10.1 Types of Assessment in Curriculum

Assessment is crucial in curriculum development, helping gauge student progress and inform teaching strategies. From formative quizzes to summative exams, various methods track learning throughout courses. Each type has its strengths and weaknesses, shaping how educators measure and support student growth.

Using multiple assessment types provides a well-rounded view of student learning. This approach accommodates diverse learning styles, increases result validity, and boosts student engagement. By combining different methods, educators can paint a more accurate picture of each student's progress and needs.

Types of Assessment in Curriculum

Formative vs summative assessments

Top images from around the web for Formative vs summative assessments

• 

  Chapter: Curriculum Design, Development and Models: Planning for Student Learning – Curriculum ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Life of an Educator - Dr. Justin Tarte: Have 'summative' assessments become obsolete? View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Chapter: Curriculum Design, Development and Models: Planning for Student Learning – Curriculum ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Life of an Educator - Dr. Justin Tarte: Have 'summative' assessments become obsolete? View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 2

Top images from around the web for Formative vs summative assessments

• 

  Chapter: Curriculum Design, Development and Models: Planning for Student Learning – Curriculum ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Life of an Educator - Dr. Justin Tarte: Have 'summative' assessments become obsolete? View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Chapter: Curriculum Design, Development and Models: Planning for Student Learning – Curriculum ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Life of an Educator - Dr. Justin Tarte: Have 'summative' assessments become obsolete? View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 2

• Formative assessments monitor student learning progress throughout the instructional process (quizzes, homework, class discussions) providing feedback to students and teachers to identify areas for improvement and adjust instruction
• Summative assessments evaluate student mastery of learning objectives at the end of a learning unit or course (final exams, term papers, capstone projects) assigning grades or scores to measure overall achievement

Types of curriculum assessments

• Performance-based assessments require students to demonstrate knowledge and skills through authentic tasks or projects (presentations, simulations, experiments) assessing higher-order thinking skills and real-world applications
• Portfolio assessments collect student work over time (essays, artwork, multimedia projects) demonstrating growth, reflection, and achievement of learning objectives through various types of artifacts
• Standardized tests administer uniform tests scored consistently across a large population (SAT, ACT, state-mandated tests) often using multiple-choice or short-answer formats to compare student performance against established norms or benchmarks

Benefits of multiple assessments

• Provides a comprehensive picture of student learning by measuring different aspects (knowledge, skills, attitudes) and accommodating diverse learning styles and preferences
• Increases validity and reliability of assessment results by reducing bias and limitations of individual assessment methods and allowing for triangulation of data from multiple sources
• Promotes student engagement and motivation by offering opportunities to demonstrate learning in various ways and encouraging self-reflection and goal-setting

Strengths and limitations of assessments

• Performance-based assessments
  • Strengths: provide authentic measures of higher-order thinking skills and rich data on student learning
  • Limitations: time-consuming to develop and score with potential subjectivity in scoring
• Portfolio assessments
  • Strengths: showcase student growth over time promoting self-reflection and ownership of learning
  • Limitations: time-consuming to compile and evaluate with possible lack of standardization across students
• Standardized tests
  • Strengths: efficient for large-scale assessment providing normative data for comparison
  • Limitations: may not capture complex thinking skills and can lead to teaching to the test