2.4 In Rem and Quasi in Rem Jurisdiction

In rem and quasi in rem jurisdiction are crucial concepts in civil procedure. They allow courts to exercise power over property, either to determine rights in the property itself or to satisfy claims against individuals. These forms of jurisdiction complement personal jurisdiction, expanding courts' reach.

Understanding the distinctions between in rem and quasi in rem is key. In rem affects all interests in property, while quasi in rem is limited to the defendant's interest. Both face constitutional scrutiny, with quasi in rem jurisdiction significantly limited by the Shaffer v. Heitner decision requiring minimum contacts.

In Rem Jurisdiction

Definition and Application

Top images from around the web for Definition and Application

• 

  USMS Asset Forfeiture poster | One of several mission specif… | Flickr View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Types of Law and Jurisdiction | Texas Government 1.0 View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  U. S. Courts: How do courts interpret contracts and laws? | United States Government View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  USMS Asset Forfeiture poster | One of several mission specif… | Flickr View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Types of Law and Jurisdiction | Texas Government 1.0 View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Definition and Application

• 

  USMS Asset Forfeiture poster | One of several mission specif… | Flickr View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Types of Law and Jurisdiction | Texas Government 1.0 View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  U. S. Courts: How do courts interpret contracts and laws? | United States Government View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  USMS Asset Forfeiture poster | One of several mission specif… | Flickr View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Types of Law and Jurisdiction | Texas Government 1.0 View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• In rem jurisdiction empowers courts to adjudicate rights over specific property within their territorial jurisdiction
• Based on property presence rather than personal jurisdiction over parties
• Binding on all parties with property interest, even without personal service
• Typically used in real property disputes, maritime law, and asset forfeiture proceedings
• Allows courts to settle title disputes, enforce liens, or determine ownership rights
• Examples include foreclosure proceedings (mortgage lenders) or admiralty cases (salvage rights)

Key Characteristics

• Focuses on the property itself, not personal claims against individuals
• Court's power extends to the entire property value, not limited by defendant's equity
• Judgment affects property rights directly (transfer of title, sale of property)
• Notice requirements less stringent than in personam cases (publication may suffice)
• Property must have sufficient connection to forum state (minimum contacts test)

In Rem vs Quasi In Rem Jurisdiction

Quasi In Rem Jurisdiction Overview

• Allows courts to adjudicate rights over defendant's property within territorial jurisdiction
• Used to resolve claims against defendant personally, not about property rights
• Divided into two types:
  • Type I: Pre-existing claims related to the property (mechanic's lien)
  • Type II: Using unrelated property to satisfy claim against defendant (attaching bank account for unrelated debt)
• Court's power limited to property value, unlike in rem affecting property rights
• Significantly limited by Shaffer v. Heitner decision (minimum contacts standard)

Key Differences

• Purpose: In rem determines property rights, quasi in rem resolves personal claims
• Scope: In rem affects all interests in property, quasi in rem limited to defendant's interest
• Judgment: In rem binds all parties, quasi in rem only binds named parties
• Constitutional scrutiny: Quasi in rem faces stricter due process requirements
• Examples:
  • In rem: Quiet title action for disputed land ownership
  • Quasi in rem: Attaching non-resident's local bank account for out-of-state car accident claim

Property Subject to In Rem Jurisdiction

Real and Tangible Property

• Real property (land, buildings) most common for in rem jurisdiction
• Tangible personal property subject to both in rem and quasi in rem jurisdiction
  • Vehicles (cars, boats)
  • Valuable items (jewelry, artwork)
• Location within court's territorial jurisdiction crucial for establishing jurisdiction
• Examples:
  • Foreclosure on a house (in rem)
  • Seizing a yacht for maritime lien (in rem)
  • Attaching a valuable painting to satisfy unrelated debt (quasi in rem)

Intangible and Emerging Property Types

• Intangible property subject to quasi in rem jurisdiction through attachment or garnishment
  • Bank accounts
  • Stocks and bonds
  • Insurance policies
• Intellectual property rights may be subject to in rem jurisdiction in specialized proceedings
  • Patent infringement cases
  • Trademark disputes
• Virtual assets emerging as new frontier for in rem and quasi in rem jurisdiction
  • Domain names (cybersquatting cases)
  • Cryptocurrency wallets
• Examples:
  • Garnishing wages for child support (quasi in rem)
  • In rem proceeding against infringing domain name under ACPA

Constitutional Limits on In Rem Jurisdiction

Due Process Requirements

• Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause limits in rem and quasi in rem jurisdiction
• Shaffer v. Heitner (1977) established minimum contacts test for all state-court jurisdiction
• In rem jurisdiction: Property presence may satisfy due process if subject of litigation
• Quasi in rem jurisdiction faces stricter scrutiny, especially Type II cases
• Courts consider factors:
  • Nature and quality of defendant's contacts with forum state
  • Relationship between property and litigation
  • State's interest in adjudicating dispute
• Examples:
  • Sufficient: Foreclosure on in-state property
  • Insufficient: Attaching unrelated property for out-of-state tort claim

Notice and Enforcement

• Notice and opportunity to be heard fundamental due process requirements
• Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. established notice standards
  • Reasonable efforts to provide actual notice required
  • Publication notice may suffice for unknown parties in in rem cases
• Full Faith and Credit Clause requires interstate recognition of valid judgments
  • Limited exceptions (fraud, lack of jurisdiction)
• Examples:
  • Sufficient notice: Certified mail to property owner's last known address
  • Insufficient notice: Mere publication for known defendant in quasi in rem case