9.3 Motions for New Trial

Motions for a new trial are a key post-trial tool in civil procedure. They allow parties to challenge verdicts based on issues like new evidence or jury misconduct. Understanding the grounds, procedural requirements, and strategic considerations is crucial for effectively using this option.

Judges have broad discretion in granting new trials, weighing factors like error severity and potential outcomes. This power is balanced against respecting jury decisions and judicial economy. Attorneys must carefully consider the pros and cons before pursuing this strategy.

Grounds for a New Trial

Common Grounds and Procedural Requirements

Top images from around the web for Common Grounds and Procedural Requirements

• 

  Civil Procedure - 1L Survival Guide - Research Guides at Florida State University College of Law ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Civil Procedure - 1L Survival Guide - Research Guides at Florida State University College of Law ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 1

Top images from around the web for Common Grounds and Procedural Requirements

• 

  Civil Procedure - 1L Survival Guide - Research Guides at Florida State University College of Law ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Civil Procedure - 1L Survival Guide - Research Guides at Florida State University College of Law ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 1

• Motion for a new trial requests setting aside a verdict and obtaining a new trial based on specific grounds outlined in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59
• Common grounds include newly discovered evidence, juror misconduct, improper jury instructions, prejudicial errors of law, and verdicts against the weight of the evidence
• Filing deadline falls within 28 days after the entry of judgment, unless the court orders otherwise
• Moving party bears the burden of demonstrating the necessity of a new trial with specific supporting reasons
• Motion requires accompanying affidavits, declarations, or other supporting evidence to substantiate the grounds
• Some jurisdictions consider a motion for a new trial a prerequisite to filing an appeal, preserving certain issues for appellate review
• Opposing party retains the right to file a response within a timeframe specified by local rules or court order

Evidence and Burden of Proof

• Newly discovered evidence must be material, not merely cumulative, and likely to produce a different result at a new trial
• Juror misconduct allegations require clear and convincing evidence of improper external influences or egregious behavior
• Improper jury instructions must have materially affected the outcome of the trial
• Prejudicial errors of law must have significantly impacted the fairness of the proceedings
• Verdicts against the weight of the evidence require a showing that the jury's decision was manifestly unjust or clearly erroneous
• Burden of proof varies depending on the specific ground asserted (clear and convincing evidence for juror misconduct, preponderance of evidence for newly discovered evidence)

Discretion in Granting New Trials

Judicial Authority and Limitations

• Trial court judge possesses broad discretionary power in granting or denying a motion for a new trial, established by longstanding legal precedent
• Judge must consider the totality of the circumstances and ensure justice is served when exercising discretion
• Court may weigh evidence and assess witness credibility, unlike in a motion for judgment as a matter of law
• Trial judge's decision receives substantial deference on appeal, only overturned for clear abuse of discretion
• Court may order a new trial on all issues or limit it to specific issues, as outlined in Rule 59(a)
• Conditional granting of a new trial motion subject to rejection of remittitur by the prevailing party addresses excessive damages
• In jury trials, court must exercise caution to avoid usurping the jury's role as fact-finder when considering granting a new trial

Factors Influencing Judicial Decision-Making

• Severity and impact of alleged errors or misconduct on the fairness of the trial
• Strength and credibility of evidence supporting the motion for a new trial
• Potential for a different outcome if a new trial were granted
• Efficiency and judicial economy considerations
• Balancing the interests of justice against the finality of judgments
• Consistency with legal precedents and principles of fairness
• Public policy implications of granting or denying the motion

Strategic Considerations for New Trials

Tactical Advantages and Risks

• Filing a motion for a new trial serves as a strategic tool to preserve issues for appeal and potentially correct errors without appellate review
• Opportunity to present newly discovered evidence that could significantly impact case outcome
• Addresses juror misconduct or improper influence that may have tainted the verdict
• Weighing potential for a more favorable outcome against costs, time, and resources required for a new trial
• Successful motion creates leverage for settlement negotiations by reopening possibility of a different verdict
• Decision to seek a new trial considers strength of grounds, likelihood of success, and potential impact on client relationships and public perception
• Partial new trial on specific issues offers strategic option to address particular errors while preserving favorable aspects of original verdict

Alternatives and Complementary Strategies

• Comparing benefits of seeking a new trial to other post-trial options (judgment as a matter of law, appeal)
• Utilizing motion for a new trial in conjunction with other post-trial motions to maximize chances of relief
• Considering alternative dispute resolution methods (mediation, arbitration) as potential solutions
• Evaluating the impact of seeking a new trial on potential settlement negotiations
• Assessing the collateral consequences of a new trial on related litigation or business interests
• Analyzing the potential for issue preclusion or claim preclusion in future litigation based on the outcome of a new trial motion
• Strategizing the timing of the motion in relation to other post-trial proceedings and potential appeals