You have 3 free guides left 😟
Unlock your guides
You have 3 free guides left 😟
Unlock your guides

12.3 Risk characterization and uncertainty analysis

2 min readaugust 7, 2024

Risk characterization and uncertainty analysis are crucial components of ecological risk assessment. These processes involve quantifying potential risks to ecosystems and analyzing the uncertainties inherent in . By using methods like hazard quotients and probabilistic risk assessment, scientists can better understand and communicate environmental threats.

Uncertainty analysis is essential for interpreting risk assessment results. It involves identifying and quantifying sources of uncertainty, such as data limitations and model assumptions. This analysis helps prioritize research efforts and informs decision-makers about the of risk estimates, enabling more effective environmental management strategies.

Risk Assessment Methods

Quantifying Risk

Top images from around the web for Quantifying Risk
Top images from around the web for Quantifying Risk
  • calculates the ratio of the estimated exposure concentration to the reference value (e.g., no-observed-adverse-effect level)
    • HQ values greater than 1 indicate potential risk and the need for further assessment or risk management actions
    • HQ does not provide information on the probability or magnitude of adverse effects
  • incorporates and uncertainty in exposure and effects data to estimate the probability and magnitude of adverse effects
    • PRA uses probability distributions for input variables (exposure concentrations, toxicity values) instead of single point estimates
    • is a common technique used in PRA to randomly sample from input distributions and generate a distribution of risk estimates

Integrating Multiple Lines of Evidence

  • Weight-of-evidence (WoE) approach integrates multiple lines of evidence (e.g., field studies, laboratory tests, modeling results) to assess risk
    • WoE considers the quality, relevance, and consistency of evidence in reaching conclusions about risk
    • WoE can help address uncertainties and limitations of individual lines of evidence
    • WoE approaches can be qualitative (e.g., scoring systems) or quantitative (e.g., Bayesian networks)

Uncertainty Analysis

Identifying and Quantifying Uncertainties

  • evaluates how changes in input variables (e.g., exposure concentrations, toxicity values) affect risk estimates
    • Identifies the input variables that have the greatest influence on risk estimates
    • Helps prioritize data collection and refinement efforts to reduce uncertainties
  • are used to account for uncertainties in extrapolating from limited data (e.g., interspecies differences, subchronic-to-chronic extrapolation)
    • Default uncertainty factors (e.g., 10-fold) are often used in the absence of chemical-specific data
    • Uncertainty factors can be refined based on data availability and scientific judgment

Interpreting and Communicating Uncertainties

  • considers the biological relevance of predicted risks in the context of population- and ecosystem-level effects
    • Magnitude, duration, and are important considerations
    • and can mitigate risks
  • Uncertainty analysis should be clearly communicated to risk managers and stakeholders
    • Limitations and assumptions of the risk assessment should be transparently described
    • Range of plausible risk estimates and confidence in conclusions should be presented
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.


© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.

© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.
Glossary
Glossary