🦢Constitutional Law I Unit 21 – Constitutional Law: Current Issues & Challenges

Constitutional law grapples with key principles like separation of powers, federalism, and individual rights. These concepts shape the structure of government and protect civil liberties, evolving through landmark Supreme Court cases and historical events. Current debates focus on issues like abortion rights, gun control, and voting rights. The interpretation of constitutional provisions continues to spark discussions on originalism versus living constitutionalism, balancing government power with individual freedoms.

Key Constitutional Principles

  • Separation of powers divides government into three branches (executive, legislative, judicial) with checks and balances to prevent any one branch from becoming too powerful
    • Executive branch enforces laws, legislative branch makes laws, judicial branch interprets laws
  • Federalism establishes a system of shared power between the federal government and state governments
    • Federal government has enumerated powers (expressly granted in the Constitution) while states have reserved powers (not prohibited by the Constitution)
  • Supremacy Clause (Article VI, Clause 2) establishes that the Constitution, federal laws, and treaties are the supreme law of the land
    • State laws in conflict with federal law are generally invalid under the Supremacy Clause
  • Due Process Clause (5th and 14th Amendments) protects individuals from arbitrary government action and ensures fair legal proceedings
    • Substantive due process protects fundamental rights from government infringement
    • Procedural due process requires fair procedures before depriving someone of life, liberty, or property
  • Equal Protection Clause (14th Amendment) prohibits states from denying any person equal protection under the law
    • Strict scrutiny applied to suspect classifications (race, national origin) and fundamental rights
    • Intermediate scrutiny applied to quasi-suspect classifications (gender)
    • Rational basis review applied to most other classifications

Historical Context and Evolution

  • Federalist Papers (1787-1788) were a series of essays promoting ratification of the Constitution, with Federalist No. 10 (Madison) and Federalist No. 51 (Madison or Hamilton) being particularly influential
  • Bill of Rights (1791) added the first ten amendments to the Constitution to protect individual rights and limit federal power
    • Initially only applied to the federal government, but later incorporated to the states through the 14th Amendment
  • Reconstruction Amendments (13th, 14th, 15th) passed after the Civil War to abolish slavery, establish birthright citizenship, ensure equal protection, and protect voting rights
  • New Deal era (1930s) saw expansion of federal power and the Supreme Court's acceptance of broader congressional authority under the Commerce Clause and Necessary and Proper Clause
  • Warren Court (1953-1969) issued landmark decisions expanding civil rights and liberties, including Brown v. Board of Education (1954), Gideon v. Wainwright (1963), and Miranda v. Arizona (1966)
  • Modern era has seen debates over originalism vs. living constitutionalism, federalism, and the scope of individual rights

Major Supreme Court Cases

  • Marbury v. Madison (1803) established the principle of judicial review, allowing the Supreme Court to strike down laws as unconstitutional
  • McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) upheld broad congressional power under the Necessary and Proper Clause and established federal supremacy over the states
  • Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) interpreted the Commerce Clause broadly, allowing Congress to regulate interstate commerce
  • Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) upheld racial segregation under the "separate but equal" doctrine
    • Overturned by Brown v. Board of Education (1954), which held that segregated schools are inherently unequal
  • Lochner v. New York (1905) struck down a state labor law under a theory of economic substantive due process, ushering in the "Lochner era" of judicial activism
  • Korematsu v. United States (1944) upheld the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II, applying strict scrutiny but finding a compelling government interest
  • Roe v. Wade (1973) recognized a constitutional right to privacy that includes the right to abortion
    • Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992) reaffirmed the central holding of Roe but modified the legal standard
  • Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) held that the fundamental right to marry extends to same-sex couples under the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses

Current Constitutional Debates

  • Abortion rights and the future of Roe v. Wade, particularly after the appointment of conservative justices to the Supreme Court
  • Second Amendment rights and gun control measures, with debates over the individual right to bear arms and the scope of permissible regulations
  • Affirmative action in education and employment, with challenges to race-conscious admissions policies and diversity initiatives
  • Voting rights and election integrity, including debates over voter ID laws, gerrymandering, and the Voting Rights Act
  • Religious liberty and accommodations, with conflicts between religious freedom and anti-discrimination laws (Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission)
  • Presidential powers and impeachment, particularly in the context of the Trump presidency and the January 6th Capitol riot
  • Police misconduct and qualified immunity, with calls for reform in the wake of high-profile police killings (George Floyd, Breonna Taylor)

