21.1 Bias and fairness in deep learning models

Deep learning models can perpetuate biases, leading to unfair outcomes for certain groups. Algorithmic bias stems from various sources, including training data, feature selection, and deployment context. Understanding these biases is crucial for developing equitable AI systems.

Detecting and mitigating bias involves techniques like data audits, fairness metrics, and adversarial debiasing. Strategies for equitable AI performance include fairness-aware machine learning, explainable AI, and diverse development teams. Continuous monitoring and feedback loops are essential for ongoing improvement.

Understanding Bias and Fairness in Deep Learning Models

Algorithmic bias in deep learning

Top images from around the web for Algorithmic bias in deep learning

• 

  A Snapshot of the Frontiers of Fairness in Machine Learning (Research Summary) | Montreal AI ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Research summary: Algorithmic Bias: On the Implicit Biases of Social Technology | Montreal AI ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Glossary of Deep Learning: Bias – Deeper Learning – Medium View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  A Snapshot of the Frontiers of Fairness in Machine Learning (Research Summary) | Montreal AI ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Research summary: Algorithmic Bias: On the Implicit Biases of Social Technology | Montreal AI ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Algorithmic bias in deep learning

• 

  A Snapshot of the Frontiers of Fairness in Machine Learning (Research Summary) | Montreal AI ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Research summary: Algorithmic Bias: On the Implicit Biases of Social Technology | Montreal AI ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Glossary of Deep Learning: Bias – Deeper Learning – Medium View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  A Snapshot of the Frontiers of Fairness in Machine Learning (Research Summary) | Montreal AI ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Research summary: Algorithmic Bias: On the Implicit Biases of Social Technology | Montreal AI ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Algorithmic bias creates systematic errors in computer systems leading to unfair outcomes for certain groups (racial minorities, women)
• Sources of bias in deep learning models stem from various factors:
  • Training data bias arises from underrepresentation of certain groups or historical prejudices reflected in data (facial recognition systems performing poorly on darker skin tones)
  • Feature selection bias occurs when choosing input features that favor certain groups (using zip codes as a proxy for creditworthiness)
  • Algorithmic processing bias emerges from model architecture or optimization methods amplifying existing biases (gradient descent converging to unfair local optima)
  • Deployment context bias happens when applying models in contexts different from training environments (medical diagnosis system trained on US population used in developing countries)
• Types of bias manifest in different ways:
  • Sampling bias skews data collection (oversampling urban populations)
  • Prejudice bias reflects societal biases (gender stereotypes in language models)
  • Measurement bias arises from flawed data collection methods (inaccurate crime statistics)
  • Aggregation bias occurs when combining distinct subgroups (averaging test scores across diverse schools)

Bias detection and mitigation techniques

• Detecting bias in training data involves:
  • Data audits examine dataset composition and potential biases
  • Statistical analysis of dataset demographics reveals underrepresentation
  • Representation tests assess the diversity of samples across protected attributes
• Mitigating bias in training data employs methods such as:
  • Data augmentation generates additional samples for underrepresented groups
  • Resampling techniques balance class distributions (oversampling minority classes)
  • Synthetic data generation creates artificial samples to address imbalances (GANs)
• Detecting bias in model outputs utilizes:
  • Fairness metrics quantify disparities:
    1. Demographic parity ensures equal positive prediction rates across groups
    2. Equal opportunity guarantees equal true positive rates
    3. Equalized odds ensures equal true positive and false positive rates
  • Slice-based analysis evaluates model performance on specific subgroups
  • Adversarial debiasing identifies and removes biased features during training
• Mitigating bias in model outputs implements:
  • Post-processing techniques adjust model predictions to achieve fairness (threshold adjustment)
  • Regularization methods penalize unfair solutions during training (fairness constraints)
  • Adversarial debiasing during training removes sensitive information from latent representations

Fairness evaluation across demographics

• Fairness criteria define different notions of equity:
  • Group fairness ensures similar treatment for protected groups (equal hire rates across genders)
  • Individual fairness treats similar individuals similarly (comparable loan terms for similar applicants)
  • Counterfactual fairness maintains predictions under attribute changes (same job offer if gender were different)
• Evaluation metrics quantify fairness:
  • Disparate impact measures the ratio of positive outcomes between groups
  • Equal opportunity difference compares true positive rates across groups
  • Average odds difference assesses overall classification rate differences
• Intersectionality considerations analyze multiple protected attributes simultaneously (race and gender in employment decisions)
• Fairness-accuracy trade-offs explore the balance between model performance and equity (Pareto frontier analysis)
• Benchmarking against human decision-makers compares AI fairness to existing processes
• Cross-validation techniques for fairness assessment ensure consistent fairness across data splits

Strategies for equitable AI performance

• Fairness-aware machine learning incorporates equity throughout the pipeline:
  • Pre-processing methods modify training data:
    1. Reweighing adjusts instance weights to balance outcomes
    2. Disparate impact remover transforms features to remove bias
  • In-processing methods modify the learning algorithm:
    1. Adversarial debiasing learns fair representations during training
    2. Prejudice remover regularizer penalizes biased predictions
  • Post-processing methods adjust model outputs:
    1. Reject option classification withholds predictions in uncertain cases
    2. Calibrated equalized odds adjusts prediction thresholds for fairness
• Explainable AI techniques provide insight into model decisions:
  • LIME explains individual predictions through local approximations
  • SHAP attributes feature importance using game theory concepts
• Diverse and inclusive development teams bring varied perspectives to AI development
• Ethical guidelines and governance frameworks establish principles for responsible AI
• Continuous monitoring and auditing of deployed models track fairness over time
• Feedback loops for ongoing improvement integrate:
  • User feedback to identify real-world biases and issues
  • Regular model updates and retraining to address emerging fairness concerns