity is lower than the socially optimal quantity, leading to a deadweight loss (allocative inefficiency)

Inefficiency of monopoly

• Monopolies create allocative inefficiency by producing less than the socially optimal quantity and charging a price above marginal cost
  • This results in a deadweight loss, representing the reduction in social welfare compared to a perfectly competitive market
• Monopolies may also create productive inefficiency by not minimizing costs or investing in innovation
  • Lack of competitive pressure can lead to X-inefficiency, where firms do not produce at the lowest possible cost
• Monopolies may engage in rent-seeking behavior, using resources to maintain or strengthen their market power (e.g., lobbying for favorable regulations)

Monopolistic competition

• Monopolistic competition is a market structure characterized by many firms selling differentiated products with free entry and exit
• Firms in monopolistic competition have some market power due to product differentiation but face competition from close substitutes
• Monopolistic competition combines elements of both perfect competition and monopoly

Characteristics of monopolistic competition

• Many firms, each with a small market share
• Differentiated products, meaning the goods or services offered by different firms are similar but not perfect substitutes
• Free entry and exit, allowing firms to enter or leave the market without significant barriers
• Some degree of market power, enabling firms to set prices above marginal cost
• Downward-sloping demand curve, indicating that firms face a relatively elastic demand for their products

Product differentiation

• Product differentiation refers to the process of distinguishing a product or service from competitors' offerings to make it more attractive to a specific target market
• Differentiation can be based on various factors, such as quality, design, brand image, location, or customer service
• Successful product differentiation allows firms to charge higher prices and earn positive economic profits in the short run
• Examples of product differentiation include different flavors of toothpaste, restaurant themes, or smartphone features

Profit maximization in monopolistic competition

• In the short run, a firm in monopolistic competition maximizes profits by setting marginal revenue equal to marginal cost (MR = MC)
• The firm's marginal revenue is less than the price (MR < P) due to the downward-sloping demand curve
• If the firm's price exceeds its average total cost (P > ATC), it earns positive economic profits
• If the firm's price equals its average total cost (P = ATC), it earns zero economic profits
• If the firm's price is below its average total cost (P < ATC), it incurs economic losses

Excess capacity and inefficiency

• In the long run, the free entry and exit of firms drive economic profits to zero (P = ATC)
  • If firms are earning positive economic profits, new firms will enter the market, reducing the demand for each firm's product and driving down prices
  • If firms are incurring economic losses, some firms will exit the market, increasing the demand for the remaining firms' products and raising prices
• In the long-run equilibrium, firms in monopolistic competition operate with excess capacity, producing less than the output level that minimizes average total cost
  • This is because the firm's demand curve is tangent to its average total cost curve at a point to the left of the minimum ATC
• The excess capacity represents an inefficient allocation of resources compared to perfect competition

Oligopoly

• An oligopoly is a market structure characterized by a few large firms that dominate the market and produce either homogeneous or differentiated products
• Firms in an oligopoly are interdependent, meaning their decisions and actions affect each other's profitability
• Oligopolies can lead to a wide range of market outcomes, from intense competition to collusion

Characteristics of oligopoly

• Few large firms, each with a significant market share
• High barriers to entry, such as economies of scale, high fixed costs, or legal restrictions
• Interdependence among firms, where each firm's actions affect the profitability of others
• Strategic behavior, with firms considering the potential reactions of their competitors when making decisions
• Products can be homogeneous (e.g., steel, cement) or differentiated (e.g., automobiles, smartphones)

Strategic behavior in oligopoly

• Firms in an oligopoly engage in strategic behavior, taking into account the potential reactions of their competitors when making decisions
• Strategic behavior can lead to various pricing and output strategies, such as price leadership, price wars, or non-price competition (e.g., advertising, product differentiation)
• The kinked demand curve model explains why prices in an oligopoly may be relatively stable
  • Firms believe that if they raise prices, competitors will not follow, leading to a significant loss of market share
  • Firms also believe that if they lower prices, competitors will match the price cut, resulting in little gain in market share but reduced profitability for all firms

