8.2 Attribution Theory and Learned Helplessness

Attribution theory explains how we interpret the causes of behavior. It focuses on three dimensions: locus of control, stability, and controllability. These attributions shape our motivation and future actions in areas like academics and sports.

Learned helplessness occurs when we believe we can't control outcomes, leading to giving up. Our explanatory style - how we habitually explain events - affects our resilience. Self-efficacy, our belief in our abilities, strongly influences our choices, effort, and persistence in challenging situations.

Attribution Theories

Attributional Dimensions

Top images from around the web for Attributional Dimensions

• 

  Individual Components of Motivation | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Free Attribution Theory PowerPoint Template - Free PowerPoint Templates - SlideHunter.com View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Learning Approaches | Introduction to Psychology – Reinke View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Individual Components of Motivation | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Free Attribution Theory PowerPoint Template - Free PowerPoint Templates - SlideHunter.com View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Attributional Dimensions

• 

  Individual Components of Motivation | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Free Attribution Theory PowerPoint Template - Free PowerPoint Templates - SlideHunter.com View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Learning Approaches | Introduction to Psychology – Reinke View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Individual Components of Motivation | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Free Attribution Theory PowerPoint Template - Free PowerPoint Templates - SlideHunter.com View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Attribution theory explains how individuals interpret the causes of their own and others' behavior based on three main dimensions: locus of control, stability, and controllability
• Locus of control refers to whether the cause of an event or behavior is perceived as internal (within the person) or external (outside the person's control)
  • Internal locus of control attributes success or failure to personal factors such as effort, ability, or motivation (studying hard for an exam)
  • External locus of control attributes outcomes to external factors like luck, task difficulty, or the actions of others (a teacher giving an unfairly difficult test)
• Stability dimension describes whether the cause is seen as stable and unchanging over time or as unstable and varying
  • Stable attributions suggest the cause is a constant factor that will likely persist in the future (innate intelligence)
  • Unstable attributions indicate the cause is temporary or fluctuates (mood on a particular day)
• Controllability refers to the degree to which an individual believes they can control or influence the cause of an event
  • Controllable attributions are causes that a person can alter or affect through their actions (choice of study strategies)
  • Uncontrollable attributions are causes perceived as beyond personal control or influence (a sudden illness)

Impact on Motivation and Behavior

• Attributions shape expectations, emotions, and future behavior in achievement contexts like academics or sports
• Students who attribute success to internal, stable, and controllable factors (ability, effort) tend to have higher motivation, persistence, and performance
  • Believing "I did well because I studied hard and used effective strategies" fosters pride, confidence, and continued effort
• Attributing failure to internal, stable, uncontrollable causes (lack of ability) can lead to shame, low expectations, and giving up
  • Thinking "I failed because I'm not smart enough" undermines self-esteem and motivation to keep trying
• Attributing failure to internal, unstable, controllable factors (lack of effort) is less detrimental as it suggests improvement is possible
  • Concluding "I didn't do well because I didn't study enough" maintains hope and encourages better effort in the future

Learned Helplessness and Explanatory Style

Learned Helplessness Theory

• Learned helplessness occurs when repeated exposure to uncontrollable negative events leads to the belief that one is incapable of affecting outcomes
• Experiments showed that animals and humans who experienced uncontrollable aversive stimuli often became passive and stopped trying to escape or improve their situation, even when escape later became possible
• Students who repeatedly fail despite trying may conclude that academic outcomes are uncontrollable and develop learned helplessness
  • Helpless students tend to give up quickly, display less motivation and effort, and perform poorly, creating a self-fulfilling cycle
• Learned helplessness can generalize beyond the original situation, causing pervasive motivational, cognitive, and emotional deficits

Explanatory Styles and Resiliency

• Explanatory style is a person's habitual way of explaining the causes of events, especially negative ones
• Optimistic explanatory style attributes failure to external, unstable, specific causes, while pessimistic style uses internal, stable, global attributions
  • Optimistic: "I failed the test because it was very difficult and I was tired that day" (external, unstable, specific)
  • Pessimistic: "I failed because I'm stupid and bad at everything" (internal, stable, global)
• Optimistic explanatory style buffers against learned helplessness and promotes resilience by protecting self-esteem, maintaining hope, and limiting generalization of helplessness
• Pessimistic style increases vulnerability to learned helplessness, depression, and poor achievement by undermining motivation and generalizing failure
• Explanatory styles can be modified through techniques like cognitive-behavioral therapy or attribution retraining to promote resilience

Self-Efficacy and Mastery

Self-Efficacy Beliefs

• Self-efficacy refers to an individual's belief in their capacity to execute behaviors necessary to produce specific performance attainments
• Self-efficacy beliefs influence the choices people make, the effort they expend, their persistence in the face of challenges, and their emotional reactions
• Students with high self-efficacy set challenging goals, apply effort and strategic thinking, persist longer, and bounce back from setbacks more readily
  • A student who believes "I can master this material if I use the right strategies and keep practicing" will work harder and achieve more
• Low self-efficacy leads to avoidance of difficult tasks, low aspirations, weak commitment, anxiety, and self-doubt that undermine performance
  • A student thinking "I'll never be good at math no matter what I do" is likely to give up easily and fail to reach their potential

Mastery Experiences and Other Sources

• Mastery experiences are the most powerful source of self-efficacy as they provide direct evidence of one's ability to succeed
  • A history of success in math tests and assignments will boost a student's confidence in their math abilities
  • Successes attributed to internal, stable, controllable causes (ability, effective strategies) have the greatest positive impact
• Vicarious experiences (observing similar others succeed), verbal persuasion (encouragement and feedback), and physiological states (stress reactions) also shape self-efficacy
• Teachers can foster self-efficacy by providing opportunities for mastery (appropriate challenges, incremental goals), modeling effective strategies, giving supportive feedback, and creating a positive emotional climate
  • Praising effort, persistence, and strategy use rather than innate ability promotes a growth mindset and resilient self-efficacy