3.3 LGBTQ+ representation

LGBTQ+ representation on TV has come a long way. From early stereotypes and censorship to more authentic portrayals, the evolution reflects changing societal attitudes. Understanding this history is key to analyzing progress and remaining challenges.

The shift from queer-coded characters to openly LGBTQ+ roles marks a significant change in TV's approach. This transition highlights the importance of authentic representation and the ongoing struggle to balance visibility with mainstream appeal.

History of LGBTQ+ representation

• LGBTQ+ representation in television has evolved significantly over the past several decades, from early stereotypes and censorship to more authentic and diverse portrayals
• Understanding the historical context of LGBTQ+ representation is crucial for analyzing how far the medium has come and the challenges that remain
• Key moments and eras in LGBTQ+ TV history highlight the interplay between societal attitudes, activism, and on-screen representation

Early stereotypes and tropes

Top images from around the web for Early stereotypes and tropes

• 

  Queer I: Seeing queerly | Pursuit by The University of Melbourne View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Breaking gender stereotypes. Early | Pursuit by The University of Melbourne View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Television shows, gay characters and the origin of younger Americans’ support for LGBTQ rights ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Queer I: Seeing queerly | Pursuit by The University of Melbourne View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Breaking gender stereotypes. Early | Pursuit by The University of Melbourne View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Early stereotypes and tropes

• 

  Queer I: Seeing queerly | Pursuit by The University of Melbourne View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Breaking gender stereotypes. Early | Pursuit by The University of Melbourne View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Television shows, gay characters and the origin of younger Americans’ support for LGBTQ rights ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Queer I: Seeing queerly | Pursuit by The University of Melbourne View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Breaking gender stereotypes. Early | Pursuit by The University of Melbourne View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Early television depictions of LGBTQ+ characters relied heavily on stereotypes and offensive tropes (sissy, predatory lesbian)
• These stereotypes were often used for comic relief or as villains, reinforcing negative societal attitudes towards LGBTQ+ people
• Queer-coded characters appeared, but their identities were implied rather than explicitly stated

Censorship and moral panic

• Strict censorship codes (Hays Code) prohibited any explicit references to homosexuality, considering it a taboo subject
• Moral panic around "sexual perversion" led to further restrictions on LGBTQ+ content
• Queer characters and themes had to be heavily coded or completely absent from television

AIDS crisis impact

• The AIDS crisis of the 1980s had a profound impact on LGBTQ+ representation in television
• News coverage and public perception often stigmatized the LGBTQ+ community, particularly gay men
• Some shows (An Early Frost) began addressing the AIDS crisis, marking a shift towards more direct representation

Slow progress in 1990s

• The 1990s saw gradual progress in LGBTQ+ representation, with more shows featuring queer secondary characters (Roseanne, Friends)
• Sitcoms began exploring LGBTQ+ themes and characters, though often in limited or problematic ways
• Groundbreaking shows like Ellen and Will & Grace featured lead characters who were openly gay, paving the way for future representation

Queer-coded vs openly LGBTQ+ characters

• Queer-coding and explicit representation have been two distinct approaches to LGBTQ+ inclusion in television, each with its own challenges and implications
• Analyzing the differences between queer-coded and openly LGBTQ+ characters reveals the evolving strategies for representing queer identities on screen
• The shift towards more direct representation marks a significant change in how television approaches LGBTQ+ stories and characters

Subtext and queer-coding

• Queer-coding involves characters who are implied to be LGBTQ+ through subtext, stereotypes, or coded behaviors without explicitly stating their identity
• This approach allowed for LGBTQ+ representation during eras of censorship and restrictions (Hays Code era)
• Examples of queer-coded characters include Smithers (The Simpsons), Ursula (The Little Mermaid), and Xena and Gabrielle (Xena: Warrior Princess)

