Project analysis and evaluation are crucial steps in capital budgeting. They help managers assess the potential outcomes and risks of investment projects. These techniques provide a comprehensive view of a project's viability, allowing for more informed decision-making.
, , and are key tools in this process. They enable managers to understand how different variables impact project outcomes and prepare for various future scenarios. This knowledge is essential for making sound investment choices and maximizing shareholder value.
Sensitivity Analysis for Project Variables
Assessing Variable Impact on Project Outcomes
Top images from around the web for Assessing Variable Impact on Project Outcomes
Sensitivity analysis - Praxis Framework View original
Is this image relevant?
7. Project Initiation – Project Management View original
Is this image relevant?
Sensitivity analysis - Praxis Framework View original
Is this image relevant?
7. Project Initiation – Project Management View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 2
Top images from around the web for Assessing Variable Impact on Project Outcomes
Sensitivity analysis - Praxis Framework View original
Is this image relevant?
7. Project Initiation – Project Management View original
Is this image relevant?
Sensitivity analysis - Praxis Framework View original
Is this image relevant?
7. Project Initiation – Project Management View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 2
Sensitivity analysis determines how changes in independent variables affect dependent variables under given assumptions
Process changes one input variable while holding others constant to observe impact on or
Identifies variables with most significant impact on project outcomes
Allows managers to focus on critical factors
Key project variables typically include
Sales volume
Selling price
Variable costs
Fixed costs
Initial investment
Visualization and Advanced Techniques
Results often presented in spider diagrams or tornado charts for visual representation
Advanced sensitivity analysis incorporates probabilistic distributions for input variables
Provides more comprehensive view of potential outcomes
Limitations of sensitivity analysis
Unable to consider interdependencies between variables
Assumes linear relationships between variables
Scenario Analysis for Project Evaluation
Analyzing Alternative Outcomes
Scenario analysis evaluates future events by considering alternative possible outcomes
Common scenarios in project evaluation
Best-case scenario
Worst-case scenario
Most likely or base-case scenario
Each scenario involves consistent set of assumptions about key project variables
Differs from sensitivity analysis which changes one variable at a time
Process typically involves
Defining scenarios
Estimating cash flows for each scenario
Calculating NPV or other financial metrics for each scenario
Comparing results
Probability-Weighted Analysis and Limitations
Probability-weighted scenario analysis incorporates likelihood of each scenario occurring
Calculates expected NPV or other financial metric
Helps understand range of potential outcomes and identify critical success factors
Limitations of scenario analysis
Potential for overlooking important scenarios
Subjective nature of scenario definition and probability assignment
Project Risk Assessment Techniques
Break-Even and Simulation Analysis
determines point where total revenue equals total costs
Indicates sales volume required for project profitability
Can be calculated in units or dollars
Extended to find time required to reach profitability ()
Simulation (Monte Carlo) models probability of outcomes with random variables
Defines range of possible values for each input variable
Randomly samples from these ranges
Runs numerous iterations to generate probability distribution of possible outcomes
Risk measures derived from simulation
Expected NPV
Standard deviation of NPV
Probability of negative NPV
Additional Risk Assessment Methods
for sequential decision-making under uncertainty
Real options analysis for valuing managerial flexibility
Choice of risk assessment technique depends on
Nature of project
Available data
Level of sophistication required in analysis
Capital Budgeting Decisions Based on Viability
Comprehensive Project Analysis
Integrates results from various evaluation techniques
NPV
IRR
Payback period
Sensitivity analysis
Scenario analysis
Risk assessment
Decision-makers consider both quantitative financial metrics and qualitative strategic factors
Risk-adjusted return balances expected return with associated risk
Uses techniques like risk-adjusted discount rates or certainty equivalents
Non-financial considerations in capital budgeting decisions
Strategic fit
Market positioning
Regulatory compliance
Environmental impact
Advanced Budgeting Techniques and Post-Audit
Capital rationing problem arises when company has more acceptable investment opportunities than resources
Requires prioritization of projects
Post-audit of capital budgeting decisions compares actual project outcomes with initial projections
Improves future decision-making processes
Advanced capital budgeting techniques incorporate real options thinking
Values managerial flexibility and strategic growth opportunities embedded in projects