3.3 Hostile work environment

Hostile work environments violate anti-discrimination laws and can lead to legal trouble for employers. To prove a claim, employees must show the harassment was severe or pervasive, unwelcome, based on a protected characteristic, and objectively offensive.

Employers can be liable for harassment by supervisors, coworkers, or even non-employees in some cases. To avoid liability, companies should implement clear policies, provide training, and respond promptly to complaints. Employees have rights to a safe workplace and protection from retaliation for reporting harassment.

Elements of hostile work environment

• A hostile work environment is a form of workplace harassment that violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and other anti-discrimination laws
• To prove a hostile work environment claim, an employee must demonstrate that the harassment was severe or pervasive, unwelcome, and based on a protected characteristic, and that a reasonable person would find the conduct offensive

Severe or pervasive conduct

Top images from around the web for Severe or pervasive conduct

• 

  Psychosocial Risk: How to prevent workplace bullying View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  10.2: Professionalism, Etiquette, and Ethical Behaviour – Communication at Work View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  10.2: Professionalism, Etiquette, and Ethical Behaviour – Professional Communications View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Psychosocial Risk: How to prevent workplace bullying View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  10.2: Professionalism, Etiquette, and Ethical Behaviour – Communication at Work View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Severe or pervasive conduct

• 

  Psychosocial Risk: How to prevent workplace bullying View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  10.2: Professionalism, Etiquette, and Ethical Behaviour – Communication at Work View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  10.2: Professionalism, Etiquette, and Ethical Behaviour – Professional Communications View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Psychosocial Risk: How to prevent workplace bullying View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  10.2: Professionalism, Etiquette, and Ethical Behaviour – Communication at Work View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• The harassing conduct must be either severe (single incident of extreme behavior) or pervasive (frequent or continuous pattern of less severe incidents) to create a hostile work environment
• Factors considered include frequency, severity, whether it interferes with work performance, and if it creates an intimidating or offensive environment
• Examples of severe conduct: sexual assault, racial slurs, threats of violence
• Examples of pervasive conduct: daily offensive jokes, repeated unwanted sexual advances, constant belittling comments

Unwelcome vs consensual behavior

• The harassing conduct must be unwelcome and unwanted by the victim
• Consensual behavior, such as mutual flirting or joking, does not constitute harassment
• If the victim initially participated in the conduct but later finds it unwelcome, they must clearly communicate that the behavior is no longer consensual
• Submission to harassing conduct does not necessarily mean it was welcome, especially if the victim feared retaliation

Protected characteristics targeted

• Hostile work environment harassment must be based on a protected characteristic under federal or state law, such as:
  • Race, color, national origin
  • Religion
  • Sex (including pregnancy, sexual orientation, gender identity)
  • Age (40 or older)
  • Disability
• Harassment based on other personal characteristics (appearance, personality) is not illegal unless it also relates to a protected class

Reasonable person standard

• The harassing conduct must be offensive both subjectively (to the victim) and objectively (to a reasonable person in the victim's position)
• Courts use a "reasonable person" standard to determine if the harassment was severe or pervasive enough to create a hostile work environment
• Factors considered include the victim's protected characteristic, employment position, and the overall context of the workplace
• The reasonable person standard helps prevent hypersensitive individuals from bringing frivolous claims

Types of harassing conduct

• Hostile work environment harassment can take many forms, including verbal, physical, and visual conduct that creates an intimidating, offensive, or abusive atmosphere
• The harassing conduct must be unwelcome and based on a protected characteristic to be unlawful

Verbal harassment

• Offensive jokes, slurs, or epithets related to a protected characteristic
• Derogatory comments or insults about an individual's protected status
• Unwelcome sexual advances, propositions, or demands for sexual favors
• Threats of violence or retaliation for rejecting advances or reporting harassment

Physical harassment

• Unwanted touching, groping, or sexual assault
• Physical intimidation, blocking movements, or threatening gestures
• Sabotaging work equipment or personal belongings
• Creating physical hazards or unsafe working conditions

Visual displays of hostility

• Offensive posters, cartoons, or drawings targeting a protected group
• Displaying pornographic or sexually suggestive images
• Sending explicit or derogatory emails, texts, or social media messages
• Wearing clothing with offensive slogans or symbols

Patterns of offensive behavior

• Consistently excluding or isolating individuals based on protected status
• Assigning undesirable tasks or denying opportunities due to protected characteristic
• Spreading rumors or gossip related to a person's protected status
• Encouraging others to participate in harassing behavior or condoning a hostile environment

Employer liability for harassment

• Employers can be held legally responsible for harassment committed by supervisors, coworkers, or even non-employees (customers, vendors) in certain circumstances
• The extent of employer liability depends on the harasser's relationship to the victim and the employer's actions to prevent and correct harassing behavior

Supervisor vs coworker harassment

• Employers are strictly liable for harassment by a supervisor that results in a tangible employment action (firing, demotion, pay cut, etc.)
• For supervisor harassment without a tangible action, employers can raise an affirmative defense by proving they reasonably tried to prevent and promptly correct the behavior, and the employee unreasonably failed to use complaint procedures
• Employers are liable for coworker harassment if they knew or should have known about the conduct and failed to take prompt and appropriate corrective action