First LGBTQ+ main characters

• The first openly LGBTQ+ main characters marked a significant milestone in television representation
• Ellen Morgan (Ellen) became the first lead character to come out as gay in 1997, followed by Will Truman (Will & Grace) in 1998
• These characters faced both praise for visibility and criticism for their portrayal and the broader narrative implications (Ellen's cancellation)

Challenges of explicit representation

• Explicit LGBTQ+ representation has faced numerous challenges, including stereotyping, tokenism, and negative audience reactions
• Shows with openly queer characters have faced boycotts, advertiser pullouts, and cancellations (Ellen, Pose)
• Balancing authentic representation with mainstream appeal remains an ongoing challenge for creators and networks

Importance of authenticity

• Authentic representation involves LGBTQ+ characters and stories that are complex, nuanced, and reflective of real-life experiences
• Authenticity requires input from LGBTQ+ creators, consultants, and actors who can bring their lived experiences to the roles
• Shows like Pose, Queer as Folk, and The L Word have been praised for their authentic portrayal of LGBTQ+ communities and issues

Intersectionality in LGBTQ+ representation

• Intersectionality acknowledges the interconnected nature of social categorizations such as race, class, and gender identity as they apply to an individual or group
• LGBTQ+ representation in television has often lacked diversity, focusing primarily on white, cisgender, and middle-class characters
• Examining the intersections of LGBTQ+ identity with other marginalized identities is crucial for creating more inclusive and authentic representation

LGBTQ+ people of color

• LGBTQ+ characters of color have been underrepresented in television, often facing stereotypes or limited storylines
• Shows like Noah's Arc, Pose, and Vida have centered on LGBTQ+ people of color, exploring the unique challenges and experiences they face
• Intersectional representation requires addressing the specific oppression and marginalization faced by LGBTQ+ people of color

Transgender and non-binary characters

• Transgender and non-binary characters have been largely absent or misrepresented in television history
• Early depictions often relied on stereotypes (deceptive, mentally ill) or casting cisgender actors in trans roles
• Shows like Pose, Transparent, and Orange Is the New Black have featured more authentic and diverse transgender characters

Bisexual erasure and biphobia

• Bisexual characters have been subject to erasure, stereotyping, and biphobia in television representation
• Bisexuality is often portrayed as a phase, a source of confusion, or a plot device rather than a valid identity
• Limited and stereotypical representation contributes to the marginalization and invisibility of bisexual individuals

Class and socioeconomic diversity

• LGBTQ+ representation in television has often focused on middle and upper-class characters, neglecting the experiences of working-class and low-income queer individuals
• Class and socioeconomic status intersect with LGBTQ+ identity, shaping access to resources, support systems, and opportunities
• Shows like Shameless and Vida have explored the experiences of working-class LGBTQ+ characters and communities

Genres and LGBTQ+ stories

• Different television genres have approached LGBTQ+ representation in distinct ways, shaping the kinds of stories and characters that are depicted
• Examining how genres like sitcoms, dramas, reality TV, and sci-fi/fantasy have incorporated LGBTQ+ themes and characters reveals the evolving landscape of queer representation
• Each genre offers unique opportunities and challenges for exploring LGBTQ+ experiences and pushing the boundaries of representation

Sitcoms and family dynamics

• Sitcoms have been a significant space for LGBTQ+ representation, often focusing on family dynamics and acceptance
• Shows like Will & Grace, Modern Family, and One Day at a Time have featured LGBTQ+ characters navigating family relationships and coming out
• Sitcoms have the potential to normalize LGBTQ+ identities and relationships through humor and relatable storylines

Drama and coming out narratives

• Drama series have often centered on LGBTQ+ characters' coming out stories and the subsequent fallout
• Shows like Queer as Folk, The L Word, and Pose have explored the dramatic and emotional aspects of LGBTQ+ experiences
• Coming out narratives can provide visibility and relatability, but they also risk overemphasizing a single aspect of LGBTQ+ identity

