7.2 Sacred Sites and Religious Freedom

Native Americans view sacred sites as crucial for their spiritual practices and cultural identity. These places, often natural features or ancient structures, are deeply connected to tribal traditions and beliefs. Protecting them is vital for preserving Native American heritage.

Laws like the American Indian Religious Freedom Act aim to safeguard sacred sites, but conflicts with land management and development persist. Court cases have shaped how these sites are protected, balancing Native American rights with other interests. It's an ongoing challenge to preserve these important places.

Sacred sites for Native American communities

Definition and characteristics of sacred sites

Top images from around the web for Definition and characteristics of sacred sites

• 

  Spiro Mounds - Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Bears Ears National Monument - House on Fire | Bears Ears Na… | Flickr View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Bears Ears National Monument - Indian Creek | Bears Ears Nat… | Flickr View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Spiro Mounds - Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Bears Ears National Monument - House on Fire | Bears Ears Na… | Flickr View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Definition and characteristics of sacred sites

• 

  Spiro Mounds - Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Bears Ears National Monument - House on Fire | Bears Ears Na… | Flickr View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Bears Ears National Monument - Indian Creek | Bears Ears Nat… | Flickr View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Spiro Mounds - Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Bears Ears National Monument - House on Fire | Bears Ears Na… | Flickr View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Sacred sites represent locations of spiritual, cultural, and historical importance to Native American tribes
• Sites often tied to creation stories, ceremonial practices, or ancestral connections
• Include natural features (mountains, rivers, caves) and human-made structures (burial grounds, rock art, ceremonial structures)
• Concept of sacredness extends beyond physical boundaries, encompassing entire landscapes and ecosystems
• Many sacred sites considered living entities with their own spirit and agency
• Require respect and protection according to traditional tribal laws and customs

Significance and importance to Native American communities

• Integral to Native American religious and cultural practices
• Serve as places for prayer, healing, vision quests, and transmission of traditional knowledge
• Crucial for maintaining cultural continuity, tribal identity, and spiritual well-being
• Access to and protection of sacred sites viewed as fundamental rights by Native American tribes
• Essential for the free exercise of Native American religions and cultural practices
• Preservation supports ongoing connection to ancestral traditions and beliefs
• Often central to tribal origin stories and cosmologies

Legal protection of sacred sites

Constitutional and federal legislation

• First Amendment's Free Exercise Clause provides constitutional protection for Native American religious practices
• American Indian Religious Freedom Act (AIRFA) of 1978 established federal policy to protect Native American religious cultural rights
• Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) of 1990 protects cultural items found at sacred sites
• Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) of 1993 requires government to demonstrate compelling interest before burdening religious exercise
• National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) protects sacred sites qualifying as historic properties
  • Requires federal agencies to consider effects of actions on these sites
  • Provides framework for consultation with tribes on preservation efforts

Executive orders and tribal consultation

• Executive Order 13007 (1996) directs federal agencies to accommodate Native American access to sacred sites on federal lands
  • Mandates protection and preservation of physical integrity of sacred sites
  • Requires maintaining confidentiality of sacred site locations when appropriate
• Tribal consultation requirements established through various laws and executive orders
  • Mandate federal agencies engage with tribes in decision-making processes affecting sacred sites
  • Aim to incorporate tribal perspectives and traditional knowledge in land management decisions
  • Promote government-to-government relationships between tribes and federal agencies

Balancing sacred site protection vs competing interests

Conflicts with land management and economic development

• Many sacred sites located on public lands, creating conflicts with federal land management policies
• Economic development interests (resource extraction, infrastructure projects) often compete with preservation
• Concept of sacred space in Native American religions clashes with Western notions of land ownership and use
  • Leads to legal and cultural misunderstandings
  • Challenges traditional property rights frameworks
• Maintaining confidentiality of sacred site locations conflicts with public land management practices
  • Transparency requirements can expose sensitive information
  • Balancing public access with protection of sacred spaces

Challenges in demonstrating and protecting religious significance

• Burden of proof in demonstrating religious significance often falls on Native American tribes
  • Challenging due to oral nature of many traditions
  • Difficulty in translating spiritual concepts into legal frameworks
• Diversity of Native American religious practices complicates creation of uniform protection policies
• Site-specific nature of many sacred places requires tailored approaches to preservation
• Balancing tribal access to sacred sites with environmental protection and public safety concerns
  • Addressing increased visitation and potential degradation of natural resources
  • Implementing measures to protect both cultural and ecological values of sacred landscapes

Sacred site disputes and legal outcomes

Landmark court decisions

• Lyng v. Northwest Indian Cemetery Protective Association (1988) established government's use of its land, even if destroying central religious practice, does not violate Free Exercise Clause
• Bear Lodge Multiple Use Association v. Babbitt (1999) upheld National Park Service's right to implement voluntary climbing ban at Devils Tower
  • Accommodated Native American religious practices
  • Balanced recreational use with cultural preservation
• Navajo Nation v. U.S. Forest Service (2008) ruled use of recycled wastewater for snowmaking on sacred mountain did not violate RFRA
  • Court found no substantial burden on religious exercise
  • Highlighted challenges in proving religious impact under RFRA

Recent cases and ongoing disputes

• Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ongoing) highlights intersection of sacred site protection, environmental concerns, and energy development
  • Dakota Access Pipeline dispute
  • Raises questions about adequate tribal consultation and environmental impact assessment
• Wyoming Sawmills v. U.S. Forest Service (2004) upheld Forest Service's decision to protect sacred Medicine Wheel National Historic Landmark
  • Restricted nearby logging activities
  • Demonstrated successful balancing of economic interests with sacred site preservation
• Slockish v. U.S. Federal Highway Administration (2018) addressed destruction of sacred sites during highway expansion
  • Explored limits of legal remedies available to tribes
  • Highlighted need for improved consultation processes in infrastructure projects
• Snoqualmie Indian Tribe v. FERC (2009) examined balance between hydroelectric power generation and protection of Snoqualmie Falls
  • Demonstrated complexities of competing interests in sacred site disputes
  • Resulted in compromise between energy production and cultural preservation