📈Corporate Strategy and Valuation Unit 13 – Relative Valuation: Multiples & Comparables
Relative valuation compares a company's financial metrics to similar firms, using multiples like P/E and EV/EBITDA. This method assesses value by examining how a company stacks up against its peers, considering factors such as industry, size, and growth prospects.
While simple and widely used, relative valuation has limitations. Selecting truly comparable companies can be challenging, and multiples may be distorted by accounting differences or one-time events. It's best used alongside other valuation methods for a comprehensive analysis.
Relative valuation assesses a company's value by comparing its financial metrics to those of similar companies (comparables or comps)
Multiples are ratios used to compare a company's financial performance to its peers, industry averages, or historical values
Common multiples include price-to-earnings (P/E), enterprise value-to-EBITDA (EV/EBITDA), and price-to-sales (P/S)
Comparable companies are firms with similar characteristics, such as industry, size, growth prospects, and risk profile
Enterprise value (EV) represents the total value of a company, including both equity and debt
Calculated as market capitalization plus debt minus cash and cash equivalents
EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) is a measure of a company's operating performance
Normalized earnings adjust for one-time or non-recurring items to provide a more accurate representation of a company's ongoing financial performance
Types of Valuation Multiples
Equity multiples compare a company's stock price to its earnings, sales, or book value
Examples include P/E, price-to-book (P/B), and price-to-sales (P/S)
Enterprise value multiples compare a company's total value (equity and debt) to its earnings or revenue
Examples include EV/EBITDA, EV/sales, and EV/free cash flow (FCF)
Forward multiples use projected future earnings or revenue, while trailing multiples use historical data
Sector-specific multiples cater to the unique characteristics of certain industries (price-to-funds from operations for REITs)
Growth-adjusted multiples, such as the PEG ratio (P/E divided by growth rate), account for differences in growth rates among comparables
Selecting Comparable Companies
Identify companies in the same industry with similar business models, products, or services
Consider companies of similar size, as measured by market capitalization, revenue, or assets
Look for companies with comparable growth prospects, profitability, and risk profiles
Adjust for differences in financial leverage, as highly leveraged companies may have distorted multiples
Use a sufficient number of comparables to minimize the impact of outliers and ensure a representative sample
Aim for at least 5-10 comparable companies, depending on the industry and availability of data
Be aware of geographic differences, as companies in different regions may face distinct economic conditions and regulatory environments
Calculating and Interpreting Multiples
Calculate multiples using the appropriate financial metrics (stock price, earnings, revenue, etc.)
Example: P/E ratio = stock price / earnings per share (EPS)
Compare a company's multiples to those of its peers, industry averages, or historical values
Interpret higher multiples as a sign that the market expects stronger growth or profitability relative to comparables
Consider the dispersion of multiples within the peer group, as a wide range may indicate differences in company-specific factors
Use multiple valuation multiples to gain a more comprehensive understanding of a company's relative value
Analyze trends in multiples over time to identify potential changes in market sentiment or company performance
Advantages and Limitations
Advantages:
Relative valuation is simple, intuitive, and widely used in practice
Multiples are easy to calculate and interpret, even for non-financial professionals
Relative valuation incorporates market sentiment and expectations
Limitations:
Selecting truly comparable companies can be challenging, especially in diverse or rapidly evolving industries
Multiples can be distorted by differences in accounting policies, one-time events, or financial leverage
Relative valuation assumes that the market is efficiently pricing comparables, which may not always be the case
Multiples provide a snapshot of relative value but do not capture the intrinsic value of a company's cash flows and growth potential
Industry-Specific Considerations
Understand the key drivers of value in each industry, such as production capacity for oil and gas companies or assets under management for financial firms
Use industry-specific multiples that best capture the value drivers and performance metrics of the sector
Examples: price-to-funds from operations (P/FFO) for REITs, price-to-net asset value (P/NAV) for natural resource companies
Consider the impact of industry cycles and commodity prices on multiples for cyclical and resource-based sectors
Be aware of regulatory changes or industry disruptions that may affect the comparability of companies within a sector
Adjust for differences in business models or product mix among companies in the same industry
Practical Application and Case Studies
Use relative valuation to identify potential investment opportunities or acquisition targets
Look for companies trading at a discount to their peers or industry averages
Combine relative valuation with other valuation methods, such as discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis, to gain a more comprehensive view of a company's value
Monitor changes in multiples over time to assess shifts in market sentiment or company performance
Analyze case studies to understand how professionals apply relative valuation in real-world situations
Example: The valuation of a technology startup based on revenue multiples of comparable public companies
Use relative valuation to communicate value to stakeholders, such as investors or management teams
Common Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them
Relying on a single multiple or a small number of comparables
Use multiple valuation multiples and a diverse set of comparables to mitigate the impact of outliers or company-specific factors
Failing to adjust for differences in financial leverage or accounting policies
Normalize financial metrics and adjust for leverage to ensure comparability across companies
Ignoring industry-specific factors or market conditions
Consider the unique characteristics and value drivers of each industry, as well as the impact of macroeconomic factors on multiples
Overreliance on historical data without considering future expectations
Incorporate forward-looking multiples based on projected earnings or revenue to capture market expectations
Neglecting the limitations of relative valuation and using it as the sole basis for investment decisions
Use relative valuation in conjunction with other valuation methods and a thorough analysis of a company's fundamentals and growth prospects