Game theory and oligopoly

• Game theory is a mathematical framework for analyzing strategic interactions among decision-makers
• In the context of oligopoly, game theory helps explain how firms make decisions based on their expectations of competitors' actions
• The Prisoner's Dilemma is a classic example of game theory applied to oligopoly
  • Two firms must decide whether to compete or collude, with the payoffs depending on each other's choices
  • The dominant strategy for each firm is to compete, even though collusion would lead to higher profits for both firms
• Other game theory models used in oligopoly include the Cournot model (quantity competition) and the Bertrand model (price competition)

Collusion and cartels

• Collusion refers to an agreement among firms in an oligopoly to coordinate their pricing or output decisions to maximize joint profits
• Cartels are formal organizations of colluding firms that agree on prices, output levels, market shares, or other business practices
• Collusion and cartels are illegal in many countries due to their anti-competitive effects and potential to harm consumers
• Factors that facilitate collusion include a small number of firms, homogeneous products, similar cost structures, and high barriers to entry
• Challenges to sustaining collusion include the incentive for firms to cheat on the agreement (e.g., secretly cutting prices to gain market share) and the threat of legal action by antitrust authorities

Price discrimination

• Price discrimination is the practice of charging different prices to different consumers for the same product or service, based on their willingness to pay
• Firms engage in price discrimination to increase profits by capturing more consumer surplus
• For price discrimination to be successful, firms must have some market power, be able to identify different consumer groups, and prevent resale among them

First-degree price discrimination

• Also known as perfect price discrimination, first-degree price discrimination involves charging each consumer the maximum price they are willing to pay for each unit of the product
• Under first-degree price discrimination, the firm captures all the consumer surplus, converting it into producer surplus (profits)
• First-degree price discrimination is rare in practice due to the difficulty of identifying each consumer's willingness to pay and the potential for consumer backlash
• An example of first-degree price discrimination is an art auction, where each buyer pays their maximum willingness to pay for a unique item

Second-degree price discrimination

• Second-degree price discrimination involves offering different price-quantity combinations or product versions to consumers, allowing them to self-select based on their preferences
• Examples of second-degree price discrimination include quantity discounts, quality-based pricing, and versioning (e.g., software with basic and premium features)
• Block pricing is a form of second-degree price discrimination where prices vary based on the quantity purchased
  • Example: A mobile phone plan with a fixed monthly fee for a certain number of minutes and a higher per-minute rate for additional usage
• Two-part tariffs are another form of second-degree price discrimination, consisting of a fixed fee and a per-unit charge
  • Example: An amusement park charging an entrance fee plus a per-ride price

Third-degree price discrimination

• Third-degree price discrimination involves charging different prices to different consumer groups based on their price elasticity of demand
• The firm separates the market into distinct segments and sets a different price for each segment
• For third-degree price discrimination to be effective, the firm must be able to prevent resale between the different segments
• Examples of third-degree price discrimination include student discounts, senior citizen discounts, and geographical price differences
• The optimal prices for each segment are set such that the marginal revenue from each segment equals the marginal cost of production (MR1 = MR2 = ... = MRn = MC)

Profitability of price discrimination

• Price discrimination allows firms to increase profits by capturing more consumer surplus compared to a uniform pricing strategy
• The profitability of price discrimination depends on the difference in price elasticities among consumer segments and the firm's ability to segment the market effectively
• Price discrimination can also lead to increased output and improved capacity utilization, as the firm can serve more price-sensitive consumers at lower prices
• However, price discrimination may be limited by factors such as consumer perception of fairness, arbitrage (resale between segments), and legal restrictions

Regulation of monopoly

• Monopoly regulation refers to government intervention in markets with a single dominant firm to promote efficiency, protect consumers, and prevent abuse of market power
• Regulators may control prices, output levels, or quality standards to mitigate the inefficiencies and welfare losses associated with unregulated monopolies
• The main challenge in monopoly regulation is balancing the goals of efficiency, equity, and innovation while minimizing unintended consequences

