20.1 Theories of Constitutional Interpretation

Constitutional interpretation is a crucial aspect of understanding and applying the Constitution. Originalism and Living Constitutionalism are two main approaches, each with its own strengths and weaknesses. Originalism focuses on the original meaning, while Living Constitutionalism adapts to contemporary values.

These interpretive theories significantly impact jurisprudence and shape constitutional law. Originalism often leads to limited federal power readings, while Living Constitutionalism has expanded individual rights. Other approaches like Pragmatism and Structuralism offer alternative perspectives, adding depth to constitutional analysis.

Constitutional Interpretation Approaches

Originalism

Top images from around the web for Originalism

• 

  Constitutions and Contracts: Was another new contract really necessary in 1787? | United States ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Constitution and Its Origins: Introduction – American Government View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Antonin Scalia and the challenge of originalism View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Constitutions and Contracts: Was another new contract really necessary in 1787? | United States ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Constitution and Its Origins: Introduction – American Government View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Originalism

• 

  Constitutions and Contracts: Was another new contract really necessary in 1787? | United States ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Constitution and Its Origins: Introduction – American Government View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Antonin Scalia and the challenge of originalism View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Constitutions and Contracts: Was another new contract really necessary in 1787? | United States ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Constitution and Its Origins: Introduction – American Government View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Seeks to understand the Constitution's meaning as it was understood by those who drafted and ratified it at the time of its enactment
• Textualism, a subset of originalism, focuses on the plain meaning of the Constitution's text
  • Does not consider external sources or the intentions of the Framers
• Intentionalism, another subset of originalism, seeks to interpret the Constitution based on the original intentions of the Framers and ratifiers

Living Constitutionalism

• Views the Constitution as a dynamic document that should be interpreted in light of contemporary values, social needs, and evolving understandings of rights and liberties
• Allows for the Constitution to adapt to changing times and values, ensuring its continued relevance
• May lead to subjective and unpredictable interpretations, as well as potential overreach by the judiciary

Other Interpretive Approaches

• Pragmatism emphasizes the practical consequences of constitutional interpretation and seeks to balance competing interests and adapt to changing circumstances
  • Offers flexibility and attention to real-world consequences
  • May lack a consistent and principled approach to interpretation, potentially leading to ad hoc decision-making
• Structuralism focuses on the Constitution's overall structure and the relationships between its various provisions
  • Emphasizes the separation of powers and federalism
  • Provides a holistic understanding of the Constitution and emphasizes the importance of institutional relationships
  • May overlook the specific text and historical context of individual provisions

Strengths and Weaknesses of Interpretation

Originalism Strengths and Weaknesses

• Provides a clear and stable framework for interpretation, grounding constitutional meaning in historical understanding
• Limits judicial discretion by tying interpretation to original understanding
• May struggle to address new issues and societal changes not contemplated by the Framers
• Can be difficult to determine the original understanding with certainty, as historical records may be incomplete or ambiguous

Living Constitutionalism Strengths and Weaknesses

• Allows for the Constitution to adapt to changing times and values, ensuring its continued relevance
• Recognizes that the Framers could not have anticipated all future developments and challenges
• May lead to subjective and unpredictable interpretations, as judges can read their own values into the Constitution
• Raises concerns about the legitimacy of judicial decision-making and the potential for overreach by the judiciary

Pragmatism and Structuralism Strengths and Weaknesses

• Pragmatism offers flexibility and attention to real-world consequences but may lack a consistent and principled approach
• Structuralism provides a holistic understanding of the Constitution but may overlook the specific text and historical context of individual provisions

Impact of Interpretation on Jurisprudence

Influence on Constitutional Cases and Law

• The choice of interpretive theory can significantly shape the outcome of constitutional cases and the development of constitutional law
• Originalist approaches have been influential in decisions related to the Second Amendment (D.C. v. Heller), the Commerce Clause (United States v. Lopez), and federalism (Printz v. United States)
  • Often leads to more limited readings of federal power and a greater emphasis on states' rights
• Living Constitutionalist approaches have been prominent in decisions expanding individual rights and liberties
  • Influential in cases related to privacy (Griswold v. Connecticut), due process (Obergefell v. Hodges), and equal protection (Brown v. Board of Education)

Role of Pragmatism and Structuralism

• Pragmatic considerations have played a role in cases involving complex policy issues
  • Evident in cases related to economic regulation (West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish), environmental protection (Massachusetts v. EPA), and national security (Korematsu v. United States)
• Structuralist approaches have been significant in cases involving the separation of powers
  • Influential in cases related to executive power (Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer), legislative authority (INS v. Chadha), and judicial review (Marbury v. Madison)

Schools of Constitutional Interpretation

Contrasting Originalism and Living Constitutionalism

• Originalism emphasizes fidelity to the original understanding, while Living Constitutionalism advocates for adaptation to contemporary values and needs
• Originalism tends to be associated with more conservative or restrained judicial philosophies, while Living Constitutionalism is often associated with more liberal or expansive approaches

Comparing Textualism and Intentionalism

• Textualism and Intentionalism, while both subsets of Originalism, differ in their focus
  • Textualism prioritizes the plain meaning of the text
  • Intentionalism seeks to discern the intentions of the Framers
• Both approaches aim to constrain judicial discretion by grounding interpretation in the original understanding, but they may lead to different conclusions in some cases

Alternative Frameworks: Pragmatism and Structuralism

• Pragmatism and Structuralism offer alternative frameworks that prioritize practical consequences and institutional relationships, respectively
• These approaches may be used in conjunction with other interpretive theories or as standalone frameworks for constitutional analysis
• Pragmatism and Structuralism can provide valuable insights and perspectives, but they may also be criticized for lacking a clear and consistent methodology

Fluidity and Overlap in Interpretive Approaches

• In practice, judges and scholars may draw upon multiple interpretive theories in their reasoning
• The boundaries between these approaches can be fluid and overlapping, with elements of different theories being combined or adapted in particular cases
• While interpretive theories provide useful frameworks for analysis, constitutional interpretation ultimately involves the exercise of judgment and the balancing of competing considerations