Reality TV and visibility

• Reality television has provided a platform for LGBTQ+ visibility, featuring queer contestants and personalities
• Shows like RuPaul's Drag Race, Queer Eye, and Are You the One? have celebrated LGBTQ+ identities and challenged stereotypes
• Reality TV representation can increase visibility but also faces criticism for sensationalism and lack of depth

Sci-fi/fantasy and queer worldbuilding

• Science fiction and fantasy genres have the unique potential to imagine worlds where LGBTQ+ identities are normalized or explored in new ways
• Shows like Steven Universe, Sense8, and The Umbrella Academy have incorporated queer characters and themes into their worldbuilding
• Sci-fi and fantasy can challenge heteronormative assumptions and explore LGBTQ+ experiences through allegory and metaphor

Tropes and stereotypes

• LGBTQ+ characters in television have often been subjected to limiting and harmful tropes and stereotypes
• Examining common tropes and stereotypes reveals the ways in which LGBTQ+ representation has been constrained and marginalized
• Challenging and subverting these tropes is crucial for creating more authentic and diverse LGBTQ+ representation

Gay best friend trope

• The gay best friend trope depicts a gay male character whose primary role is to provide support and advice to a straight female protagonist
• This trope often relies on stereotypes of gay men as fashionable, witty, and emotionally available
• Examples include Stanford Blatch (Sex and the City), Marc St. James (Ugly Betty), and Jack McFarland (Will & Grace)

Bury your gays trope

• The "bury your gays" trope involves the disproportionate death of LGBTQ+ characters, particularly in dramatic series
• This trope perpetuates the idea that LGBTQ+ characters are disposable or tragic figures
• Notable examples include Tara Maclay (Buffy the Vampire Slayer), Lexa (The 100), and Poussey Washington (Orange Is the New Black)

Predatory lesbian trope

• The predatory lesbian trope portrays lesbian and bisexual female characters as aggressive, manipulative, or dangerous
• This trope plays into harmful stereotypes and contributes to the fetishization of lesbian relationships
• Examples include Sharon Stone's character in Basic Instinct and Lena Luthor (Supergirl)

Flamboyant and effeminate men

• Gay male characters have often been portrayed as flamboyant, effeminate, and stereotypically feminine
• This trope reduces gay men to a single, narrow representation and reinforces gender stereotypes
• Examples include Jack McFarland (Will & Grace), Kurt Hummel (Glee), and Cameron Tucker (Modern Family)

Evolving LGBTQ+ representation

• LGBTQ+ representation in television has evolved significantly in recent years, with more diverse and authentic portrayals of queer characters and stories
• Analyzing the shifts in representation reveals the progress made and the ongoing challenges in creating inclusive and nuanced LGBTQ+ content
• The evolving landscape of LGBTQ+ representation reflects broader societal changes and the impact of activism and advocacy

Increase in complex characters

• Recent years have seen an increase in complex, multi-dimensional LGBTQ+ characters who defy stereotypes and tropes
• Shows like Orange Is the New Black, Sense8, and The Fosters have featured diverse LGBTQ+ characters with nuanced backstories and development
• Complex characters allow for a more authentic representation of the diversity within LGBTQ+ communities

Non-stereotypical relationship dynamics

• LGBTQ+ relationships in television have increasingly moved beyond stereotypical dynamics and tropes
• Shows like Schitt's Creek, The L Word: Generation Q, and Killing Eve have depicted queer relationships as complex, loving, and multi-faceted
• Non-stereotypical relationship dynamics normalize LGBTQ+ love and challenge heteronormative assumptions

Normalizing queer identities

• Recent LGBTQ+ representation has focused on normalizing queer identities and experiences, portraying them as a natural part of everyday life
• Shows like Brooklyn Nine-Nine, One Day at a Time, and Vida integrate LGBTQ+ characters and storylines seamlessly into their narratives
• Normalizing representation helps to reduce stigma and increase acceptance of LGBTQ+ individuals

