3.3 Roe v. Wade

Roe v. Wade, a landmark 1973 Supreme Court case, legalized abortion nationwide. It centered on Norma McCorvey, who challenged Texas's restrictive abortion laws under the alias "Jane Roe." The case addressed constitutional questions about abortion rights and government regulation.

The Court ruled 7-2 in favor of Roe, establishing a trimester-based framework for abortion regulation. This decision sparked ongoing controversy and debate, profoundly impacting American society, politics, and law. The ruling remained contentious until its recent overturning in 2022.

Background of Roe v. Wade

• Roe v. Wade was a landmark Supreme Court case decided in 1973 that legalized abortion nationwide
• The case centered around a woman named Norma McCorvey, known under the alias "Jane Roe," who challenged the constitutionality of Texas's restrictive abortion laws
• Roe v. Wade addressed the broader constitutional questions surrounding abortion rights and the role of the government in regulating this private decision

Texas abortion laws in 1970s

Top images from around the web for Texas abortion laws in 1970s

• 

  Abortion in the United States - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Abortion in the United States by state - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Women’s Rights | Boundless Political Science View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Abortion in the United States - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Abortion in the United States by state - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Texas abortion laws in 1970s

• 

  Abortion in the United States - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Abortion in the United States by state - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Women’s Rights | Boundless Political Science View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Abortion in the United States - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Abortion in the United States by state - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• In the early 1970s, Texas law prohibited abortion except in cases where the mother's life was in danger
• The law criminalized performing or attempting to perform an abortion, with penalties including imprisonment
• Many states had similar restrictive abortion laws at the time, often based on moral or religious grounds

Norma McCorvey's lawsuit

• Norma McCorvey, a Texas resident, sought an abortion in 1969 but was unable to obtain one legally due to the state's restrictions
• McCorvey filed a lawsuit against the Dallas County District Attorney, Henry Wade, challenging the constitutionality of Texas's abortion law
• The lawsuit, filed under the alias "Jane Roe" to protect McCorvey's privacy, argued that the Texas law violated a woman's constitutional right to privacy

Key constitutional issues

• Roe v. Wade raised several fundamental constitutional questions about the right to privacy, the state's interest in protecting potential life, and the balance between these competing interests
• The case required the Supreme Court to interpret the scope and application of the Constitution to the sensitive and controversial issue of abortion

Right to privacy

• The central argument in Roe v. Wade was that a woman's decision to have an abortion is protected by the constitutional right to privacy
• Although not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution, the right to privacy has been recognized by the Supreme Court as implicit in the liberty protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
• The Court had previously recognized the right to privacy in cases involving contraception (Griswold v. Connecticut) and interracial marriage (Loving v. Virginia)

Viability of fetus

• A key issue in Roe v. Wade was the concept of fetal viability, or the point at which a fetus can survive outside the womb
• The Court considered the competing interests of a woman's right to privacy and the state's interest in protecting potential life
• The viability of the fetus was seen as a crucial point at which the state's interest in protecting life becomes compelling enough to justify regulation of abortion

State's interest in protecting life

• Roe v. Wade recognized that the state has a legitimate interest in protecting potential human life
• However, the Court held that this interest must be balanced against a woman's constitutional right to privacy
• The Court found that the state's interest in protecting life becomes compelling at the point of fetal viability, and that prior to viability, the woman's right to privacy takes precedence

Supreme Court's decision

• In a 7-2 decision, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Roe, striking down Texas's abortion law as unconstitutional
• The Court held that a woman's right to privacy, encompassing the decision to have an abortion, is protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
• However, the Court also recognized that this right is not absolute and must be balanced against the state's interests in protecting health and potential life

Majority opinion by Blackmun

• The majority opinion in Roe v. Wade was written by Justice Harry Blackmun
• Blackmun's opinion carefully analyzed the history of abortion laws, the medical and scientific understanding of fetal development, and the constitutional principles at stake
• The opinion sought to balance the competing interests of women's privacy rights and the state's interest in protecting life

