The Double Diamond model is a design framework that guides problem-solving through four phases: , , , and . It balances divergent and convergent thinking, encouraging exploration and focused decision-making throughout the design process.
This approach helps designers tackle complex challenges by emphasizing user needs, iterative development, and collaboration. While it shares similarities with and agile methods, the Double Diamond provides a structured yet flexible framework for creating innovative solutions across various industries.
Origins of double diamond model
Developed by the British in 2005 as a visual framework for the design process
Based on research into the design processes used by 11 leading global brands
Aims to provide a structured approach to tackling complex problems and creating innovative solutions
Emphasizes the importance of both divergent and convergent thinking at different stages of the design process
Four phases of double diamond
Discover phase
Top images from around the web for Discover phase
Framework for Innovation - Design Council View original
Is this image relevant?
Design Process - The Double Diamond Model | eda.c | Flickr View original
Is this image relevant?
Triple Diamond | Dinker Charak | Startups, Product Management, Random View original
Is this image relevant?
Framework for Innovation - Design Council View original
Is this image relevant?
Design Process - The Double Diamond Model | eda.c | Flickr View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Discover phase
Framework for Innovation - Design Council View original
Is this image relevant?
Design Process - The Double Diamond Model | eda.c | Flickr View original
Is this image relevant?
Triple Diamond | Dinker Charak | Startups, Product Management, Random View original
Is this image relevant?
Framework for Innovation - Design Council View original
Is this image relevant?
Design Process - The Double Diamond Model | eda.c | Flickr View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
The first phase focuses on exploring the problem space and gathering insights
Involves conducting research to understand user needs, market trends, and business requirements
Uses methods such as , observations, and desk research to gather a wide range of information
Aims to identify opportunities and challenges that will inform the rest of the design process
Encourages divergent thinking to generate a broad range of ideas and possibilities
Define phase
The second phase involves synthesizing the insights gathered in the Discover phase
Focuses on narrowing down the problem space and defining a clear direction for the project
Uses techniques such as affinity mapping, persona development, and problem statements to create a shared understanding of the challenge
Involves making strategic decisions about which opportunities to pursue and which to set aside
Requires convergent thinking to prioritize ideas and create a focused brief for the next phase
Develop phase
The third phase focuses on generating and refining potential solutions to the problem
Involves ideation sessions, , and testing to explore different design directions
Encourages divergent thinking once again to generate a wide range of ideas and concepts
Uses iterative development to refine and improve solutions based on feedback from users and stakeholders
Aims to create a range of viable options that can be evaluated against the project brief
Deliver phase
The final phase involves selecting the best solution and preparing it for implementation
Focuses on convergent thinking to make final decisions and create detailed plans for execution
Involves creating high-fidelity prototypes, conducting final user testing, and preparing assets for launch
Requires collaboration with cross-functional teams (marketing, engineering) to ensure successful delivery
Emphasizes the importance of measuring success and learning from the process to inform future projects
Divergent vs convergent thinking
The double diamond model alternates between divergent and convergent thinking modes
Divergent thinking involves generating a wide range of ideas and possibilities without judgment
Encourages creativity, exploration, and open-mindedness
Uses techniques such as , mind mapping, and lateral thinking
Convergent thinking involves narrowing down options and making decisions based on specific criteria
Focuses on analysis, evaluation, and prioritization
Uses techniques such as dot voting, weighted decision matrices, and SWOT analysis
Effective design requires a balance of both divergent and convergent thinking at different stages
Benefits of double diamond approach
Encourages exploration
The Discover phase provides a structured way to explore the problem space and gather insights
Encourages designers to challenge assumptions and look beyond obvious solutions
Helps to identify hidden opportunities and unmet user needs that can drive innovation
Focuses on problem definition
The Define phase ensures that the team has a clear and shared understanding of the problem
Helps to avoid jumping to solutions too quickly without fully understanding the context
Provides a solid foundation for the rest of the design process and ensures that solutions are aligned with user needs and business goals
Iterative development process
The Develop phase emphasizes the importance of prototyping and testing to refine solutions
Encourages a fail-fast approach where ideas are quickly tested and improved based on feedback
Allows for a more agile and responsive design process that can adapt to changing requirements and insights
User-centric deliverables
The Deliver phase focuses on creating solutions that are tailored to the needs of the end-users
Emphasizes the importance of user testing and feedback throughout the design process
Helps to ensure that the final deliverables are effective, usable, and desirable for the target audience
Applying double diamond in practice
Tools for each phase
Discover: user interviews, contextual inquiry, stakeholder workshops, market research
Define: journey mapping, user , problem statements, design principles
Deliver: high-fidelity mockups, user acceptance testing, style guides, handover documentation
Team collaboration throughout process
The double diamond model emphasizes the importance of collaboration and
Involves bringing together cross-functional teams (design, research, engineering, business) to share insights and ideas
Uses workshops, design sprints, and other collaborative techniques to facilitate teamwork and alignment
Helps to break down silos and ensure that everyone is working towards a common goal
Adapting model to specific projects
The double diamond model provides a general framework that can be adapted to different types of projects
The specific tools and techniques used in each phase may vary depending on the context and constraints
The duration and emphasis of each phase may also differ based on the project scope and timeline
It's important to tailor the approach to the specific needs of the project while still following the overall structure and principles
Limitations and criticisms
Oversimplification of design process
Some critics argue that the double diamond model oversimplifies the complexity of real-world design projects
The model may not capture all of the nuances and iterations that occur in practice
It's important to use the model as a guide rather than a rigid prescription and to adapt it as needed
Potential for scope creep
The divergent thinking phases (Discover and Develop) can sometimes lead to scope creep if not managed carefully
It's important to have clear boundaries and criteria for evaluating ideas and deciding which ones to pursue
The Define phase plays a crucial role in keeping the project focused and aligned with the original goals
Need for experienced practitioners
The double diamond model requires skilled facilitation and experienced practitioners to be used effectively
Novice designers may struggle with knowing when and how to switch between divergent and convergent thinking modes
It's important to provide training and support to help teams use the model successfully and to learn from experienced practitioners
Double diamond vs other design models
Comparison to design thinking
The double diamond model shares many similarities with the design thinking process
Both emphasize the importance of empathy, ideation, and experimentation in solving complex problems
However, the double diamond model provides a more structured framework with distinct phases and activities
Design thinking is often seen as a more general mindset or approach that can be applied in many different ways
Similarities to agile methodology
The double diamond model shares some similarities with agile methodologies such as Scrum and Kanban
Both emphasize the importance of , collaboration, and responsiveness to change
However, the double diamond model is more focused on the early stages of the design process (problem definition and ideation)
Agile methodologies are more focused on the later stages of development and delivery
The two approaches can be used in combination, with the double diamond model guiding the overall design process and agile methodologies used for implementation
Case studies of successful implementation
The British Design Council has published several case studies of organizations that have successfully used the double diamond model
The redesign of the London Ambulance Service's command and control system
The development of a new customer experience for Virgin Atlantic Airways
The creation of a new service model for the UK's National Health Service
These case studies demonstrate how the double diamond model can be applied in different contexts and industries
They highlight the benefits of using a structured and iterative approach to design, such as improved user experiences, increased efficiency, and better alignment with business goals
They also provide insights into the challenges and lessons learned from applying the model in practice, such as the importance of stakeholder engagement and the need for flexibility and adaptation