4.1 Biological Theories of Criminal Behavior

Biological theories of crime have evolved from early ideas about physical traits to modern genetic and neurological research. These theories explore how our biology might influence criminal behavior, looking at factors like brain structure and neurotransmitter levels.

While biological explanations offer scientific insights, they have limitations. Critics argue they oversimplify complex behaviors and raise ethical concerns about profiling and discrimination. Balancing biological factors with social influences is key to understanding crime.

Historical Development and Key Proponents of Biological Theories

Development of biological crime theories

Top images from around the web for Development of biological crime theories

• 

  Frontiers | Brain Organoids as Model Systems for Genetic Neurodevelopmental Disorders View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Cesare Lombroso - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  5.7. Biological and Psychological Positivism – SOU-CCJ230 Introduction to the American Criminal ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Brain Organoids as Model Systems for Genetic Neurodevelopmental Disorders View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Cesare Lombroso - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Development of biological crime theories

• 

  Frontiers | Brain Organoids as Model Systems for Genetic Neurodevelopmental Disorders View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Cesare Lombroso - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  5.7. Biological and Psychological Positivism – SOU-CCJ230 Introduction to the American Criminal ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Brain Organoids as Model Systems for Genetic Neurodevelopmental Disorders View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Cesare Lombroso - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Atavism and criminal anthropology pioneered by Cesare Lombroso (1835-1909)
  • Believed criminals were born with primitive traits that were throwbacks to earlier evolutionary stages
  • Identified physical characteristics he believed were associated with criminals (large jaws, high cheekbones, abnormal teeth)
• Somatotypes and body types theories developed by Ernest Kretschmer (1888-1964) and William Sheldon (1898-1977)
  • Linked specific body types (endomorphs, mesomorphs, ectomorphs) to personality traits and criminal behavior
  • Argued that mesomorphs (muscular, athletic) were more prone to aggression and crime
• Genetics and twin studies conducted by Johannes Lange (1891-1938) and Friedrich Stumpfl (1902-1986)
  • Studied criminal behavior in twins to investigate the role of genetic influences
  • Found higher concordance rates for criminal behavior in identical twins compared to fraternal twins
• Evolutionary psychology perspective emerged more recently
  • Argues that some criminal behaviors (theft, violence) may have evolved as adaptive strategies in ancestral environments
  • Suggests that these behaviors persist because they conferred reproductive advantages in the past

Biological Factors in Criminal Behavior

Genetics and neurobiology in crime

• Genetics play a role in criminal behavior according to familial aggregation studies
  • Specific genes associated with aggression and impulsivity have been identified (MAOA, 5-HTTLPR)
  • MAOA gene regulates the breakdown of neurotransmitters like serotonin and dopamine
  • Low-activity MAOA variant linked to increased risk of antisocial behavior in males exposed to childhood maltreatment
• Brain structure abnormalities in regions like the prefrontal cortex, amygdala, and hippocampus are linked to criminal behavior
  • Reduced gray matter volume and impaired connectivity in these regions are common findings
  • Prefrontal cortex involved in decision-making, impulse control, and moral reasoning
  • Amygdala processes emotions like fear and aggression; hippocampus involved in learning and memory
• Neurochemistry imbalances in neurotransmitters such as serotonin, dopamine, and norepinephrine are associated with criminal behavior
  • Low serotonin levels linked to impulsivity, aggression, and violent behavior
  • High dopamine levels associated with sensation-seeking, risk-taking, and reward-driven behavior
  • Norepinephrine involved in the body's stress response and arousal regulation

Evaluating Biological Explanations

Strengths vs limitations of biological explanations

• Strengths of biological explanations for criminal behavior:
  • Provides a scientific basis grounded in genetics, neuroscience, and evolutionary psychology
  • Identifies potential risk factors (gene variants, brain abnormalities) that could be targets for intervention and prevention
  • Integrates findings from multiple disciplines to offer a more comprehensive understanding
• Limitations of biological explanations for criminal behavior:
  • Biological factors alone do not determine criminal behavior; social and environmental influences (poverty, abuse, peer influence) play a significant role
  • Potential for stigmatization and labeling of individuals based on their biological characteristics
  • Difficulty establishing causal relationships given the complex interplay of factors; correlations do not equal causation
  • Overlooks the role of personal agency, choice, and responsibility in shaping behavior

Ethical Implications

Ethics of biological crime prediction

• Potential for discrimination and stereotyping based on biological characteristics
  • Could lead to profiling and biased treatment in the criminal justice system
  • May reinforce prejudiced attitudes towards certain groups (racial minorities, mental illness)
• Risk of biological explanations being used to justify punitive measures or neglect rehabilitation
  • Viewing criminals as "born bad" or "defective" could undermine efforts to address root causes and promote change
  • May lead to harsher sentencing or indefinite detention based on perceived risk rather than actual guilt
• Privacy concerns related to the collection and use of sensitive genetic and neurological data
  • Potential for misuse or unauthorized access to personal information
  • Questions about who should have access and for what purposes (employers, insurers, government)
• Importance of considering the complex interplay between biological, psychological, and social factors
  • Recognizing that crime is a product of multiple intersecting influences, not just biology
  • Avoiding reductionist or deterministic explanations that neglect individual differences and contextual factors
• Need for caution in applying group-level findings to predict individual behavior
  • Population-level trends and averages do not necessarily apply to specific individuals
  • Risk of false positives and negatives when using biological markers to assess risk
• Balancing public safety concerns with respect for individual rights and freedoms
  • Ensuring that any use of biological information is evidence-based, transparent, and subject to ethical oversight
  • Protecting against coercive or invasive interventions based solely on biological risk factors