Tangible employment actions

• A tangible employment action is a significant change in employment status, such as hiring, firing, promotion, demotion, reassignment, or a significant change in benefits
• If a supervisor's harassment results in a tangible action, the employer is automatically liable and cannot raise an affirmative defense
• Examples: firing an employee for rejecting sexual advances, demoting someone for complaining about harassment, denying a promotion based on a protected characteristic

Preventive measures and policies

• Employers should take reasonable steps to prevent harassment, such as:
  • Implementing and distributing clear anti-harassment policies
  • Providing regular harassment training to all employees
  • Establishing an effective complaint process and investigating all reports
  • Taking prompt corrective action when harassment occurs
• Employers who fail to take preventive measures may be liable for harassment even if they were unaware of specific incidents

Prompt and effective response

• When an employer learns of alleged harassment, they must act quickly to investigate and take appropriate corrective action
• A prompt and effective response may include:
  • Conducting a thorough and impartial investigation
  • Interviewing the complainant, accused, and witnesses
  • Reviewing relevant evidence and documents
  • Taking disciplinary action against the harasser, up to termination
  • Ensuring the harassment stops and the victim is not subject to retaliation
• Failure to respond promptly and effectively can lead to employer liability

Employee rights and protections

• Employees have the right to a work environment free from harassment and discrimination based on protected characteristics
• Federal and state laws provide various protections and remedies for employees who experience or report hostile work environment harassment

Right to a safe work environment

• Employers have a legal duty to provide a safe and healthful workplace under the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA)
• A hostile work environment can be considered an unsafe working condition if it creates a risk of physical or psychological harm
• Employees have the right to report unsafe conditions, including harassment, to their employer or OSHA without fear of retaliation

Protections against retaliation

• Anti-discrimination laws, such as Title VII, prohibit employers from retaliating against employees who oppose unlawful harassment, file a complaint, or participate in an investigation
• Retaliation can include any adverse action that would deter a reasonable person from engaging in protected activity, such as:
  • Termination, demotion, or pay cuts
  • Threats, intimidation, or increased harassment
  • Negative performance evaluations or references
  • Denial of promotions, benefits, or training opportunities
• Employees who experience retaliation can file a separate charge with the EEOC or state fair employment agency

Reporting procedures and timeframes

• Employees should follow their employer's internal complaint procedures for reporting harassment, if available
• If the employer does not have a complaint process or the employee fears retaliation, they can file a charge directly with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) or state fair employment agency
• Strict time limits apply for filing a charge:
  • 180 days from the last incident of harassment for EEOC charges
  • 300 days if a state or local agency enforces a similar law
  • Different deadlines may apply under state laws
• Employees should file a timely charge to preserve their legal rights and remedies

Confidentiality of complaints

• Employers should maintain confidentiality of harassment complaints to the extent possible, sharing information only on a need-to-know basis
• Investigators should explain confidentiality rules to complainants, accused, and witnesses, and protect sensitive information from unnecessary disclosure
• However, complete confidentiality cannot be guaranteed, as some information may need to be revealed to conduct a thorough investigation or comply with legal obligations
• Retaliation against an employee for breaking confidentiality of a complaint is prohibited

Investigating hostile work environment claims

• When an employer receives a complaint or otherwise learns of alleged harassment, they must conduct a prompt, thorough, and impartial investigation
• A proper investigation helps the employer determine whether harassment occurred, take appropriate corrective action, and avoid liability for failing to respond

Impartial and thorough investigation

• The investigator should be a neutral party with no stake in the outcome, such as a human resources representative or outside consultant
• A thorough investigation includes:
  • Interviewing the complainant, accused, and relevant witnesses
  • Reviewing personnel files, emails, security footage, or other evidence
  • Assessing credibility of parties and witnesses
  • Applying relevant policies and legal standards
  • Documenting all steps taken and information gathered
• Investigations should be completed promptly, usually within a few days to a few weeks depending on complexity

Interviewing complainant, accused, and witnesses

• The investigator should conduct private interviews with:
  • The complainant, to gather details of the alleged harassment and any witnesses or evidence
  • The accused, to obtain their response to the allegations and any supporting information
  • Relevant witnesses identified by either party or discovered during the investigation
• Interviews should be documented with written statements or notes, and include open-ended and follow-up questions to elicit all relevant information
• The investigator should explain confidentiality rules and anti-retaliation policies during each interview

Reviewing relevant evidence and documents

• In addition to interviews, the investigator should gather and review any relevant documentary or physical evidence, such as:
  • Emails, texts, or social media messages
  • Personnel files, performance reviews, or disciplinary records
  • Timesheets, schedules, or expense reports
  • Security camera footage or phone recordings
  • Complainant's contemporaneous notes or journal entries
• The investigator should also review the employer's anti-harassment policies and training materials to assess compliance and consistency

