13.2 Measurement and Assessment of Intelligence

Intelligence testing has come a long way since its inception in the early 20th century. From the Binet-Simon Scale to modern assessments, these tests have evolved to measure cognitive abilities more accurately and comprehensively.

Key concepts in intelligence testing include standardization, reliability, and validity. Various types of tests exist, from individual to group assessments, each designed to measure different aspects of cognitive function while considering ethical implications and limitations.

History and Development of Intelligence Testing

Evolution of intelligence testing

Top images from around the web for Evolution of intelligence testing

• 

  Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Classement de QI - IQ classification - xcv.wiki View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Measures of Intelligence | Introduction to Psychology View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Classement de QI - IQ classification - xcv.wiki View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Evolution of intelligence testing

• 

  Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Classement de QI - IQ classification - xcv.wiki View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Measures of Intelligence | Introduction to Psychology View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Classement de QI - IQ classification - xcv.wiki View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Binet-Simon Scale (1905) pioneered practical intelligence testing aimed at identifying children needing special education
• Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales adapted Binet-Simon work introduced Intelligence Quotient (IQ) concept (Lewis Terman, 1916)
• Wechsler Scales developed by David Wechsler (1939) incorporated separate verbal and performance scales
• Modern Assessments expanded testing options (Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test, Raven's Progressive Matrices, Cognitive Ability Test)

Key Concepts and Types of Intelligence Tests

Fundamentals of test design

• Standardization ensures uniform procedures for test administration and scoring maintains consistency across test-takers and administrators
• Reliability encompasses test-retest consistency over time and internal coherence of test items
• Validity includes content (measures intended construct), construct (aligns with intelligence theories), and predictive (forecasts future performance) aspects
• Norms provide reference groups for comparison typically based on representative population samples

Types of intelligence assessments

• Individual Tests administered one-on-one (Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, Stanford-Binet)
• Group Tests given to multiple individuals simultaneously (Otis-Lennon School Ability Test, Cognitive Abilities Test)
• Verbal Tests assess language-based skills including vocabulary, comprehension, and verbal reasoning
• Nonverbal Tests minimize language requirements focus on visual-spatial reasoning and pattern recognition (Raven's Progressive Matrices, Leiter International Performance Scale)

Interpretation and Implications of Intelligence Testing

Interpretation of test scores

• Intelligence Quotient (IQ) uses standard score with mean 100 and standard deviation 15 calculated using $IQ = (Mental Age / Chronological Age) * 100$
• Percentile Ranks indicate percentage scoring below given score with 50th percentile representing average performance
• Age Equivalents compare individual performance to typical performance at different ages limited utility due to developmental variations

Ethics in intelligence testing

• Educational Settings risk potential bias in test content and administration may lead to labeling and self-fulfilling prophecies
• Employment Contexts involve legal considerations (job relevance, adverse impact) and potential discrimination based on results
• Cultural Considerations address test bias across different groups and challenges in creating culturally fair assessments
• Privacy and Confidentiality require ethical handling of test results and personal information
• Limitations of Intelligence Tests acknowledge incomplete measurement of cognitive abilities and potential neglect factors like motivation or creativity