Affirmative action in education emerged from civil rights efforts to combat racial discrimination. Kennedy and Johnson's executive orders laid the groundwork, requiring non-discrimination and proactive measures to increase minority representation in federal employment and contracting.
Supreme Court cases shaped affirmative action policies in higher education. Landmark decisions like Bakke, Grutter, and Fisher allowed race-conscious admissions but set strict guidelines. These rulings sparked debates on quotas, , and the value of in education.
Executive Orders and Early Affirmative Action
Kennedy's Groundbreaking Order
Top images from around the web for Kennedy's Groundbreaking Order
File:Executive Order 10924, Page 2.jpg - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
File:John F. Kennedy speaks at Rice University.jpg - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
The Civil Rights Movement Continues | US History II (American Yawp) View original
Is this image relevant?
File:Executive Order 10924, Page 2.jpg - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
File:John F. Kennedy speaks at Rice University.jpg - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Kennedy's Groundbreaking Order
File:Executive Order 10924, Page 2.jpg - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
File:John F. Kennedy speaks at Rice University.jpg - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
The Civil Rights Movement Continues | US History II (American Yawp) View original
Is this image relevant?
File:Executive Order 10924, Page 2.jpg - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
File:John F. Kennedy speaks at Rice University.jpg - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
issued by President John F. Kennedy in 1961
Established the Committee on Equal Employment Opportunity
Required government contractors to take "affirmative action" to ensure non-discrimination
Marked the first use of the term "affirmative action" in a legal context
Aimed to address racial discrimination in federal employment and contracting
Johnson's Expansion of Affirmative Action
signed by President Lyndon B. Johnson in 1965
Prohibited discrimination based on race, color, religion, and national origin by federal contractors
Required contractors to implement affirmative action plans to increase minority employment
Established the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) to enforce the order
Later amended to include sex as a protected category in 1967
Landmark Supreme Court Cases
Bakke and the Constitutionality of Race-Conscious Admissions
decided in 1978
Challenged UC Davis Medical School's admissions policy reserving 16 out of 100 seats for minority students
Supreme Court ruled unconstitutional but allowed race to be considered as one factor in admissions
Established the principle of diversity as a compelling state interest in higher education
Set the stage for future affirmative action cases in education
Grutter and the Narrowly Tailored Use of Race
decided in 2003
Challenged the University of Michigan Law School's admissions policy
Supreme Court upheld the use of race as one factor among many in holistic review processes
Reaffirmed diversity as a compelling interest in higher education
Set a 25-year time limit on the use of race-conscious
Fisher and the Strict Scrutiny Standard
decided in 2013 (Fisher I) and 2016 (Fisher II)
Challenged UT Austin's consideration of race in admissions for students not admitted under the Top Ten Percent Plan
Supreme Court applied strict scrutiny standard to evaluate the university's use of race
Upheld UT Austin's admissions policy as narrowly tailored to achieve diversity
Emphasized the need for universities to continually assess the necessity of race-conscious admissions
Controversial Aspects of Affirmative Action
Quota Systems and Their Legal Challenges
Quota systems involve setting aside a specific number or percentage of positions for minority groups
Declared unconstitutional in Bakke case for violating the Equal Protection Clause
Led to the development of "goals and timetables" as an alternative approach
Criticized for potentially excluding qualified candidates based solely on race or ethnicity
Proponents argue quotas necessary to overcome systemic discrimination and achieve meaningful diversity
The Reverse Discrimination Debate
Reverse discrimination refers to perceived unfair treatment of majority groups due to affirmative action policies
Critics argue affirmative action violates principles of and