2.3 Probability theory and statistics

Probability theory and statistics form the backbone of quantitative neuroscience. These tools help researchers make sense of noisy neural data, from single-cell recordings to brain-wide imaging. They're essential for drawing reliable conclusions about brain function and behavior.

In this section, we'll cover key concepts like probability distributions, statistical inference, and hypothesis testing. You'll learn how to apply these methods to real neuroscience problems, like analyzing spike trains or interpreting fMRI results. Let's dive into the math behind brain science!

Probability calculations

Fundamental rules and theorems

Top images from around the web for Fundamental rules and theorems

• 

  Teorema de Bayes - Bayes' theorem - abcdef.wiki View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Bayes' theorem - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Teorema del límite central - Central limit theorem - xcv.wiki View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Teorema de Bayes - Bayes' theorem - abcdef.wiki View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Bayes' theorem - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Fundamental rules and theorems

• 

  Teorema de Bayes - Bayes' theorem - abcdef.wiki View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Bayes' theorem - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Teorema del límite central - Central limit theorem - xcv.wiki View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Teorema de Bayes - Bayes' theorem - abcdef.wiki View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Bayes' theorem - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Probability theory quantifies uncertainty in neuroscience experiments and data analysis
• Law of total probability calculates event A probability by summing A probabilities with each outcome of event B
• Bayes' theorem relates conditional and marginal probabilities, updating probabilities with new evidence
• Central limit theorem states sample means distribution approaches normal as sample size increases
• Independence of events occurs when one event doesn't affect another's probability
• Probability distributions model random variables in neuroscience data
  • Binomial distribution models number of successes in fixed number of trials
  • Poisson distribution models rare events in fixed time or space intervals
  • Normal distribution models continuous variables with symmetric bell-shaped curve

Applications in neuroscience

• Quantify uncertainty in neural spike train data using Poisson distribution
• Model reaction times in cognitive experiments with normal distribution
• Use Bayesian updating to refine estimates of synaptic strength based on new observations
• Apply central limit theorem to justify normality assumptions in large-scale brain imaging studies
• Assess independence of neural firing patterns across different brain regions
• Calculate joint probabilities of multiple neurons firing simultaneously using multiplication rule

Statistical inference for neuroscience

Sampling and estimation techniques

• Statistical inference draws conclusions about neural populations from sample data
• Sampling techniques collect representative data from neural populations
  • Simple random sampling gives each neuron equal chance of selection
  • Stratified sampling divides population into subgroups (cortical layers) before sampling
• Confidence intervals quantify uncertainty in point estimates
  • 95% confidence interval for mean firing rate: 10-15 Hz
  • Interpret as range containing true population parameter with 95% probability
• Power analysis determines sample size needed to detect meaningful effect
  • Example: 100 neurons required to detect 20% change in firing rate with 80% power

Hypothesis testing fundamentals

• Hypothesis testing involves formulating null and alternative hypotheses
• Choose significance level (α) to control Type I error rate
  • Common choices: α = 0.05 or α = 0.01
• Calculate test statistics to make decisions about population parameters
  • t-statistic for comparing means of two groups
  • F-statistic for ANOVA comparing multiple groups
• Type I error (false positive) occurs when rejecting true null hypothesis
• Type II error (false negative) occurs when failing to reject false null hypothesis
• Multiple comparison corrections essential for numerous tests
  • Bonferroni correction: divide α by number of tests
  • False discovery rate methods control proportion of false positives

Parameter estimation and hypothesis testing

Maximum likelihood estimation

• Maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) finds parameter values maximizing likelihood function
• Likelihood function represents probability of observing data given parameters
• Apply MLE to estimate neuron tuning curve parameters from spike count data
• Likelihood ratio tests compare nested models to test specific hypotheses
  • Test significance of additional parameter in neural encoding model
• Model selection tools balance fit and complexity
  • Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) penalizes model complexity
  • Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) penalizes complexity more strongly than AIC
• Profile likelihood constructs confidence intervals for complex model parameters
  • Example: confidence interval for time constant in neural dynamics model

Advanced estimation methods

• Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm finds MLEs with latent variables or missing data
  • Apply EM to estimate parameters in mixture model of neural subpopulations
• Bayesian inference incorporates prior knowledge and computes posterior distributions
  • Use Bayesian approach to estimate receptive field properties with sparse priors
• Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods sample from posterior distributions
  • Gibbs sampling for high-dimensional parameter spaces in neural network models
• Variational inference approximates posterior distributions in complex models
  • Estimate parameters in large-scale neural population models

Significance of results

Parametric and non-parametric tests

• Parametric tests assume specific data distributions
  • t-test compares means of two groups (control vs. treatment in neural recordings)
  • ANOVA compares means of multiple groups (different brain regions or conditions)
• Non-parametric tests make fewer distribution assumptions
  • Wilcoxon rank-sum test compares two groups without normality assumption
  • Kruskal-Wallis test extends to multiple groups
• Effect size measures quantify magnitude of observed effects
  • Cohen's d for standardized mean difference between two groups
  • η² (eta-squared) for proportion of variance explained in ANOVA

Advanced significance assessment

• Permutation tests provide distribution-free approach to hypothesis testing
  • Randomly reassign group labels to generate null distribution
  • Apply to test for differences in functional connectivity patterns
• Bootstrapping methods estimate sampling distributions by resampling with replacement
  • Construct confidence intervals for complex statistics (correlation between brain regions)
• Meta-analysis combines results from multiple neuroscience studies
  • Assess overall significance of brain activation patterns across fMRI studies
• Bayesian hypothesis testing uses Bayes factors to assess evidence
  • Compare models with and without effect of interest in neural data analysis
• Statistical power analysis crucial for interpreting non-significant results
  • Calculate power to detect clinically relevant effect in neurodegenerative disease study