You have 3 free guides left 😟
Unlock your guides
You have 3 free guides left 😟
Unlock your guides

Personal jurisdiction is the power courts have to make binding decisions over parties in lawsuits. It's rooted in territorial sovereignty and fairness principles. Traditional bases include physical presence, consent, and domicile for individuals, while corporations are subject to jurisdiction in their state of incorporation and principal place of business.

These traditional bases were established before the expansion of jurisdiction through and the test. They apply differently to individuals versus corporate entities. Understanding these foundations is crucial for grasping how courts determine their authority over defendants in civil cases.

Personal Jurisdiction Bases

Traditional Foundations and Principles

Top images from around the web for Traditional Foundations and Principles
Top images from around the web for Traditional Foundations and Principles
  • Personal jurisdiction grants courts power to make binding decisions over parties in lawsuits
  • Rooted in territorial sovereignty and fairness principles
  • Established before expansion through long-arm statutes and minimum contacts test
  • Traditional bases include physical presence, consent, and domicile
  • For corporations, state of incorporation and principal place of business serve as jurisdiction bases

Specific Bases for Individuals and Corporations

  • Physical presence within forum state at service time establishes jurisdiction
  • Consent confers jurisdiction through express agreement or implied actions
  • Domicile serves as basis even during temporary absence from forum state
  • State of incorporation and principal place of business establish corporate jurisdiction
  • These bases apply differently to individuals versus corporate entities

Physical Presence for Jurisdiction

  • Derived from 1877 Supreme Court case Pennoyer v. Neff emphasizing territorial sovereignty
  • Burnham v. Superior Court (1990) affirmed "tag jurisdiction" rule
  • Physical presence applies to both individual defendants and corporate entities
  • Modern jurisprudence has somewhat limited physical presence jurisdiction scope
  • Shift towards more flexible approaches based on fairness and substantial connections

Types and Applications of Physical Presence

  • Refers to defendant's bodily presence within forum state's territorial boundaries at service time
  • allows exercise over temporarily present defendants
  • "Tag jurisdiction" rule deems personal service on physically present defendant sufficient
  • Applies regardless of defendant's presence duration or purpose
  • Criticized for potential unfairness and forum shopping abuse (plaintiffs choosing favorable courts)
  • Corporate physical presence often determined by office locations or business activities
  • Express consent occurs through explicit agreement (forum selection clauses in contracts)
  • Implied consent arises from actions (voluntarily appearing in court without contesting jurisdiction)
  • State laws often deem certain activities as implied consent (operating motor vehicles)
  • Corporate registration to do business in a state often interpreted as consent
  • Consent validity subject to limitations (unconscionability, public policy considerations)
  • Ongoing legal debate surrounds enforceability, especially in consumer contracts
  • Courts may invalidate consent if deemed unfair or against public policy
  • Implied consent through corporate registration increasingly scrutinized by courts
  • Consent in adhesion contracts (pre-printed, take-it-or-leave-it agreements) faces heightened scrutiny
  • International agreements may impact consent-based jurisdiction (Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements)
  • Some states have passed laws limiting consent-based jurisdiction (New York's corporate registration law)

Domicile and Jurisdiction Over Individuals

Defining and Determining Domicile

  • Refers to person's permanent home or intended place of return
  • Distinct from citizenship and residency, requires physical presence and intent to remain indefinitely
  • Person can have only one domicile at a time
  • Courts consider factors to determine domicile (voter registration, driver's license, tax filings)
  • Additional factors include property ownership, community ties, and stated intentions
  • Domicile of origin retained until new domicile of choice established
  • Allows jurisdiction over individual even when physically absent from forum state
  • Creates complexities with multiple residences or temporary absences (education, work)
  • Disputes may arise over person's true intentions regarding permanent home
  • Domicile-based jurisdiction can conflict with physical presence jurisdiction
  • Special rules may apply for military personnel, students, or those with multiple residences
  • International contexts add further complexity to domicile determination (tax treaties, citizenship laws)
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.


© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.

© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.
Glossary
Glossary