Trimester-based framework

• Roe v. Wade established a trimester-based framework for regulating abortion
• During the first trimester, the decision to have an abortion was left to the woman and her doctor, free from state interference
• In the second trimester, the state could regulate abortion only to protect the woman's health
• In the third trimester, after the point of fetal viability, the state could regulate or prohibit abortion to protect the potential life, except when necessary to preserve the life or health of the mother

Limitations on abortion regulations

• While recognizing the state's interest in protecting potential life, Roe v. Wade placed limits on the extent to which states could regulate abortion
• The Court held that any regulations on abortion must be narrowly tailored to serve a compelling state interest
• Regulations that placed an undue burden on a woman's right to have an abortion, such as requiring spousal consent or imposing waiting periods, were deemed unconstitutional

Dissenting opinions

• Two justices, William Rehnquist and Byron White, dissented from the majority opinion in Roe v. Wade
• The dissenting opinions argued that the Constitution does not protect a right to abortion and that the issue should be left to the states to decide through the democratic process

Rehnquist's dissent

• Justice Rehnquist's dissent argued that the majority's recognition of a constitutional right to abortion was not grounded in the language or history of the Constitution
• Rehnquist maintained that the issue of abortion should be decided by state legislatures, not the courts
• He criticized the trimester framework as a form of judicial legislation, arguing that the Court had overstepped its role by creating a detailed regulatory scheme

White's dissent

• Justice White's dissent also rejected the idea that the Constitution protects a right to abortion
• White argued that the majority had engaged in an illegitimate exercise of "raw judicial power" by invalidating the abortion laws of numerous states
• He maintained that the decision to legalize abortion should be made through the democratic process, with the people and their elected representatives determining the appropriate balance of interests

Impact of Roe v. Wade

• The Roe v. Wade decision had far-reaching consequences for American society, politics, and law
• The case established a constitutional right to abortion, invalidating restrictive abortion laws across the country
• Roe v. Wade sparked ongoing controversy and debate, with the issue of abortion remaining a highly polarizing and contentious topic in American public discourse

Legalization of abortion nationwide

• By striking down Texas's abortion law and establishing a constitutional right to abortion, Roe v. Wade effectively legalized abortion throughout the United States
• Women in all states now had access to legal abortion services, subject to the trimester-based regulations outlined in the decision
• The legalization of abortion had significant impacts on women's health, reproductive rights, and social and economic equality

Ongoing controversy and debate

• Despite the Supreme Court's ruling, the issue of abortion continued to be a source of intense controversy and debate
• Pro-life advocates, who believe that life begins at conception and that abortion is morally wrong, have sought to overturn Roe v. Wade and restrict access to abortion
• Pro-choice advocates, who support a woman's right to make decisions about her own body and reproductive health, have defended Roe v. Wade and worked to protect access to abortion services
• The debate over abortion has played a significant role in American politics, influencing elections, judicial appointments, and legislative battles at both the state and federal levels

Planned Parenthood v. Casey

• Planned Parenthood v. Casey was a significant Supreme Court case decided in 1992 that revisited the principles established in Roe v. Wade
• The case involved a challenge to several Pennsylvania abortion regulations, including informed consent requirements, a 24-hour waiting period, parental consent for minors, and spousal notification
• In a plurality opinion, the Court reaffirmed the central holding of Roe v. Wade, recognizing a constitutional right to abortion, but modified the legal framework for evaluating abortion restrictions

Modification of Roe framework

• The Casey decision modified the trimester-based framework established in Roe v. Wade
• Instead of the rigid trimester approach, the Court adopted a more flexible "undue burden" standard for evaluating abortion regulations
• Under this standard, a regulation is unconstitutional if it places a substantial obstacle in the path of a woman seeking an abortion before fetal viability