Reaching a fair determination

• After gathering all available evidence, the investigator must assess the credibility of the parties and witnesses to determine whether the alleged conduct more likely than not occurred
• Factors to consider in assessing credibility include:
  • Plausibility and consistency of statements
  • Corroborating evidence or witnesses
  • Motives to lie or past history of dishonesty
  • Demeanor during interviews
• If the investigator finds sufficient evidence of harassment, they should report conclusions to management for prompt corrective action
• In close cases, the investigator may reach an inconclusive determination, but should still recommend preventive measures to avoid future incidents

Remedies for hostile work environment

• If an employer determines that unlawful harassment occurred, they must take prompt and effective action to stop the conduct, prevent recurrence, and remedy any harm to the victim
• Remedies will vary depending on the severity and impact of the harassment, but may include disciplinary action against the harasser, restoration of job benefits, and monetary damages

Disciplinary actions against harasser

• Appropriate disciplinary action will depend on the nature and severity of the harassment, the harasser's position and history, and any aggravating or mitigating factors
• Potential disciplinary actions may include:
  • Verbal or written warning
  • Mandatory counseling or training
  • Suspension without pay
  • Demotion or transfer to a different position/location
  • Termination of employment
• The disciplinary action should be proportional to the offense and consistent with the employer's policies and past practices

Restoration of employee benefits

• If the harassment resulted in a tangible employment action, such as demotion or denial of promotion, the employer should restore the victim to their prior position or benefits
• Examples of restoration may include:
  • Reinstating a terminated employee with back pay
  • Granting a promotion that was unlawfully denied
  • Restoring job duties, schedule, or location
  • Removing negative performance evaluations or discipline
• The goal is to place the victim in the position they would have been in absent the harassment

Compensation for emotional distress

• Victims of hostile work environment harassment may be entitled to compensatory damages for emotional pain and suffering, even if they did not suffer a tangible employment action
• Factors that influence emotional distress damages include:
  • Severity and duration of the harassment
  • Psychological impact on the victim (depression, anxiety, PTSD)
  • Need for medical treatment or therapy
  • Effect on personal relationships and quality of life
• Emotional distress damages are subjective and vary widely, but are generally lower than damages for physical injury

Punitive damages in egregious cases

• In cases of particularly severe or malicious harassment, a court may award punitive damages to punish the employer and deter future misconduct
• Punitive damages are rare and require a showing that the employer acted with reckless disregard for the victim's rights or intentionally condoned the harassment
• Factors that support punitive damages include:
  • Harassment by a high-level manager or executive
  • Repeated failure to respond to prior complaints
  • Retaliation against the victim for reporting harassment
  • Destruction of evidence or obstruction of the investigation
• Punitive damages are subject to statutory caps based on the employer's size, ranging from $50,000 to$300,000

Preventing a hostile work environment

• The best way for employers to avoid liability for hostile work environment harassment is to take proactive steps to prevent it from occurring in the first place
• Effective prevention strategies include clear policies, regular training, modeling respectful behavior, and prompt action on complaints

Clear anti-harassment policies

• Employers should develop and distribute a clear, written policy prohibiting harassment based on any protected characteristic
• The policy should include:
  • Definition and examples of prohibited conduct
  • Complaint procedures and contact information for reporting harassment
  • Investigation process and confidentiality rules
  • Disciplinary consequences for substantiated harassment
  • Prohibition on retaliation for reporting or participating in investigations
• The policy should be included in employee handbooks, posted in common areas, and redistributed annually or as needed

Regular employee training programs

• Employers should provide regular harassment prevention training to all employees, including supervisors and managers
• Effective training programs should include:
  • Explanation of the employer's anti-harassment policy and complaint procedures
  • Definition and examples of prohibited conduct, including subtle or less obvious forms of harassment
  • Emphasis on everyone's responsibility to report and prevent harassment
  • Strategies for bystander intervention and supporting victims
  • Consequences for engaging in or condoning harassment
• Training should be interactive, tailored to the specific workplace, and repeated at regular intervals (e.g., annually)

Modeling respectful workplace behavior

• Managers and supervisors should model respectful and inclusive behavior to set the tone for the rest of the workforce
• Leaders should:
  • Use respectful language and avoid offensive jokes or comments
  • Include and value diverse perspectives in decision-making
  • Intervene promptly if they witness inappropriate conduct
  • Take all harassment complaints seriously and investigate thoroughly
  • Hold harassers accountable regardless of position or performance
• A respectful culture starts at the top and filters down to all levels of the organization

Swift action on complaints

• Employers should have a clear and well-publicized complaint process for reporting harassment, including multiple avenues for making complaints (e.g., HR, hotline, online form)
• All complaints should be promptly and thoroughly investigated by a neutral party, with appropriate corrective action taken if substantiated
• Investigators should:
  • Interview the complainant, accused, and relevant witnesses
  • Review any documentary or physical evidence
  • Assess credibility and make a determination based on the preponderance of the evidence
  • Recommend proportionate disciplinary action and other remedial measures
• Employers should follow up with the complainant to ensure the harassment has stopped and there is no retaliation