6.4 No Child Left Behind and High-Stakes Testing

No Child Left Behind (NCLB) aimed to boost student achievement through accountability. It required yearly testing, set performance targets, and imposed consequences for schools falling short. The law sparked debates about its effectiveness in closing achievement gaps.

NCLB's focus on high-stakes testing reshaped American education. It led to more standardized assessments, data-driven decision-making, and school choice options. Critics argued it narrowed curricula and unfairly punished struggling schools.

No Child Left Behind Act

Overview and Key Components of NCLB

Top images from around the web for Overview and Key Components of NCLB

• 

  Many Children Left Behind: How the No Child Left Behind Act is Damaging Our Children and Our ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Education Policy | Boundless Political Science View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  No Child Left Behind Act - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Many Children Left Behind: How the No Child Left Behind Act is Damaging Our Children and Our ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Education Policy | Boundless Political Science View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Overview and Key Components of NCLB

• 

  Many Children Left Behind: How the No Child Left Behind Act is Damaging Our Children and Our ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Education Policy | Boundless Political Science View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  No Child Left Behind Act - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Many Children Left Behind: How the No Child Left Behind Act is Damaging Our Children and Our ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Education Policy | Boundless Political Science View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Enacted in 2001 under President George W. Bush's administration
• Reauthorized the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965
• Aimed to improve academic achievement for all students, particularly disadvantaged groups
• Established nationwide accountability standards for schools and districts
• Required states to develop assessments in basic skills administered to students in certain grades

Adequate Yearly Progress and Accountability Measures

• Introduced Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) as a measurement of school performance
• AYP required schools to demonstrate continuous improvement in student achievement
• Schools measured progress through standardized test scores and other academic indicators
• Set goal of 100% proficiency in reading and math for all students by 2014
• Mandated disaggregation of student performance data by subgroups (race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, disability)

Consequences and Sanctions for Underperforming Schools

• Implemented a system of sanctions for schools failing to meet AYP targets
• First year of failure resulted in being placed on a "watch list"
• Second consecutive year led to designation as "in need of improvement"
• Subsequent years of failure triggered more severe consequences:
  • Allowing students to transfer to better-performing schools
  • Providing supplemental educational services (tutoring)
  • Restructuring the school's administration or curriculum
  • Potential closure or conversion to a charter school
• Aimed to create incentives for schools to improve performance and close achievement gaps

Emphasis on Testing and Accountability

Standardized Testing and Its Role in NCLB

• Mandated annual testing in reading and math for grades 3-8 and once in high school
• Required science assessments to be administered at least once in elementary, middle, and high school
• Emphasized the use of standardized tests as primary measure of student achievement
• Led to increased focus on test preparation in many schools (test-taking strategies)
• Sparked debates about teaching to the test versus broader educational goals

Accountability Systems and Achievement Gap Reduction

• Established accountability systems to track school and district performance
• Required states to create report cards detailing student achievement data
• Aimed to reduce achievement gaps between different student subgroups
• Focused on improving outcomes for historically underserved populations (low-income students, students with disabilities, English language learners)
• Led to increased attention on data-driven decision making in education

Teacher Quality and Professional Development

• Introduced "highly qualified teacher" requirements
• Mandated teachers to have at least a bachelor's degree and full state certification
• Required teachers to demonstrate subject matter competency in core academic subjects
• Emphasized ongoing professional development for educators
• Led to changes in teacher preparation programs and certification processes
• Aimed to ensure all students, especially those in high-poverty schools, had access to effective teachers

School Choice and Consequences

Expanded School Choice Options

• Provided parents with more educational options for their children
• Allowed students in low-performing schools to transfer to higher-performing public schools
• Encouraged the growth of charter schools as alternatives to traditional public schools
• Promoted public school choice as a means of fostering competition and improvement
• Led to debates about the impact of school choice on educational equity and resource allocation

Sanctions and Interventions for Underperforming Schools

• Implemented a tiered system of sanctions for schools failing to meet AYP targets
• Required schools to develop improvement plans after two consecutive years of failing AYP
• Mandated the provision of supplemental educational services (after-school tutoring)
• Allowed for more drastic interventions in persistently failing schools:
  • Replacement of staff
  • Implementation of new curriculum
  • Extending the school day or year
  • Restructuring the school's governance arrangement
• Aimed to create urgency for school improvement and increase accountability
• Led to criticism about the fairness and effectiveness of punitive measures in education reform