3.2 Neoclassical Criminology and Rational Choice Theory

Neoclassical Criminology builds on Classical ideas while recognizing social and psychological factors in criminal behavior. It maintains that people make rational choices about crime, weighing costs and benefits, but acknowledges individual differences and circumstances that influence decision-making.

Rational Choice Theory, a key component, sees crime as a deliberate choice based on perceived rewards and risks. While it offers practical insights for prevention and deterrence, critics argue it oversimplifies complex motivations and ignores broader societal influences on criminal behavior.

Neoclassical Criminology

Main tenets of Neoclassical Criminology

Top images from around the web for Main tenets of Neoclassical Criminology

• 

  Lawrence Kohlberg's stages of moral development - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  5.5. Neoclassical – SOU-CCJ230 Introduction to the American Criminal Justice System View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Contemporary Psychology | Introduction to Psychology View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Lawrence Kohlberg's stages of moral development - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  5.5. Neoclassical – SOU-CCJ230 Introduction to the American Criminal Justice System View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Main tenets of Neoclassical Criminology

• 

  Lawrence Kohlberg's stages of moral development - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  5.5. Neoclassical – SOU-CCJ230 Introduction to the American Criminal Justice System View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Contemporary Psychology | Introduction to Psychology View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Lawrence Kohlberg's stages of moral development - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  5.5. Neoclassical – SOU-CCJ230 Introduction to the American Criminal Justice System View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Developed in response to perceived limitations of Classical Criminology (Beccaria, Bentham)
• Retains core principles of Classical School emphasizing free will and individual responsibility for criminal actions
• Maintains belief that punishment deters crime by increasing perceived costs of offending
• Incorporates social and environmental factors (poverty, peer influence) that shape criminal behavior
• Recognizes psychological factors (personality traits, mental disorders) influencing individual decision-making
• Acknowledges individual differences in susceptibility to criminal temptations and deterrence
• Advocates for punishment proportional to severity of crime committed (retribution, just deserts)
• Supports individualized sentencing based on offender's unique circumstances and characteristics (age, criminal history)

Rational Choice Theory vs Classical School

• Rational Choice Theory extends Classical School's emphasis on free will and individual responsibility for crime
• Presumes offenders make rational decisions by weighing potential rewards (financial gain, thrills) against risks (arrest, imprisonment)
• Maintains crime is a deliberate choice and offenders are accountable for their actions
• Incorporates concept of bounded rationality recognizing decision-making is constrained by limited information, cognitive abilities, and time pressures
• Stresses importance of situational factors (target attractiveness, guardianship) in creating criminal opportunities and influencing offender decision-making
• Differs from Classical School by acknowledging individual and contextual factors beyond simple cost-benefit analysis

Decision-making in criminal behavior

• Rational Choice Theory asserts offenders make decisions based on perceived costs and benefits of crime
• Perceived benefits may include financial gains (robbery, fraud), excitement (joyriding), or enhanced status (gang membership)
• Perceived costs may involve risk of arrest and legal sanctions, social stigma and damaged relationships, or feelings of guilt and shame
• Offenders rationally calculate expected utility of crime, comparing anticipated rewards to potential consequences
• Criminal decisions influenced by perceived likelihood of success (easy target, low security), severity and certainty of punishment (lenient laws, ineffective policing), and availability of legitimate alternatives (employment, education)
• Rational choice approach emphasizes offenders as active decision-makers, not passive victims of circumstance

Strengths and limitations of Rational Choice Theory

• Strengths:
  • Offers clear and concise explanation for criminal behavior based on rational decision-making
  • Emphasizes individual agency and responsibility, avoiding deterministic excuses for crime
  • Highlights situational crime prevention strategies aimed at increasing costs and reducing benefits of offending (target hardening, increased surveillance)
  • Provides practical guidance for deterrence-based policies (certain, swift, and severe punishment)
• Limitations:
  • Assumes criminal behavior always stems from rational deliberation, ignoring irrational influences of emotions (anger, jealousy), impulses (opportunistic theft), or substance abuse
  • Neglects social and structural factors (inequality, discrimination) that shape offending beyond individual choice
  • Struggles to explain crimes by individuals with mental illnesses or cognitive impairments that distort rational decision-making
  • Less applicable to crimes of passion (domestic violence) or expressive crimes (vandalism) not motivated by instrumental concerns
  • Overemphasizes rational calculation, as many offenders act with bounded rationality or imperfect information about risks and rewards