🔢Coding Theory Unit 11 – Turbo Codes and Iterative Decoding
Turbo codes revolutionized error correction in the 1990s, approaching the theoretical limits of reliable communication over noisy channels. These high-performance codes use parallel convolutional encoders and interleavers, achieving excellent error correction at low signal-to-noise ratios.
The iterative decoding process is key to turbo codes' success. Soft-input, soft-output decoders exchange extrinsic information, progressively refining decoding decisions. This approach enables turbo codes to outperform previous coding schemes, finding applications in mobile networks, satellite communications, and deep space missions.
Turbo codes are a class of high-performance forward error correction codes that approach the Shannon limit for reliable communication over noisy channels
Consist of two or more constituent convolutional codes concatenated in parallel, separated by interleavers that randomize the input data
Employ iterative decoding algorithms, such as the BCJR algorithm or the MAP (Maximum A Posteriori) algorithm, to achieve near-optimal decoding performance
Utilize soft-input, soft-output (SISO) decoders that exchange extrinsic information between the constituent decoders to improve decoding accuracy
Extrinsic information represents the additional knowledge gained by each decoder about the transmitted bits during the decoding process
Achieve excellent error correction capabilities at low signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) and high code rates
Exhibit an error floor phenomenon at high SNRs due to the presence of low-weight codewords in the code structure
Offer a trade-off between decoding complexity and performance, with more iterations generally leading to better error correction
Historical Context and Development
Turbo codes were introduced by Claude Berrou, Alain Glavieux, and Punya Thitimajshima in 1993, representing a significant breakthrough in coding theory
Developed as a practical coding scheme that could approach the theoretical limits of channel capacity, as defined by Claude Shannon in 1948
Inspired by the concept of iterative decoding, which was previously explored in the context of low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes by Robert Gallager in the 1960s
Gained widespread attention due to their exceptional performance, outperforming existing coding schemes at the time
Underwent rapid development and refinement in the years following their introduction, with various improvements and variations proposed by researchers
These include multiple turbo codes, non-binary turbo codes, and turbo codes with different constituent encoders and interleaver designs
Adopted in several communication standards, such as 3G and 4G mobile networks (CDMA2000, UMTS, LTE), satellite communications (DVB-RCS), and deep space communications (CCSDS)
Turbo Code Structure
Turbo codes are composed of two or more recursive systematic convolutional (RSC) encoders connected in parallel
The input data sequence is encoded by the first RSC encoder, while an interleaved version of the input data is encoded by the second RSC encoder
The interleaver permutes the order of the input bits, decorrelating the inputs to the two encoders and improving the code's distance properties
Common interleaver designs include block interleavers, random interleavers, and S-random interleavers
The outputs of the RSC encoders, along with the original input data (systematic bits), form the codeword of the turbo code
Puncturing can be applied to the parity bits generated by the RSC encoders to achieve higher code rates and reduce the transmission overhead
The choice of the constituent RSC encoders (generator polynomials, constraint lengths) and the interleaver design significantly impact the performance of the turbo code
Encoding Process
The encoding process of a turbo code involves the following steps:
The input data sequence is fed into the first RSC encoder, which generates a set of parity bits based on the input bits and its internal state
The input data sequence is interleaved using a predefined interleaver pattern, reordering the bits in a pseudo-random manner
The interleaved data sequence is fed into the second RSC encoder, which generates another set of parity bits
The systematic bits (original input data) and the parity bits from both RSC encoders are multiplexed to form the output codeword
The systematic bits are typically transmitted along with the parity bits to facilitate the decoding process and improve the code's overall performance
Puncturing can be applied to the parity bits to achieve higher code rates, selectively removing some of the parity bits according to a predefined puncturing pattern
The resulting codeword has a length that depends on the input data length, the code rate, and the puncturing scheme used
Iterative Decoding Algorithm
Turbo codes are decoded using an iterative decoding algorithm that exchanges soft information between the constituent decoders to progressively refine the decoding decisions
The iterative decoding process typically involves the following steps:
The received codeword is demultiplexed into the systematic bits and the parity bits corresponding to each RSC encoder
The systematic bits and the parity bits of the first RSC encoder are fed into the first SISO decoder, which computes the extrinsic information for each bit based on the received values and the a priori information from the previous iteration
