7.2 School and teacher accountability systems

School accountability systems aim to measure and improve educational outcomes. They use various models like standards-based testing and value-added measures to assess student performance and teacher effectiveness.

These systems have evolved to include more holistic approaches, incorporating factors like school climate and student growth. However, they can also lead to unintended consequences, such as narrowed curricula and increased stress on educators and students.

School Accountability Models

Standards-Based and Value-Added Models

Top images from around the web for Standards-Based and Value-Added Models

• 

  Achieving SDG4 through a Human Rights Based Approach to Education View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Which educational policies are most effective for equalising opportunities? - Economics Observatory View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Achieving SDG4 through a Human Rights Based Approach to Education View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Which educational policies are most effective for equalising opportunities? - Economics Observatory View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 2

Top images from around the web for Standards-Based and Value-Added Models

• 

  Achieving SDG4 through a Human Rights Based Approach to Education View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Which educational policies are most effective for equalising opportunities? - Economics Observatory View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Achieving SDG4 through a Human Rights Based Approach to Education View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Which educational policies are most effective for equalising opportunities? - Economics Observatory View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 2

• Accountability systems hold schools and teachers responsible for student performance and educational outcomes
• No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) of 2001 established standards-based accountability model
  • Required annual testing
  • Set performance targets for schools
• Value-added models (VAMs) measure teacher effectiveness by analyzing student growth over time
  • Control for factors outside teacher's control (socioeconomic status, prior achievement)
  • Attempt to isolate teacher's impact on student learning
• Growth models track individual student progress over time
  • Compare performance to expected growth trajectories
  • Provide insights into student improvement regardless of starting point

Performance Reporting and Compensation Systems

• School report cards offer comprehensive overview of school performance
  • Include academic achievement metrics (test scores, proficiency rates)
  • Incorporate graduation rates and college readiness indicators
  • Often feature attendance rates and disciplinary data
• Performance-based compensation systems link teacher pay or bonuses to student achievement
  • May include measures like value-added scores or student growth percentiles
  • Some systems incorporate multiple measures (classroom observations, professional development)
• Peer review and professional development models focus on collaborative evaluation
  • Emphasize teacher growth and improvement rather than punitive measures
  • May include peer observations, mentoring programs, and professional learning communities

Effectiveness of Accountability Measures

Standardized Assessments and Growth Metrics

• Standardized test scores widely used as primary measure of educational outcomes
  • Provide comparable data across schools and districts
  • Effectiveness in capturing true learning debated (may not measure critical thinking or creativity)
• Student growth percentiles (SGPs) measure individual progress relative to academic peers
  • Offer perspective on school and teacher impact beyond absolute achievement levels
  • Allow for comparison of students with similar starting points
• Graduation rates and college enrollment statistics serve as long-term indicators
  • Reflect school's ability to prepare students for post-secondary success
  • May be influenced by factors beyond school control (community resources, family background)

Holistic Evaluation Approaches

• School climate surveys assess learning environment
  • Measure factors like safety, relationships, and engagement
  • Can indirectly affect student outcomes by improving school culture
• Teacher evaluation systems aim to improve instructional quality
  • Often include classroom observations by administrators or peers
  • May incorporate student feedback and self-reflection components
• Longitudinal data systems track student progress over time
  • Allow for analysis of student performance across different schools or districts
  • Help identify patterns and trends in educational outcomes
• Meta-analyses of accountability research provide insights into effective measures
  • Synthesize findings from multiple studies to identify best practices
  • Guide policymakers in designing evidence-based accountability systems

Unintended Consequences of Accountability

Curriculum and Instruction Impacts

• High-stakes testing can lead to narrowing of curriculum
  • Increased focus on tested subjects (math, reading) at expense of others (art, music, physical education)
  • May reduce time for project-based learning or interdisciplinary studies
• Pressure to improve test scores may result in teaching to the test
  • Emphasis on test-taking strategies rather than deep understanding
  • Potential reduction in critical thinking and creativity in instruction
• Resource allocation may be skewed towards students near proficiency thresholds
  • "Bubble students" receive disproportionate attention
  • High-achieving or severely struggling students may be neglected

Equity and Morale Concerns

• Accountability systems can exacerbate educational inequities
  • Schools serving disadvantaged populations may be penalized without addressing underlying socioeconomic factors
  • May lead to increased segregation as families seek "high-performing" schools
• Teacher burnout and turnover rates may increase due to performance pressures
  • Stress associated with meeting accountability targets
  • Perceived lack of autonomy in instructional decisions
• Cheating scandals have emerged in some districts
  • Result of intense pressure to meet performance targets
  • Undermines integrity of educational system and public trust
• Labeling schools as "failing" can stigmatize communities
  • May lead to decreased enrollment or property values
  • Can create self-fulfilling prophecy of low expectations

Stakeholder Roles in Accountability

Government and Research Involvement

• Policymakers at federal, state, and local levels craft accountability legislation
  • Design accountability frameworks and set performance targets
  • Allocate resources for implementation and support
• Education researchers contribute to policy design
  • Provide evidence-based recommendations for effective accountability measures
  • Evaluate existing systems and identify areas for improvement
• Business leaders influence accountability goals
  • Articulate workforce needs to align education with economic demands
  • Support education initiatives through partnerships and funding

Educational Community Participation

• School administrators implement accountability measures
  • Manage impact on school operations and staff
  • Interpret and communicate results to stakeholders
• Teachers' unions advocate for fair evaluation systems
  • Push for multiple measures of teacher effectiveness
  • Seek protection of teacher rights within accountability frameworks
• Parents and community members participate in school governance
  • Demand transparency in accountability reporting
  • Serve on school boards and advisory committees
• Student voices becoming more prominent in accountability discussions
  • Provide feedback on educational quality and learning experiences
  • Participate in school improvement teams and policy forums