Civil Liberties and Rights

  • First Amendment protects freedom of speech, religion, press, assembly, and petition
    • Some categories of speech have less protection (obscenity, defamation, fighting words, true threats)
    • Government can place reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions on speech
  • Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms for self-defense (District of Columbia v. Heller)
    • Right is not unlimited and can be subject to reasonable regulations
  • Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures and requires probable cause for warrants
    • Exceptions include exigent circumstances, plain view, and searches incident to arrest
  • Eighth Amendment prohibits cruel and unusual punishment and excessive fines
    • Proportionality analysis applied to non-capital sentences (Solem v. Helm)
    • Evolving standards of decency used to evaluate capital punishment (Roper v. Simmons, Kennedy v. Louisiana)
  • Fourteenth Amendment incorporates most of the Bill of Rights to apply to the states and protects substantive and procedural due process rights
    • Substantive due process protects fundamental rights (privacy, marriage, contraception, abortion)
    • Procedural due process requires notice and a hearing before depriving someone of life, liberty, or property

Separation of Powers

  • Legislative power vested in Congress (Article I), which has the power to make laws, declare war, and control the budget
    • Bicameral legislature with the House of Representatives and the Senate
  • Executive power vested in the President (Article II), who serves as head of state, commander-in-chief, and chief law enforcement officer
    • President has the power to veto legislation, make treaties, and appoint federal judges and executive officials
  • Judicial power vested in the Supreme Court and lower federal courts (Article III), with the power to interpret laws and exercise judicial review
    • Judges appointed by the President with Senate confirmation and serve life tenure during good behavior
  • Checks and balances ensure no one branch becomes too powerful
    • Congress can override presidential vetoes, impeach federal officials, and control the budget
    • President can veto legislation and appoint federal judges
    • Supreme Court can strike down laws and executive actions as unconstitutional

Federalism Issues

  • Commerce Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3) grants Congress the power to regulate interstate commerce
    • Expansive interpretation during the New Deal era (Wickard v. Filburn) but some limits recognized in recent cases (United States v. Lopez, United States v. Morrison)
  • Tenth Amendment reserves powers not delegated to the federal government to the states or the people
    • Anti-Commandeering Doctrine prohibits the federal government from compelling states to enforce federal laws (Printz v. United States, New York v. United States)
  • Eleventh Amendment grants states sovereign immunity from lawsuits by citizens of other states or foreign countries
    • Exceptions include suits by the federal government, suits by other states, and suits against state officials for prospective relief (Ex parte Young)
  • Preemption occurs when federal law supersedes conflicting state law under the Supremacy Clause
    • Express preemption when a federal statute explicitly preempts state law
    • Implied preemption when state law conflicts with or impedes federal objectives
  • Cooperative federalism involves federal-state collaboration and shared responsibility in areas like education, healthcare, and environmental protection
    • Grants-in-aid and conditional spending encourage state compliance with federal priorities

Constitutional Interpretation Methods

  • Originalism interprets the Constitution based on its original meaning at the time of ratification
    • Textualism focuses on the plain meaning of the constitutional text
    • Original intent looks to the intentions of the Framers
    • Original public meaning examines how the public would have understood the text at the time
  • Living constitutionalism views the Constitution as a dynamic document that adapts to changing times and values
    • Considers evolving social, political, and economic conditions
    • Looks to contemporary norms and the practical consequences of decisions
  • Structural interpretation derives meaning from the Constitution's structure and the relationships it creates between government institutions
    • Separation of powers, checks and balances, and federalism principles
  • Precedent and stare decisis give weight to prior Supreme Court decisions and promote stability in the law
    • Horizontal stare decisis binds the Supreme Court to its own precedents
    • Vertical stare decisis requires lower courts to follow Supreme Court precedent
  • Balancing tests weigh competing interests and consider factors like government purpose, means-end fit, and burdens on individual rights
    • Strict scrutiny, intermediate scrutiny, and rational basis review


© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.

© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.