The extrinsic information from the first decoder is interleaved and used as the a priori information for the second SISO decoder
The systematic bits (after interleaving) and the parity bits of the second RSC encoder are fed into the second SISO decoder, which computes its own extrinsic information
The extrinsic information from the second decoder is deinterleaved and used as the a priori information for the first decoder in the next iteration
Steps 2-5 are repeated for a fixed number of iterations or until a certain stopping criterion is met (e.g., convergence of the decoded bits)
The SISO decoders commonly employ the BCJR algorithm or the MAP algorithm to compute the extrinsic information, taking into account the trellis structure of the constituent RSC encoders
The exchange of soft information between the decoders allows them to progressively improve their estimates of the transmitted bits, leading to better decoding performance with each iteration
Performance Analysis
Turbo codes exhibit excellent error correction performance, particularly at low SNRs and high code rates
The performance of turbo codes is often evaluated using bit error rate (BER) or frame error rate (FER) curves, which plot the error probability against the SNR or the Eb/N0 (energy per bit to noise power spectral density ratio)
Turbo codes can achieve BER values close to the Shannon limit for a given channel capacity, outperforming conventional coding schemes like convolutional codes and Reed-Solomon codes
The performance of turbo codes improves with increasing interleaver sizes, as larger interleavers provide better decorrelation between the inputs to the constituent encoders
However, larger interleaver sizes also increase the decoding latency and memory requirements
The number of decoding iterations also affects the performance, with more iterations generally leading to lower error rates at the cost of increased decoding complexity
Turbo codes exhibit an error floor phenomenon at high SNRs, where the error rate decays more slowly due to the presence of low-weight codewords in the code structure
The error floor can be lowered by careful design of the constituent encoders and the interleaver, as well as by using techniques like doping or concatenation with outer codes
The performance of turbo codes can be further enhanced by using advanced decoding algorithms, such as the log-MAP algorithm or the max-log-MAP algorithm, which provide a good trade-off between decoding complexity and performance
Applications and Use Cases
Turbo codes have found widespread application in various communication systems that require reliable data transmission over noisy channels
Mobile communication networks: Turbo codes are used in 3G and 4G standards, such as CDMA2000, UMTS, and LTE, to ensure reliable voice and data transmission in the presence of multipath fading, interference, and other channel impairments
Satellite communications: Turbo codes are employed in satellite communication standards, such as DVB-RCS (Digital Video Broadcasting - Return Channel via Satellite), to enable efficient and reliable data transmission over satellite links
Deep space communications: Turbo codes are used by space agencies, such as NASA and ESA, for deep space missions, where the signal-to-noise ratio is extremely low and the communication delay is significant
The Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems (CCSDS) has standardized turbo codes for use in deep space communications
Wireless local area networks (WLANs): Turbo codes can be used in high-speed WLAN standards, such as IEEE 802.11n and 802.11ac, to improve the data throughput and range of the network
Storage systems: Turbo codes can be applied to magnetic recording systems and flash memories to enhance the reliability of data storage and reduce the bit error rate
Advanced Topics and Future Directions
Non-binary turbo codes: Turbo codes can be extended to work with non-binary alphabets, such as GF(2m), to improve the code's distance properties and reduce the error floor
Turbo equalization: Turbo codes can be combined with equalization techniques to mitigate the effects of intersymbol interference (ISI) in frequency-selective channels
Turbo equalization iteratively exchanges soft information between the equalizer and the turbo decoder to jointly optimize the equalization and decoding processes
Turbo-like codes: The principles of turbo codes can be applied to other coding schemes, such as low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes and repeat-accumulate (RA) codes, to create powerful hybrid coding schemes
Spatially coupled turbo codes: Spatially coupled turbo codes, also known as convolutional turbo codes, introduce a spatial coupling between the constituent encoders to improve the code's distance properties and reduce the error floor
Quantum turbo codes: Turbo codes can be adapted for use in quantum error correction schemes, where they can help protect quantum information from decoherence and other errors
Machine learning-based decoding: Machine learning techniques, such as deep learning and reinforcement learning, can be applied to the decoding of turbo codes to improve the decoding performance and reduce the computational complexity
Joint source-channel coding: Turbo codes can be integrated with source coding techniques, such as compression and quantization, to create joint source-channel coding schemes that optimize the end-to-end performance of the communication system