Remaining gaps and opportunities

• Despite progress, there are still gaps and opportunities for improvement in LGBTQ+ television representation
• Underrepresented identities, such as transgender men, non-binary individuals, and LGBTQ+ people with disabilities, require more authentic and diverse representation
• Intersectional representation that acknowledges the diversity within LGBTQ+ communities remains an ongoing challenge and opportunity

Behind the scenes representation

• LGBTQ+ representation in television extends beyond the characters and stories depicted on screen, also encompassing the individuals working behind the scenes
• Examining the representation of LGBTQ+ individuals in creative roles, such as writers, directors, and producers, reveals the impact of diverse perspectives on authentic storytelling
• Behind the scenes representation is crucial for ensuring that LGBTQ+ stories are told with sensitivity, nuance, and lived experience

LGBTQ+ writers and showrunners

• LGBTQ+ writers and showrunners bring their own experiences and perspectives to the creative process, shaping the authenticity of queer storytelling
• Shows like Pose, Transparent, and Queer as Folk have benefited from the input and leadership of LGBTQ+ creators
• Increasing representation of LGBTQ+ individuals in writing rooms and leadership roles is essential for diverse and authentic storytelling

Out actors playing queer roles

• The casting of openly LGBTQ+ actors in queer roles has been a point of discussion and advocacy in the television industry
• Shows like Pose, Batwoman, and Queer Eye have featured out actors portraying LGBTQ+ characters
• Out actors bring their lived experiences to the roles and provide authentic representation both on and off screen

Straight actors and roles

• The casting of straight actors in LGBTQ+ roles has been a controversial topic, with arguments for and against the practice
• Some argue that acting is about embodying different experiences, while others emphasize the importance of authentic representation
• The debate surrounding straight actors in queer roles highlights the ongoing challenges and considerations in LGBTQ+ casting

Consultants and sensitivity readers

• LGBTQ+ consultants and sensitivity readers play a crucial role in ensuring that queer stories are told with accuracy, sensitivity, and respect
• Shows like Transparent, Pose, and The L Word have utilized LGBTQ+ consultants to guide their storytelling and representation
• Consultants and sensitivity readers help to prevent harmful stereotypes, inaccuracies, and offensive content

Cultural impact and activism

• LGBTQ+ representation in television has had a significant cultural impact, shaping societal attitudes, activism, and policy change
• Examining the broader effects of LGBTQ+ representation reveals the power of television to influence public discourse and drive social progress
• The interplay between television representation and LGBTQ+ activism highlights the ongoing fight for equality and acceptance

Positive impact on acceptance

• Positive and authentic LGBTQ+ representation in television has contributed to increased acceptance and understanding of queer identities
• Shows like Will & Grace, Modern Family, and Glee have been credited with shifting public attitudes and normalizing LGBTQ+ individuals and relationships
• Television representation has the power to humanize LGBTQ+ experiences and foster empathy among viewers

Backlash and anti-LGBTQ+ activism

• LGBTQ+ representation in television has also faced backlash and anti-LGBTQ+ activism from conservative groups and individuals
• Shows with queer content have faced boycotts, advertiser pullouts, and censorship efforts (Ellen, Glee)
• Backlash against LGBTQ+ representation highlights the ongoing challenges and resistance to queer visibility and acceptance

Representation and policy change

• LGBTQ+ television representation has played a role in shaping public opinion and influencing policy change
• Visibility and normalization of LGBTQ+ identities on television have contributed to shifts in attitudes towards issues like same-sex marriage and anti-discrimination protections
• Television representation has the potential to create a more accepting and inclusive society by influencing hearts and minds

Ongoing fight for equality

• Despite progress in LGBTQ+ television representation and cultural acceptance, the fight for full equality and inclusion continues
• Challenges like the underrepresentation of diverse LGBTQ+ identities, ongoing stereotyping, and real-world discrimination persist
• Television representation remains an important tool in the ongoing fight for LGBTQ+ rights, visibility, and acceptance