1.3 Historical Development of Criminal Justice in the United States

The U.S. criminal justice system has evolved dramatically since colonial times. From public shaming to modern policing, it reflects changing social values and legal principles. This evolution shows how our approach to crime and punishment has shifted over time.

Key developments include the rise of professional police forces, the creation of penitentiaries, and landmark court cases. These changes shaped how we handle law enforcement, incarceration, and legal rights today. Understanding this history helps explain our current system's strengths and challenges.

Evolution of the Criminal Justice System

Colonial to Post-Revolutionary Period

Top images from around the web for Colonial to Post-Revolutionary Period

• 

  File:Diagram showing system of common law courts in England and Wales before the Judicature Acts ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  File:Diagram showing system of common law courts in England and Wales before the Judicature Acts ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 1

Top images from around the web for Colonial to Post-Revolutionary Period

• 

  File:Diagram showing system of common law courts in England and Wales before the Judicature Acts ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  File:Diagram showing system of common law courts in England and Wales before the Judicature Acts ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 1

• Colonial criminal justice system drew heavily from English common law
  • Punishments focused on public shame and physical retribution (stocks, pillory, whipping)
• Post-Revolutionary period shifted towards formalized legal codes
  • Establishment of penitentiaries for punishment and rehabilitation (Eastern State Penitentiary)
• Influenced by Enlightenment ideals of justice and human rights

19th Century Developments

• Professional police forces emerged (New York City Police Department, 1845)
• Prison system expanded with new models of incarceration
  • Auburn model emphasized silent labor and strict discipline
  • Pennsylvania model focused on solitary confinement and moral reform
• Shift towards more organized and systematic approach to law enforcement

Progressive Era to Present

• Progressive Era (late 19th to early 20th century) brought rehabilitative focus
  • Introduction of juvenile courts (Chicago, 1899)
  • Implementation of probation and parole systems
• Mid-20th century saw rise of "tough on crime" policies
  • Increased incarceration rates and mandatory minimum sentences (Rockefeller Drug Laws)
• Recent trends emphasize community-oriented approaches
  • Community policing initiatives (foot patrols, neighborhood watch programs)
  • Problem-oriented policing to address root causes of crime
  • Evidence-based practices in corrections and rehabilitation (cognitive-behavioral therapy programs)

Historical Influences on Criminal Justice

Constitutional Foundations and Early Developments

• U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights established fundamental legal principles
  • Due process rights enshrined in Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments
  • Protection against unreasonable searches and seizures (Fourth Amendment)
• Creation of first municipal police force in Boston (1838)
  • Marked beginning of modern American policing
  • Served as model for other cities across the nation
• Establishment of Federal Bureau of Investigation (1908)
  • Expanded federal law enforcement capabilities
  • Initially focused on interstate crime and corruption

Prohibition and Civil Rights Era

• Prohibition era (1920-1933) impacted crime and law enforcement
  • Growth of organized crime syndicates (Al Capone's Chicago Outfit)
  • Expansion of federal law enforcement efforts to combat bootlegging
• Civil Rights Movement (1950s-1960s) highlighted systemic issues
  • Exposed racial discrimination in criminal justice system
  • Led to reforms in policing practices and anti-discrimination laws
  • Resulted in landmark legislation (Civil Rights Act of 1964, Voting Rights Act of 1965)

Modern Era Challenges

• War on Drugs (1970s-present) reshaped criminal justice landscape
  • Significant changes to drug laws and enforcement practices
  • Contributed to mass incarceration, particularly affecting minority communities
• September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks altered law enforcement priorities
  • Creation of Department of Homeland Security (2002)
  • Increased focus on counterterrorism in domestic and international operations
  • Enhanced information sharing between agencies (Joint Terrorism Task Forces)

Social, Political, and Economic Factors

Urbanization and Economic Influences

• 19th century urbanization and industrialization created new crime patterns
  • Rise of organized crime in urban centers (Five Points Gang in New York)
  • Emergence of labor-related crimes and disputes
• Economic depressions impacted crime rates and law enforcement priorities
  • Great Depression (1930s) saw increase in property crimes
  • Bonnie and Clyde era bank robberies captured public attention

Political Ideologies and Social Movements

• Conservative and liberal ideologies shaped criminal justice policies
  • Conservative "law and order" approach emphasized punitive measures
  • Liberal reforms focused on rehabilitation and addressing root causes of crime
• Social movements influenced legal reforms and law enforcement practices
  • Civil rights movement led to anti-discrimination laws in policing
  • Women's rights movement addressed domestic violence and sexual assault issues
  • LGBTQ+ rights movement pushed for hate crime legislation and non-discrimination policies

Technological and Global Influences

• Technological advancements transformed criminal justice practices
  • DNA profiling revolutionized forensic science (first used in criminal case in 1986)
  • Digital surveillance capabilities expanded (CCTV, facial recognition)
• Media portrayal of crime shaped public perception and policy
  • True crime documentaries influenced public opinion on high-profile cases
  • 24-hour news cycle amplified focus on violent crime
• Globalization led to emergence of transnational crime
  • International drug trafficking networks (Colombian cartels)
  • Cybercrime spanning multiple jurisdictions
  • Increased need for international law enforcement cooperation (INTERPOL)

Landmark Court Cases and Their Impact

Foundational Cases

• Marbury v. Madison (1803) established judicial review
  • Allowed courts to interpret Constitution and strike down unconstitutional laws
  • Set precedent for Supreme Court's role in shaping criminal justice policy
• Miranda v. Arizona (1966) created "Miranda rights"
  • Required law enforcement to inform suspects of rights before custodial interrogation
  • Dramatically changed police interrogation procedures nationwide

Fourth and Sixth Amendment Cases

• Mapp v. Ohio (1961) applied exclusionary rule to state courts
  • Prohibited use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials
  • Significantly impacted police search and seizure practices
• Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) established right to counsel
  • Guaranteed legal representation for defendants unable to afford attorneys in state criminal cases
  • Led to creation of public defender systems across the country
• Terry v. Ohio (1968) defined parameters of "stop and frisk"
  • Balanced law enforcement needs with individual privacy rights
  • Allowed brief detentions based on reasonable suspicion

Capital Punishment and Sentencing Cases

• Furman v. Georgia (1972) temporarily halted capital punishment
  • Found existing death penalty statutes unconstitutional
  • Led to moratorium on executions and revision of state death penalty laws
• Gregg v. Georgia (1976) reinstated capital punishment
  • Approved new "guided discretion" statutes for imposing death penalty
  • Shaped modern application of capital punishment in United States
• United States v. Booker (2005) altered federal sentencing guidelines
  • Made Federal Sentencing Guidelines advisory rather than mandatory
  • Gave judges more discretion in sentencing decisions
  • Aimed to address disparities in sentencing practices