Undue burden standard

• The undue burden standard introduced in Casey sought to balance the state's interest in protecting potential life with a woman's right to have an abortion
• A regulation is considered an undue burden if its purpose or effect is to place substantial obstacles in the path of a woman seeking an abortion
• The Court upheld several of the Pennsylvania regulations (informed consent, 24-hour waiting period, parental consent) but struck down the spousal notification requirement as an undue burden

Challenges to Roe

• In the decades following Roe v. Wade, there have been numerous challenges to the decision and efforts to restrict access to abortion
• These challenges have taken various forms, including state-level legislation, judicial appointments, and constitutional amendments
• The goal of many of these challenges has been to overturn Roe v. Wade or to limit its scope and impact

State-level restrictions

• Many states have passed laws seeking to regulate or restrict access to abortion within the limits allowed by Roe and Casey
• These restrictions have included measures such as mandatory waiting periods, parental consent requirements, and limitations on late-term abortions
• Some states have also sought to impose targeted regulations on abortion providers (TRAP laws) that make it more difficult for clinics to operate
• Challenges to these state-level restrictions have often ended up before the Supreme Court, leading to a complex patchwork of abortion laws across the country

Appointment of conservative justices

• The appointment of conservative justices to the Supreme Court has been seen as a significant threat to Roe v. Wade
• Presidents opposed to abortion have sought to nominate justices who are likely to take a narrow view of the constitutional right to abortion or to overturn Roe altogether
• The confirmation of justices such as Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Brett Kavanaugh has shifted the ideological balance of the Court and raised concerns among pro-choice advocates about the future of abortion rights

Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health

• Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health was a landmark Supreme Court case decided in 2022 that directly challenged Roe v. Wade
• The case involved a Mississippi law that prohibited most abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy, well before the point of fetal viability established in Roe
• In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court upheld the Mississippi law and overturned Roe v. Wade, ending the constitutional right to abortion

Mississippi's 15-week abortion ban

• The Mississippi law at the center of Dobbs prohibited most abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy, with exceptions for medical emergencies and severe fetal abnormalities
• The law was a direct challenge to the viability standard established in Roe, which protected the right to abortion until around 24 weeks of pregnancy
• Lower courts had blocked the law, finding it unconstitutional under Roe and Casey, but Mississippi appealed to the Supreme Court

Overturning of Roe v. Wade

• In the Dobbs decision, the Supreme Court's conservative majority held that the Constitution does not protect a right to abortion
• The Court overturned Roe v. Wade and Casey, stating that the issue of abortion should be left to the states to regulate through the democratic process
• The decision marked a significant shift in American abortion law, ending nearly 50 years of federal constitutional protection for abortion rights

Post-Roe landscape

• The overturning of Roe v. Wade in the Dobbs decision has created a new legal landscape for abortion in the United States
• Without the constitutional protection of Roe, the legality and availability of abortion now varies widely from state to state
• The post-Roe era has been characterized by uncertainty, ongoing legal battles, and a patchwork of state laws and regulations

State-by-state variations in laws

• In the absence of a federal constitutional right to abortion, states are now free to regulate or prohibit abortion as they see fit
• Some states have moved to protect abortion rights through legislation or state constitutional amendments
• Other states have enacted strict abortion bans or restrictions, with some laws taking effect immediately after the Dobbs decision
• The result is a complex and rapidly evolving landscape, with women's access to abortion services dependent on their state of residence

Ongoing legal battles and uncertainty

• The overturning of Roe has not ended legal battles over abortion, but rather shifted them to the state level
• Challenges to state abortion laws, both those protecting and restricting access, are likely to continue in state and federal courts
• The uncertainty surrounding abortion rights has also raised questions about access to medication abortion, interstate travel for abortion services, and the potential criminalization of abortion providers and patients
• The long-term impacts of the Dobbs decision on women's health, reproductive rights, and American society as a whole remain to be seen as the post-Roe era unfolds.