Natural monopoly and regulation

• A natural monopoly is a market where a single firm can produce the entire output more efficiently than multiple firms due to significant economies of scale
• Examples of natural monopolies include utilities (e.g., electricity, water) and transportation networks (e.g., railways)
• In the case of natural monopolies, regulation is often justified to prevent excessive pricing and ensure adequate supply
• Regulators may set prices based on the firm's average costs, allowing a fair rate of return on invested capital

Marginal cost pricing

• Marginal cost pricing is a regulatory approach that sets prices equal to the marginal cost of production, mimicking the outcome of perfect competition
• Under marginal cost pricing, the regulated monopoly produces the socially optimal output level, eliminating the deadweight loss associated with monopoly pricing
• However, marginal cost pricing may lead to financial losses for the monopoly if its average costs exceed the marginal cost at the socially optimal output level
• To address this issue, regulators may use two-part tariffs or subsidies to ensure the monopoly's financial viability while maintaining efficient pricing

Rate-of-return regulation

• Rate-of-return regulation is a method of setting prices that allows the regulated monopoly to earn a fair return on its invested capital
• Regulators determine the allowed rate of return based on the firm's cost of capital and the risks associated with its operations
• The regulated price is set such that the firm's total revenue covers its operating costs and provides the allowed rate of return on its capital investments
• Critics argue that rate-of-return regulation may encourage overinvestment in capital (the Averch-Johnson effect) and provide little incentive for cost minimization

Deregulation and its effects

• Deregulation refers to the removal or reduction of government regulations in a market, allowing for greater competition and market-driven outcomes
• Proponents of deregulation argue that it can lead to lower prices, improved quality, and increased innovation by encouraging competition and reducing regulatory burdens
• However, deregulation may also have unintended consequences, such as the erosion of universal service, the emergence of market power, or the compromising of safety and reliability standards
• Examples of deregulation include the airline industry (1978), telecommunications (1996), and electricity markets in some regions
• The effects of deregulation depend on the specific market characteristics, the scope and design of the deregulatory measures, and the presence of effective competition and consumer protection policies

Antitrust policy

• Antitrust policy refers to the laws and regulations designed to promote competition, prevent monopolization, and protect consumers from anti-competitive business practices
• The main goals of antitrust policy are to maintain competitive markets, encourage economic efficiency, and maximize consumer welfare
• Antitrust authorities, such as the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in the United States, are responsible for enforcing antitrust laws

Goals of antitrust policy

• Promoting competition by preventing the formation or abuse of market power
• Encouraging economic efficiency, including allocative, productive, and dynamic efficiency
• Protecting consumer welfare by ensuring lower prices, higher quality, and greater choice
• Maintaining a level playing field for businesses, preventing unfair or exclusionary practices
• Preserving the competitive process, rather than protecting individual competitors

Sherman Act and Clayton Act

• The Sherman Act (1890) is the primary U.S. antitrust law, prohibiting agreements in restraint of trade (Section 1) and monopolization or attempts to monopolize (Section 2)
  • Examples of Section 1 violations include price-fixing, bid-rigging, and market allocation among competitors
  • Examples of Section 2 violations include predatory pricing, exclusive dealing, and refusal to deal with competitors
• The Clayton Act (1914) supplements the Sherman Act by addressing specific practices that may substantially lessen competition
  • The Clayton Act prohibits anti-competitive mergers and acquisitions, price discrimination (Robinson-Patman Act), exclusive dealing, and tying arrangements
• Both the Sherman Act and the Clayton Act provide for civil and criminal penalties, as well as private rights of action for damages

Merger guidelines

• Merger guidelines are issued by antitrust authorities to provide clarity and transparency regarding the evaluation of proposed mergers and acquisitions
• The guidelines outline the analytical framework, market definition criteria, and thresholds used to assess the competitive effects of mergers
• Horizontal merger guidelines focus on mergers between direct competitors, evaluating factors such as market concentration, unilateral effects, and coordinated effects
• Vertical merger guidelines address mergers between firms at different levels of the supply chain, assessing the potential for foreclosure