10.4 Chaucer's adaptation of Boccaccio's Il Filostrato

Chaucer's "Troilus and Criseyde" transforms Boccaccio's "Il Filostrato" into a richer, more complex tale. By expanding the narrative and deepening character development, Chaucer creates a work that resonates with his 14th-century English audience.

The adaptation reflects medieval English society, emphasizing courtly love, chivalry, and Christian values. Chaucer's changes highlight his interest in human psychology, philosophy, and the complexities of love and fate, making the story more relatable and thought-provoking.

Chaucer's Adaptation of Boccaccio's Il Filostrato

Chaucer's Troilus vs Boccaccio's Filostrato

Top images from around the web for Chaucer's Troilus vs Boccaccio's Filostrato

• 

  Troilus and Cressida | Victorian Illustrated Shakespeare Archive View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Troilus and Cressida | Victorian Illustrated Shakespeare Archive View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Troilus and Cressida Act V Header | Victorian Illustrated Shakespeare Archive View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Troilus and Cressida | Victorian Illustrated Shakespeare Archive View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Troilus and Cressida | Victorian Illustrated Shakespeare Archive View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Chaucer's Troilus vs Boccaccio's Filostrato

• 

  Troilus and Cressida | Victorian Illustrated Shakespeare Archive View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Troilus and Cressida | Victorian Illustrated Shakespeare Archive View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Troilus and Cressida Act V Header | Victorian Illustrated Shakespeare Archive View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Troilus and Cressida | Victorian Illustrated Shakespeare Archive View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Troilus and Cressida | Victorian Illustrated Shakespeare Archive View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Similarities between Troilus and Criseyde and Il Filostrato
  • Both works set against the backdrop of the Trojan War providing a rich historical and mythological context for the love story
  • Central plot revolves around the tragic love story of Troilus and Criseyde (Criseida in Il Filostrato) highlighting themes of love, loyalty, and betrayal
  • Key events, such as the lovers' first meeting facilitated by Pandarus and Criseyde's eventual betrayal when she chooses Diomede, present in both works serving as crucial turning points in the narrative
• Differences in length and structure
  • Chaucer's version significantly longer, consisting of five books and 8,239 lines allowing for greater character development and philosophical exploration
  • Boccaccio's Il Filostrato shorter, with nine parts and 5,704 lines resulting in a more concise and focused narrative
  • Chaucer adds a prologue and an epilogue, absent in Boccaccio's work, which frame the story and provide additional context and commentary
• Differences in narrative style and tone
  • Chaucer employs a more complex narrative structure, with multiple narrators (such as the narrator and Pandarus) and a greater emphasis on psychological depth delving into characters' motivations and inner conflicts
  • Boccaccio's narrative more straightforward and less introspective focusing primarily on the events of the love story itself
  • Chaucer's tone more ironic and philosophical, often questioning the nature of love and fate, while Boccaccio's tone more romantic and sentimental emphasizing the emotional intensity of the lovers' relationship

Cultural context in Chaucer's adaptation

• Emphasis on courtly love and chivalry
  • Chaucer expands on themes of courtly love, highlighting ideals and conventions of chivalric romance such as the noble knight's devotion to his lady and the importance of honor and loyalty
  • Characters' actions and motivations more closely aligned with expectations of 14th-century English aristocracy reflecting the social norms and values of Chaucer's audience
• Increased psychological depth and complexity
  • Chaucer devotes more attention to characters' inner thoughts, conflicts, and motivations such as Criseyde's internal struggle between love for Troilus and fear for her own safety
  • Added complexity reflects Chaucer's interest in exploring the human psyche and the nature of love as a powerful and often irrational force
• Incorporation of philosophical and religious themes
  • Chaucer introduces philosophical discussions on free will, determinism, and the role of fortune in shaping human lives encouraging readers to consider deeper questions about the nature of existence
  • Religious elements, such as invocation of gods and characters' prayers, more prominent in Chaucer's version reflecting the pervasive influence of Christianity in medieval English society
  • These changes reflect intellectual and religious climate of 14th-century England characterized by a growing interest in classical philosophy and a strong Christian worldview
• Influence of English social and political context
  • Chaucer's depiction of Trojan War and characters' actions may have been influenced by contemporary political situation, such as the Hundred Years' War between England and France, drawing parallels between ancient conflicts and current events
  • Expanded roles of certain characters, such as Pandarus who takes on a more central role as a facilitator and confidant, could be seen as a commentary on social dynamics of Chaucer's time including the importance of personal connections and the complexities of friendship and loyalty

Significance of Chaucer's narrative changes

• Expanded role of Pandarus
  • Chaucer gives Pandarus a more prominent and complex role as facilitator of the lovers' relationship portraying him as a multifaceted character with his own motivations and flaws
  • Pandarus's actions and motivations explored in greater depth, adding to psychological richness of the story and highlighting themes of friendship, loyalty, and moral ambiguity
  • Increased importance of Pandarus may reflect Chaucer's interest in dynamics of human relationships and the ways in which individuals navigate social and emotional challenges
• Development of Criseyde's character
  • Chaucer presents Criseyde as a more multifaceted and sympathetic character compared to Boccaccio's Criseida, emphasizing her intelligence, vulnerability, and the difficult choices she faces
  • Criseyde's inner conflicts and reasons behind her eventual betrayal explored more thoroughly, providing insight into the complexities of human nature and the pressures faced by women in medieval society
  • This change allows Chaucer to create a more nuanced and relatable portrayal of Criseyde, inviting readers to empathize with her struggles and consider the societal constraints that shape her actions
• Addition of narrator's voice and commentary
  • Chaucer's narrator offers philosophical reflections and comments on characters' actions, serving as a guide and interpreter for the reader
  • Narrator's presence adds depth to the story and encourages reader to consider broader implications of the events, such as the nature of love, the role of fate, and the consequences of human choices
  • This addition showcases Chaucer's skill as a storyteller and his ability to engage with his audience on both an emotional and intellectual level, inviting them to participate in the unfolding of the narrative
• Modification of ending and its implications
  • Chaucer's ending differs from Boccaccio's, with a greater emphasis on consequences of characters' actions and the ultimate fate of their souls
  • Epilogue, in which Troilus's soul ascends to the heavens, offers a Christian perspective on the story, suggesting the possibility of redemption and the importance of divine grace
  • These changes demonstrate Chaucer's ability to adapt the original material to suit his artistic goals and the expectations of his audience, creating a work that is both faithful to its source and distinctly his own