9.1 Corporate Governance Structures and Mechanisms
6 min read•august 7, 2024
Corporate governance structures and mechanisms are essential for ensuring companies operate ethically and in shareholders' best interests. These systems include board composition, , and regulatory frameworks that shape how businesses are run and overseen.
From to prevention, these governance elements work together to promote transparency and accountability. Understanding these structures is crucial for grasping how modern corporations balance stakeholder interests and maintain integrity in their operations.
Board Structure and Composition
Roles and Responsibilities of the Board of Directors
Top images from around the web for Roles and Responsibilities of the Board of Directors
Stages and Types of Strategy | Principles of Management View original
is a group of individuals elected by shareholders to represent their interests and oversee the management of a company
Responsible for setting the overall strategy and direction of the company, making major decisions, and ensuring the company is operating ethically and legally
Hires and oversees the CEO and other senior executives, determines their compensation, and holds them accountable for the company's performance
Approves major financial decisions such as mergers and acquisitions, capital expenditures, and dividend payments
Importance of Audit Committees
Audit Committees are a subcommittee of the Board of Directors responsible for overseeing the company's financial reporting process and ensuring the accuracy and integrity of financial statements
Composed of with financial expertise who are not involved in the day-to-day management of the company
Reviews and approves the company's financial statements, selects and oversees the external auditor, and ensures compliance with accounting standards and regulations
Plays a critical role in preventing financial fraud and protecting the interests of shareholders (Enron scandal)
Role of Independent Directors
Independent Directors are board members who do not have any material relationship with the company or its management, such as being an employee, supplier, or major shareholder
Provide objective oversight and bring an outside perspective to the board, helping to prevent conflicts of interest and ensure decisions are made in the best interests of shareholders
Required by many corporate and stock exchange listing rules to have a majority of independent directors on the board and key committees (audit, compensation, nomination)
Help to improve the quality of board decision-making and increase investor confidence in the company's governance (WorldCom scandal)
Fiduciary Duty of Board Members
is a legal obligation of board members to act in the best interests of the company and its shareholders, rather than their own personal interests
Requires board members to exercise reasonable care and diligence in their decision-making, avoid conflicts of interest, and maintain confidentiality
Duty of Care requires board members to be informed and prudent in their decision-making, while Duty of Loyalty requires them to put the company's interests ahead of their own
Failure to fulfill fiduciary duties can result in legal liability for board members (Enron and WorldCom scandals)
Shareholder Rights and Activism
Importance of Shareholder Rights
Shareholder Rights are the legal rights and powers granted to shareholders as owners of a company, including the right to vote on important matters, elect directors, and receive dividends
Protect the interests of shareholders and ensure they have a say in how the company is governed and managed
Include the right to access information about the company's financial performance and governance practices, and to file shareholder resolutions to propose changes
Vary depending on the jurisdiction and the company's bylaws, but are generally stronger in countries with well-developed capital markets and legal systems (US, UK)
Role of Proxy Voting
is the process by which shareholders can vote on corporate matters without attending the annual general meeting in person
Allows shareholders to exercise their voting rights by appointing a proxy (another person or entity) to vote on their behalf
Commonly used for matters such as electing directors, approving , and voting on shareholder resolutions
Can be influenced by proxy advisory firms (Institutional Shareholder Services, Glass Lewis) that provide voting recommendations to institutional investors
Preventing Insider Trading
Insider Trading is the illegal practice of trading securities based on material, non-public information that is obtained through a relationship with the company
Prohibited by securities laws and regulations (Securities Exchange Act of 1934 in the US) to ensure fairness and integrity in the capital markets
Companies must have policies and procedures in place to prevent insider trading, such as restricting trading by insiders during certain periods and requiring pre-clearance of trades
Violations can result in civil and criminal penalties for individuals and companies (Martha Stewart, Raj Rajaratnam)
Understanding Agency Theory
is a framework for understanding the relationship between principals (shareholders) and agents (managers) in a company
Suggests that there is an inherent conflict of interest between shareholders and managers, as managers may pursue their own interests rather than those of shareholders
Gives rise to agency costs, such as monitoring costs (audits, board oversight) and bonding costs (executive compensation, contracts) to align the interests of managers with shareholders
Underlies many corporate governance mechanisms, such as independent boards, performance-based compensation, and shareholder activism, that aim to reduce agency costs and protect shareholder interests
Governance Regulations and Policies
Impact of Sarbanes-Oxley Act
(SOX) is a US federal law passed in 2002 in response to high-profile corporate scandals (Enron, WorldCom) that aims to improve corporate governance and financial reporting
Requires companies to have independent audit committees, CEO and CFO certification of financial statements, and internal controls over financial reporting
Imposes stricter penalties for corporate fraud and enhances the oversight role of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
Has had a significant impact on corporate governance practices and has been emulated in other countries, but has also been criticized for increasing compliance costs and burdens on companies
Importance of Corporate Bylaws
are a set of rules and procedures that govern the internal management and decision-making of a company
Typically cover matters such as the roles and responsibilities of the board and management, the conduct of meetings, and the rights and obligations of shareholders
Serve as a contract between the company and its shareholders and can be amended by a vote of the shareholders or the board
Provide a framework for the company's governance and help to ensure that decisions are made in a consistent and transparent manner
Role of Governance Codes
Governance Codes are voluntary or mandatory sets of principles and best practices for corporate governance that are developed by regulators, stock exchanges, or industry groups
Aim to promote transparency, accountability, and effective governance practices among companies and to protect the interests of shareholders and other stakeholders
Examples include the UK Corporate Governance Code, the OECD Principles of Corporate Governance, and the International Corporate Governance Network (ICGN) Global Governance Principles
Companies are often required to disclose their compliance with governance codes or explain any deviations (comply or explain approach)
Controversies around Executive Compensation
Executive Compensation refers to the pay and benefits received by senior executives of a company, including base salary, bonuses, stock options, and other perks
Has been a controversial issue in corporate governance due to concerns about excessive pay levels, lack of alignment with company performance, and inequity with other employees
Shareholder activists and regulators have pushed for greater transparency and accountability in executive compensation, such as say-on-pay votes and clawback provisions
Poorly designed compensation plans can create perverse incentives for executives to take excessive risks or engage in fraudulent behavior (Enron, WorldCom)