6.3 Managed Care Organizations and Models

Managed care models aim to control healthcare costs while maintaining quality. Health Maintenance Organizations, Preferred Provider Organizations, and Point of Service plans offer different levels of provider choice and cost-sharing. Each model has its own approach to balancing affordability, access, and patient flexibility.

Primary care physicians play a crucial role in managed care as gatekeepers and care coordinators. These models impact healthcare delivery by emphasizing preventive care, implementing cost control measures, and influencing quality, access, and overall healthcare spending. Understanding these models is key to navigating the modern healthcare landscape.

Managed Care Models

Models of managed care

Top images from around the web for Models of managed care

• 

  LVCHEN 的美國生活指南: HMO, PPO？ 美國的健保真難懂！（上） View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Führungsmodell für Gesundheitsorganisationen (Center for Creative Leadership) - scil View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Role of Wireless Communication in Healthcare System to Cater Disaster Situations ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  LVCHEN 的美國生活指南: HMO, PPO？ 美國的健保真難懂！（上） View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Führungsmodell für Gesundheitsorganisationen (Center for Creative Leadership) - scil View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Models of managed care

• 

  LVCHEN 的美國生活指南: HMO, PPO？ 美國的健保真難懂！（上） View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Führungsmodell für Gesundheitsorganisationen (Center for Creative Leadership) - scil View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Role of Wireless Communication in Healthcare System to Cater Disaster Situations ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  LVCHEN 的美國生活指南: HMO, PPO？ 美國的健保真難懂！（上） View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Führungsmodell für Gesundheitsorganisationen (Center for Creative Leadership) - scil View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs) deliver comprehensive healthcare services to members for a fixed prepaid fee (capitation), requiring patients to select a primary care physician (PCP) who coordinates care and provides referrals to specialists within a limited provider network (Kaiser Permanente), resulting in lower premiums and out-of-pocket costs but restricted patient choice
• Preferred Provider Organizations (PPOs) contract with a network of providers to offer discounted rates, allowing patients to see any in-network provider without a referral (Blue Cross Blue Shield) or out-of-network providers at a higher cost, providing more flexibility than HMOs but with generally higher premiums and out-of-pocket expenses
• Point of Service (POS) plans blend elements of HMOs and PPOs, requiring patients to choose a PCP for care coordination and referrals (UnitedHealthcare) while permitting out-of-network visits at a higher cost, offering a middle ground between the restrictiveness of HMOs and the flexibility of PPOs

Role of primary care physicians

• Primary care physicians (PCPs) function as gatekeepers in managed care, overseeing patient care and managing overall health by
  • Delivering preventive services (annual physicals, immunizations)
  • Diagnosing and treating common illnesses (flu, strep throat)
  • Managing chronic conditions (diabetes, hypertension)
• PCPs assess the necessity for specialty care and issue referrals when needed in plans like HMOs, helping to control costs and ensure appropriate utilization of services (MRI for persistent back pain)

Pros and cons of managed care

• Advantages for patients include lower out-of-pocket expenses compared to traditional fee-for-service plans (lower copays) and a focus on preventive care and care coordination (disease management programs)
• Disadvantages for patients involve constrained provider choice, particularly in HMOs (in-network only), and potential limitations on access to certain treatments or services (experimental therapies)
• Advantages for providers encompass a guaranteed patient base through contracts with managed care organizations (steady revenue stream) and potential financial incentives for delivering cost-effective care (bonuses for meeting quality metrics)
• Disadvantages for providers comprise reduced clinical decision-making autonomy (adherence to clinical guidelines) and increased administrative workload related to referrals and prior authorizations (paperwork)
• Advantages for payers consist of cost control through negotiated provider rates (discounts) and utilization management (prior authorization) as well as predictable healthcare spending via capitation and other payment models (fixed per-member-per-month fees)
• Disadvantages for payers include the potential for adverse selection, attracting sicker enrollees (individuals with pre-existing conditions), and administrative expenses associated with managing provider networks and utilization (claims processing)

Impact on healthcare delivery

• Quality
  • Emphasis on preventive services and care coordination can improve health outcomes (lower rates of preventable hospitalizations)
  • Potential for underutilization of necessary services due to cost-control measures (rationing)
  • Quality measures and performance incentives can promote evidence-based care (pay-for-performance programs)
• Access
  • Lower out-of-pocket costs can enhance access to care for some patients (reduced financial barriers)
  • Limited provider networks may restrict access to certain providers or specialists (narrow networks)
  • Referral requirements and prior authorizations can postpone access to needed services (waiting periods)
• Costs
  • Managed care has contributed to slowing the growth of healthcare spending through various cost-control mechanisms
    1. Negotiated provider rates (fee schedules)
    2. Capitation (fixed payments per patient)
    3. Utilization management (medical necessity reviews)
  • Shift towards value-based payment models that reward quality and efficiency (accountable care organizations)
  • Potential for cost-shifting to patients via higher premiums, deductibles, and copayments (increased cost-sharing)